Comparison of segmentation techniques to determine the geometric parameters of structured surfaces

Structured surfaces, defined as surfaces characterized by topography features whose shape is defined by design specifications, are increasingly being used in industry for a variety of applications, including improving the tribological properties of surfaces. However, characterization of such surfaces still remains an issue. Techniques have been recently proposed, based on identifying and extracting the relevant features from a structured surface so they can be verified individually, using methods derived from those commonly applied to standard-sized parts. Such emerging approaches show promise but are generally complex and characterized by multiple data processing steps making performance difficult to assess. This paper focuses on the segmentation step, i.e. partitioning the topography so that the relevant features can be separated from the background. Segmentation is key for defining the geometric boundaries of the individual feature, which in turn affects any computation of feature size, shape and localization. This paper investigates the effect of varying the segmentation algorithm and its controlling parameters by considering a test case: a structured surface for bearing applications, the relevant features being micro-dimples designed for friction reduction. In particular, the mechanisms through which segmentation leads to identification of the dimple boundary and influences dimensional properties, such as dimple diameter and depth, are illustrated. It is shown that, by using different methods and control parameters, a significant range of measurement results can be achieved, which may not necessarily agree. Indications on how to investigate the influence of each specific choice are given; in particular, stability of the algorithms with respect to control parameters is analyzed as a means to investigate ease of calibration and flexibility to adapt to specific, application-dependent characterization requirements.

[2]  Chi Fai Cheung,et al.  Characterization of surface generation of optical microstructures using a pattern and feature parametric analysis method , 2010 .

[3]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Andreas A. Polycarpou,et al.  Friction characteristics of microtextured surfaces under mixed and hydrodynamic lubrication , 2013 .

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  A review on image segmentation techniques , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Izhak Etsion,et al.  Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Laser-Textured Mechanical Seal Faces , 1999 .

[8]  Agostino G. Bruzzone,et al.  Advances in engineered surfaces for functional performance , 2008 .

[9]  Gavin D. MacAulay,et al.  On the characterisation of periodic patterns in tessellated surfaces , 2014 .

[10]  J. MacQueen.  Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[11]  Christopher J. Evans,et al.  “Structured”, “Textured” or “Engineered” Surfaces , 1999 .

[12]  I. Lyashenko,et al.  Statistical theory of the boundary friction of atomically flat solid surfaces in the presence of a lubricant layer , 2012 .

[13]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Measurement and Characterisation of Micro/nano-scale Structured Surfaces , 2012 .

[14]  Izhak Etsion,et al.  Modeling of surface texturing in hydrodynamic lubrication , 2013, Friction.

[15]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[16]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Morphologic segmentation algorithms for extracting individual surface features from areal surface topography maps , 2013 .

[17]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Technological shifts in surface metrology , 2012 .

[18]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  TOPICAL REVIEW: Bandwidth characteristics and comparisons of surface texture measuring instruments , 2010 .

[19]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Flexible shape extraction for micro/nano scale structured surfaces. , 2009 .

[20]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Characterisation of Individual Areal Features , 2013 .

[22]  Yoshiteru Yasuda,et al.  Effect of surface texturing on friction reduction between ceramic and steel materials under lubricated sliding contact , 2003 .

[23]  P.K Sahoo,et al.  A survey of thresholding techniques , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[24]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Kamlakar P Rajurkar,et al.  Bio-inspired functional surfaces for advanced applications , 2013 .