A Model of the Global and Institutional Antecedents of High-Level Corporate Environmental Performance

Stories of firms that exceed local compliance requirements in their environmental performance appear routinely. However, we have limited theoretical explanations of what propels these firms to exceed compliance. Our theory suggests that global competitive and institutional pressures lead multinational firms to develop highlevel, environmental management systems (EMS) that make them more competitive. For economic and other reasons, select firms make the choice to rationalize their collective environmental performance to the highest common denominator rather than the lowest. Regulations around the world differ widely and are a moving target in many settings. The need to comply with such myriad, shifting rules leads to firms creating EMS to help stay ahead of regulations worldwide. Using institutional and internationalization theories as our basis, we offer a propositional model concerning global competitive/institutional pressures and their effects on corporate environmental performance. We conclude the paper with a discussion of the implications of the model.

[1]  M. Khanna,et al.  Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives , 2002, Land Economics.

[2]  Teresa M. Shaft,et al.  Using Interorganizational Information Systems to Support Environmental Management Efforts at ASG , 2001 .

[3]  R. Florida,et al.  Gaining from Green Management: Environmental Management Systems inside and outside the Factory , 2001 .

[4]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Linking Organizational and Field Level Analyses: The Diffusion of Corporate Environmental Practice , 2001 .

[5]  G. J. Lewis,et al.  Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: The Extension of Miller’s Scale to the Natural Environment , 2001 .

[6]  B. Allenby The Fallacy of “Green Technology” , 2000 .

[7]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[8]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value , 2000 .

[9]  Sanjay Sharma Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[10]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation , 2000 .

[11]  Fabio Iraldo,et al.  Environmental Management Systems and SMEs , 2000 .

[12]  Y. Doz,et al.  The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision , 1999 .

[13]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[14]  A. Hoffman Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry , 1999 .

[15]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  Are Conglomerates Less Environmentally Responsible? An Empirical Examination of Diversification Strategy and Subsidiary Pollution in the U.S. Chemical Industry , 1999 .

[16]  Yadong Luo Entry and Cooperative Strategies in International Business Expansion , 1999 .

[17]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[18]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Conoco and the Vapor Recovery Project: Using Innovation to Preserve Autonomy , 1999 .

[19]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Corporate Strategy and International Environmental Policy , 1998 .

[20]  D. Wheeler,et al.  In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960 to 1995 , 1998 .

[21]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Capital Market Responses to Environmental Performance in Developing Countries , 1998 .

[22]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework , 1998 .

[23]  Peter A. Soyka,et al.  Does Improving a Firm's Environmental Management System and Environmental Performance Result in a Higher Stock Price? , 1997 .

[24]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[25]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  The next step in becoming “green”: Life-cycle oriented environmental management☆ , 1997 .

[26]  Teresa M. Shaft,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems in Life‐Cycle‐Oriented Environmental Management , 1997 .

[27]  G. Eskeland,et al.  Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis , 1997 .

[28]  Ulrich Steger,et al.  MANAGERIAL ISSUES IN CLOSING THE LOOP , 1996 .

[29]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[30]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  International Environmental Standards and Corporate Policies: An Integrative Framework , 1996 .

[31]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Does Isomorphism Legitimate? , 1996 .

[32]  Patrick Low,et al.  International trade and the environment , 1996 .

[33]  C. Hill International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace , 1996 .

[34]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[35]  G. M. Gallarotti,et al.  It pays to be green: The managerial incentive structure and environmentally sound strategies , 1995 .

[36]  M. Starik,et al.  Weaving An Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations , 1995 .

[37]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[38]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[39]  Thomas J. Dean,et al.  Pollution Regulation as a Barrier to New Firm Entry: Initial Evidence and Implications for Future Research , 1995 .

[40]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[41]  David Wheeler,et al.  Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens? , 1993 .

[42]  R. Lucas Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution : 1960-88 , 1992 .

[43]  R. Grant Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[44]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Antecedents of Organizational Slack , 1988 .

[45]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality , 1984 .

[46]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[47]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[48]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[49]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[50]  PotashCorp 2002 Sustainability Report , 2002 .

[51]  F. Kodama,et al.  Reconciling the conflict between the 'pollution-haven' hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer , 2000 .

[52]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[53]  Linda S. Munilla,et al.  The impact of ISO 14000 environmental management standards on small and medium sized enterprises , 1999 .

[54]  Clinton J. Andrews,et al.  Environmental business strategy: Corporate leaders’ perceptions , 1998 .

[55]  Chad Nehrt,et al.  Maintainability of First Mover Advantages When Environmental Regulations Differ Between Countries , 1998 .

[56]  M. Ferrantino International Trade, Environmental Quality and Public Policy , 1997 .

[57]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1997 .

[58]  J. Hamilton Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data , 1995 .

[59]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Horses for Courses: Organizational Forms for Multinational Corporations , 1993 .

[60]  Vincent di Norcia Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[61]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[62]  H. Jeffrey Leonard,et al.  Pollution and the struggle for world product , 1988 .

[63]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collegctive rationality in organizational fie , 1983 .

[64]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[65]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .