Coordinated Pricing Analysis with the Carbon Tax Scheme in a Supply Chain

The carbon tax is a cost-efficient scheme to curb emissions, and it has been implemented in Australia, British Columbia, and other places worldwide. We aim to analyze its effect on dynamic pricing in a supply chain with multiple suppliers and one manufacturer. The profit-maximizing manufacturer makes final products using raw materials from suppliers with heterogeneous prices and emission rates. A two-stage game model is built over an infinite time horizon for this issue. In the first stage, suppliers face price-dependent demand to set their prices and production rates under the constraint of inventory capacity. Then, in response to the carbon tax scheme, the manufacturer evaluates the procurement prices and emission rates of suppliers to control its emission volumes and sets the sales price of its product. This paper predominately focuses on the optimal pricing strategies in a decentralized supply chain. The open-loop equilibrium and Markovian Nash equilibrium for the dynamic pricing game models of both suppliers and the manufacturer are derived, respectively. The equilibrium prices of suppliers and the manufacturer can be solved based on both irreversible actions and real-time states. These two types of equilibria can be regarded as the solutions of two different models in specific situations. To analyze the effect of sourcing diversity on pricing strategies and emissions control for the manufacturer, the more general equilibrium price for the manufacturer in an n-suppliers oligopoly is studied. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the equilibrium and its monotonicity with various parameter settings.

[1]  Imre Dobos,et al.  The effects of emission trading on production and inventories in the Arrow–Karlin model , 2005 .

[2]  William Ho,et al.  Optimal procurement decision with a carbon tax for the manufacturing industry , 2018, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Georgia Perakis,et al.  Competitive Multi-period Pricing for Perishable Products: A Robust Optimization Approach , 2006, Math. Program..

[4]  Michael R. Galbreth,et al.  Optimal Acquisition and Sorting Policies for Remanufacturing , 2006 .

[5]  Ming Hu,et al.  Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Assets under Competition , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Yifan Xu,et al.  Competitive and Collaborative Quality and Warranty Management in Supply Chains , 2012 .

[7]  Deishin Lee,et al.  The Effect of Sourcing Policies on a Supplier's Sustainable Practices , 2017 .

[8]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[9]  Kyle Y. Lin,et al.  Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Shoude Li,et al.  A Differential Game of Transboundary Industrial Pollution with Emission Permits Trading , 2014, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[11]  Mahmut Parlar,et al.  Optimal control of a revenue management system with dynamic pricing facing linear demand , 2006 .

[12]  Brian C. Murray,et al.  British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest "grand experiment" in environmental policy , 2015 .

[13]  J. Laffont,et al.  Pollution Permits and Compliance Strategies , 1996 .

[14]  Kalyan T. Talluri,et al.  Dynamic Price Competition with Fixed Capacities , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[15]  T. Cheng,et al.  Managing carbon footprints in inventory management , 2011 .

[16]  Ravi Subramanian,et al.  Compliance Strategies Under Permits for Emissions , 2007 .

[17]  Cheryl Gaimon,et al.  The Management of Technology: A Production and Operations Management Perspective , 2008 .

[18]  Wei-yu Kevin Chiang,et al.  Supply Chain Dynamics and Channel Efficiency in Durable Product Pricing and Distribution , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[19]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Misplaced Inventory and Radio‐Frequency Identification (RFID) Technology: Information and Coordination , 2010 .

[20]  Gary M. Erickson,et al.  A differential game model of the marketing-operations interface , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Dmitry Krass,et al.  Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology , 2013 .

[22]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Optimal apparel supplier selection with forecast updates under carbon emission taxation scheme , 2013, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Ngo Van Long,et al.  Differential Games in Economics and Management Science: List of tables , 2000 .

[24]  Dan Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Pricing Competition with Strategic Customers Under Vertical Product Differentiation , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Carmen Camacho,et al.  Carbon capture and storage and transboundary pollution: A differential game approach , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Eskinder Demisse Gemechu,et al.  Environmental tax on products and services based on their carbon footprint: A case study of the pulp and paper sector , 2012 .

[27]  S. Jørgensen Optimal production, purchasing and pricing: A differential game approach , 1986 .

[28]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation , 2015 .

[29]  M. Jaber,et al.  Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives , 2013 .

[30]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  Pricing, Allocation, and Overbooking in Dynamic Service Network Competition When Demand Is Uncertain , 2008 .

[31]  Xi Chen,et al.  The carbon-constrained EOQ , 2013, Oper. Res. Lett..

[32]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  The Customer Contact Approach to Services: Theoretical Bases and Practical Extensions , 1981, Oper. Res..

[34]  Sean X. Zhou,et al.  Optimal Production Planning with Emissions Trading , 2013, Oper. Res..