Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330 nm deep microgrooves

The surface microtexture of an orthopaedic device can regulate cellular adhesion, a process fundamental in the initiation of osteoinduction and osteogenesis. Advances in fabrication techniques have evolved to include the field of surface modification; in particular, nanotechnology has allowed for the development of experimental nanoscale substrates for investigation into cell nanofeature interactions. Here primary human osteoblasts (HOBs) were cultured on ordered nanoscale groove/ridge arrays fabricated by photolithography. Grooves were 330 nm deep and either 10, 25 or 100 μm in width. Adhesion subtypes in HOBs were quantified by immunofluorescent microscopy and cell–substrate interactions were investigated via immunocytochemistry with scanning electron microscopy. To further investigate the effects of these substrates on cellular function, 1.7 K gene microarray analysis was used to establish gene regulation profiles of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on these nanotopographies. Nanotopographies significantly affected the formation of focal complexes (FXs), focal adhesions (FAs) and supermature adhesions (SMAs). Planar control substrates induced widespread adhesion formation; 100 μm wide groove/ridge arrays did not significantly affect adhesion formation yet induced upregulation of genes involved in skeletal development and increased osteospecific function; 25 μm wide groove/ridge arrays were associated with a reduction in SMA and an increase in FX formation; and 10 μm wide groove/ridge arrays significantly reduced osteoblast adhesion and induced an interplay of up- and downregulation of gene expression. This study indicates that groove/ridge topographies are important modulators of both cellular adhesion and osteospecific function and, critically, that groove/ridge width is important in determining cellular response.

[1]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Dynamics and segregation of cell–matrix adhesions in cultured fibroblasts , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[3]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Morphological and microarray analysis of human fibroblasts cultured on nanocolumns produced by colloidal lithography. , 2005, European cells & materials.

[4]  Josephine C. Adams,et al.  Molecular organisation of cell–matrix contacts: essential multiprotein assemblies in cell and tissue function , 2002, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[5]  D. Brunette,et al.  Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[6]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[7]  R. P. Jean,et al.  Characterization of the nuclear deformation caused by changes in endothelial cell shape. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  Joshua C. Hansen,et al.  The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[9]  D. Hamilton,et al.  The effect of substratum topography on osteoblast adhesion mediated signal transduction and phosphorylation. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[10]  Jun Hu,et al.  Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[11]  S. Weiner,et al.  On the relationship between the microstructure of bone and its mechanical stiffness. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[13]  D. Seabold,et al.  Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  J. Jansen,et al.  The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[15]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Lifeng Chi,et al.  Osteoblast alignment, elongation and migration on grooved polystyrene surfaces patterned by Langmuir-Blodgett lithography. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[17]  A. Besser,et al.  Force-induced adsorption and anisotropic growth of focal adhesions. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[18]  B. Geiger,et al.  Early molecular events in the assembly of the focal adhesion-stress fiber complex during fibroblast spreading. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[19]  L. Addadi,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Sequence of Events in Cell Adhesion: From Molecular Recognition to Focal Adhesion Assembly , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[20]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[21]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  R G Richards,et al.  Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S‐phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  R. G. Richards,et al.  A Quantitative Method of Measuring Cell-Substrate Adhesion Areas , 1997 .

[24]  P S Walker,et al.  Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[25]  A. Bershadsky,et al.  Focal contacts of normal and RSV-transformed quail cells. Hypothesis of the transformation-induced deficient maturation of focal contacts. , 1985, Experimental cell research.

[26]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Micro- and nano-patterned substrates to manipulate cell adhesion. , 2007, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[27]  K. Leong,et al.  Effects of nanoimprinted patterns in tissue-culture polystyrene on cell behavior. , 2005, Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society.

[28]  C. Turner,et al.  Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[29]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Organization and function of stress fibers in cells in vitro and in situ. A review. , 1984, Cell and muscle motility.

[30]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Variation in cell-substratum adhesion in relation to cell cycle phases. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[31]  I. Gwynn,et al.  Backscattered electron imaging of the undersurface of resin‐embedded cells by field‐emission scanning electron microscopy , 1995, Journal of microscopy.

[32]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  A. Curtis,et al.  Nonadhesive nanotopography: fibroblast response to poly(n-butyl methacrylate)-poly(styrene) demixed surface features. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[34]  N. Kiyosawa,et al.  Morphological and microarray analysis of T-2 toxin-induced rat fetal brain lesion. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[35]  C J Murphy,et al.  Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[36]  C. D. W. Wilkinson,et al.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[37]  Iwona Jasiuk,et al.  SEM and TEM study of the hierarchical structure of C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ mice trabecular bone. , 2004, Bone.

[38]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[40]  A F von Recum,et al.  Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS , 1964, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  Kazuo Katoh,et al.  Rho‐kinase dependent organization of stress fibers and focal adhesions in cultured fibroblasts , 2007, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[43]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[44]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[46]  Doron Steinberg,et al.  Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[47]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Biomimetic Polymer Nanostructures by Injection Molding , 2003 .

[48]  J. Jansen,et al.  Effect of microgrooved poly-l-lactic (PLA) surfaces on proliferation, cytoskeletal organization, and mineralized matrix formation of rat bone marrow cells. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[49]  A. Persikov,et al.  Molecular structure of the collagen triple helix. , 2005, Advances in protein chemistry.

[50]  A F von Recum,et al.  Microtopography and soft tissue response. , 1989, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[51]  Daniel Howard,et al.  Immunoselection and adenoviral genetic modulation of human osteoprogenitors: in vivo bone formation on PLA scaffold. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[52]  A. Curtis,et al.  IMMUNOGOLD LABELLING OF FIBROBLAST FOCAL ADHESION SITES VISUALISED IN FIXED MATERIAL USING SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, AND LIVING, USING INTERNAL REFLECTION MICROSCOPY , 2001, Cell biology international.

[53]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[54]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[55]  David I. Wilson,et al.  Characterization and Multipotentiality of Human Fetal Femur–Derived Cells: Implications for Skeletal Tissue Regeneration , 2006, Stem cells.

[56]  M. Giraud‐Guille Twisted plywood architecture of collagen fibrils in human compact bone osteons , 1988, Calcified Tissue International.

[57]  S. Britland,et al.  Contact guidance in human dermal fibroblasts is modulated by population pressure , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[58]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.