Urban evolution in the USA

On a sustained basis, cities are of non-uniform relative sizes. This paper addresses three basic issues which arise from this simple observation by examining the size distribution of US cities over the period 1900--1990. First, we explore the reasons why there is a wide distribution of city sizes. Second, we characterize the evolution of the size distribution of cities, documenting growth in sizes and numbers of cities. We ask whether the relative size distribution of cities has remained stable over time, or if it has displayed, instead, a tendency to collapse, flatten, or otherwise change its shape. We also examine evidence on whether the size distribution obeys Zipf's Law. Third, we examine the degree and determinants of mobility of individual cities within this distribution, asking to what extent cities are moving up and down in the distribution and how this movement is influenced by cities' geographic characteristics. We use a newly constructed data with consistent metropolitan area definitions over this century, discussing the issues and linking our results to the relevant literature. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

[1]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[2]  X. Gabaix.  Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[3]  W. Fuller,et al.  LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTICS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT , 1981 .

[4]  W. Arthur.  ‘Silicon Valley’ locational clusters: when do increasing returns imply monopoly? , 1990 .

[5]  P. Krugman.  The Self Organizing Economy , 1996 .

[6]  Masahisa Fujita,et al.  Global Location Behavior and Organizational Dynamics of Japanese Electronics Firms and Their Impact on Regional Economies , 1999 .

[7]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  A First Course on Stochastic Processes , 1968 .

[8]  David E. Weinstein,et al.  Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation , 1997 .

[9]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  Zipf’s law for cities : an empirical examination , 2000 .

[10]  Duncan Black,et al.  A Theory of Urban Growth , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[12]  J. S. Clark,et al.  Gibrat's Law and the Growth of Canadian Cities , 1991 .

[13]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[14]  Henry G. Overman,et al.  Cross-sectional evolution of the U.S. city size distribution , 2001 .

[15]  Jed Kolko.  Can I Get Some Service Here? Information Technology, Service Industries, and the Future of Cities , 1999 .

[16]  Kenneth T. Rosen,et al.  The Size Distribution of Cities: An Examination of the Pareto Law and Primacy , 1980 .

[17]  Zvi Eckstein,et al.  Cities and Growth: Theory and Evidence from France and Japan , 1994 .

[18]  Tomoya Mori,et al.  On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems1 , 1999 .

[19]  Peter M. Greenston,et al.  The Agglomeration Process in Urban Growth , 1972 .

[20]  X. Gabaix.  Zipf's Law and the Growth of Cities , 1999 .

[21]  J. Henderson.  Urban Development: Theory, Fact, and Illusion , 1988 .

[22]  Scott D. Schuh,et al.  Job Creation and Destruction , 1997 .

[23]  J. Henderson.  The Sizes and Types of Cities , 1972 .

[24]  G. Duranton,et al.  Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation and the Life-Cycle of Products , 2001 .

[25]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .