Assessment of seismic behaviour of SMRFs with RBS connections by means of mixed‐based state‐space approach

SUMMARY With an intention to implement a reliable numerical implementation of the mixed-based state-space strategy for steel structural systems, the paper presents a thorough seismic analysis of steel moment resisting frames (SMRFs) with reduced beam section (RBS) connections. Firstly, a model of beam-column element inclusive of material and geometric nonlinearities is effi ciently utilized derived from appropriate force interpolation functions. Moreover, with the present formulation, non-prismatic properties of RBS region can be considered without the necessity of heavy discretization of elements. Contribution of panel zone is taken into account by considering a nonlinear rotational spring as well. In addition, the extension of Wen-Bouc model to capture material inelasticity is applied that is apparently superior to other constitutive behaviour when it leads to both a smooth hysteretic model and rather precisely well-mannered state-space depiction capable of conveying several hysteretic features. The state-space approach is then employed where nodal forces balance and constitutive equations are solved simultaneously. Secondly, three-dimensional fi nite element analysis is surveyed to validate proposed macroelement model. Finally, a set of nonlinear static and transient analyses of four- and eight-storey frames with and without RBS connections are fulfi lled. Then, structural demand parameters used to assess the global and local response of designated frames. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Kitjasateanphun,et al.  Seismic performance of steel moment frames with reduced beam sections , 2000 .

[2]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Cyclic Testing of Steel Moment Connections Rehabilitated with RBS or Welded Haunch , 2000 .

[3]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Nonlinear Structural Analysis Towards Collapse Simulation: A Dynamical Systems Approach , 2004 .

[4]  Filip C. Filippou,et al.  Evaluation of Nonlinear Frame Finite-Element Models , 1997 .

[5]  Janice J. Chambers,et al.  Effect of Reduced Beam Section Frame Elements on Stiffness of Moment Frames , 2003 .

[6]  F. Filippou,et al.  Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element , 1996 .

[7]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hysteretic Models for Cyclic Behavior of Deteriorating Inelastic Structures , 1999 .

[8]  Marco Petrangeli,et al.  A FIBRE FINITE BEAM ELEMENT WITH SECTION SHEAR MODELLING FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURES , 1998 .

[9]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Cyclically Loaded Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections , 2002 .

[10]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Seismic performance of steel frames with reduced beam section connections , 2005 .

[11]  Jin-Ho Kim,et al.  Effects of Panel Zone Strength and Beam Web Connection Method on Seismic Performance of Reduced Beam Section Steel Moment Connections , 2005 .

[12]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames , 2002 .

[13]  Sheng-Jin Chen,et al.  Ductile Steel Beam-to-Column Connections for Seismic Resistance , 1996 .

[14]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1998 .

[15]  Hong Hao,et al.  Inelastic analysis of steel frames with reduced beam sections , 2001 .

[16]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Collapse Analysis: Large Inelastic Deformations Analysis of Planar Frames , 2002 .

[17]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations , 1996, Classics in applied mathematics.

[18]  Steen Krenk,et al.  State‐space time integration with energy control and fourth‐order accuracy for linear dynamic systems , 2006 .

[19]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  A BEAM ELEMENT FOR SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[20]  Sam Kassegne,et al.  Development of a closed-form 3-D RBS beam finite element and associated case studies , 2007 .

[21]  H Krawinkler,et al.  Shear in Beam-Column Joints in Seismic Design of Steel Frames , 1978, Engineering Journal.

[22]  Mohsen A. Issa,et al.  Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames , 2002 .

[23]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Structural Frame Systems by the State‐Space Approach , 2000 .

[24]  B. Riley,et al.  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , 2009 .

[25]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Cyclic Response and Design Recommendations of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections with Deep Columns , 2002 .

[26]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  SEISMIC REHABILITATION DESIGN OF STEEL MOMENT CONNECTION WITH WELDED HAUNCH , 2000 .

[27]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Evaluation of FEMA-350 Seismic Provisions for Steel Panel Zones , 2005 .