Nutrient enrichment and food chains: can evolution buffer top-down control?

We show how evolutionary dynamics can alter the predictions of classical models of the effects of nutrient enrichment on food webs. We compare an ecological nutrient-plant-herbivore food-chain model without evolution with the same model, including herbivore evolution, plant evolution, or both. When only herbivores are allowed to evolve, the predictions are similar to those of the ecological model without evolution, i.e., plant biomass does not change with nutrient addition. When only plants evolve, nutrient enrichment leads to an increase in the biomass of all compartments. In contrast, when plants and herbivores are allowed to coevolve, although these two classical patterns are common, a wide variety of other responses is possible. The form of the trade-offs that constrain evolution of the two protagonists is then critical. This stresses the need for experimental data on phenotypic traits, their costs and their influence on the interactions between organisms and the rest of the community.

[1]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 1997, Science.

[2]  P. Abrams The Evolution of Predator-Prey Interactions: Theory and Evidence , 2000 .

[3]  G. Polis,et al.  Food webs, trophic cascades and community structure , 2006 .

[4]  E. Houde,et al.  Factors in the Decline of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[5]  R. Huey,et al.  Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. , 2000, Science.

[6]  G. Polis,et al.  Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics , 1997 .

[7]  S. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Enrichment on Three‐Level Food Chains with Omnivory , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[9]  M. A. Leibold,et al.  Resource Edibility and the Effects of Predators and Productivity on the Outcome of Trophic Interactions , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[10]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Tuomi Toward integration of plant defence theories. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  P. Abrams Dynamics and Interactions in Food Webs with Adaptive Foragers , 1996 .

[13]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Predators that Benefit Prey and Prey that Harm Predators: Unusual Effects of Interacting Foraging Adaptation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[14]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic Cascades in Terrestrial Systems: A Review of the Effects of Carnivore Removals on Plants , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[15]  J. Thompson,et al.  Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection , 2002, Nature.

[16]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[17]  T. Z. Dawes-Gromadzki Trophic trickles rather than cascades: Conditional top‐down and bottom‐up dynamics in an Australian chenopod shrubland , 2002 .

[18]  P. Abrams Implications of Dynamically Variable Traits for Identifying, Classifying, and Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[19]  D. Herms,et al.  The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[20]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  THE ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS OF ALTRUISM IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS POPULATIONS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[22]  M. Power,et al.  TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES IN FOOD WEBS: DO PLANTS HAVE PRIMACY? , 1992 .

[23]  Abrams Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter‐ and intraspecific interactions: An assessment of three methods , 2001 .

[24]  M. Baalen,et al.  Antagonistic Coevolution over Productivity Gradients , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Charles W Fox,et al.  Rapid Evolution of Egg Size in Captive Salmon , 2003, Science.

[26]  T. Quinn,et al.  Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. , 2000, Science.

[27]  P. Abrams,et al.  Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits , 1993, Evolutionary Ecology.

[28]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient , 2003 .

[29]  J. Thompson EVALUATING THE DYNAMICS OF COEVOLUTION AMONG GEOGRAPHICALLY STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1997 .

[30]  M. Rausher Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemies. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[31]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Regulation of Lake Primary Productivity by Food Web Structure. , 1987, Ecology.

[32]  Jonathan M. Chase CENTRAL-PLACE FORAGER EFFECTS ON FOOD WEB DYNAMICS AND SPATIAL PATTERN IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MEADOWS , 1998 .

[33]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  A Graphical Model of Keystone Predators in Food Webs: Trophic Regulation of Abundance, Incidence, and Diversity Patterns in Communities , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[34]  J. Thompson,et al.  Specific Hypotheses on the Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[35]  B. Grant,et al.  PREDICTING MICROEVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE VARIATION , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  S. Fretwell Food chain dynamics: the central theory of ecology? , 1987 .

[37]  L. Oksanen Trophic Exploitation and Arctic Phytomass Patterns , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[38]  M. Järvinen Control of plankton and nutrient limitation in small boreal brown-water lakes: evidence from small- and large-scale manipulation experiments , 2002 .

[39]  L. Dyer,et al.  Top‐down and bottom‐up diversity cascades in detrital vs. living food webs , 2002 .

[40]  M. Coe,et al.  Biomass and production of large African herbivores in relation to rainfall and primary production , 1976, Oecologia.

[41]  N. Loeuille,et al.  Consequences of plant-herbivore coevolution on the dynamics and functioning of ecosystems. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  Michael T. Brett,et al.  Consumer Versus Resource Control in Freshwater Pelagic Food Webs , 1997, Science.

[43]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment , 2000, Nature.

[44]  L. Tranvik,et al.  Effects of Enrichment on Simple Aquatic Food Webs , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Rebecca E. Forkner,et al.  WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN? NUTRIENT ADDITION AND PREDATION PRESSURE ON OAK HERBIVORES , 2000 .

[46]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Effect of Increased Productivity on the Abundances of Trophic Levels , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[47]  S. Fretwell,et al.  The Regulation of Plant Communities by the Food Chains Exploiting Them , 2015 .

[48]  John R. Post,et al.  BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN IMPACTS ON FRESHWATER PELAGIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURE' , 1989 .

[49]  Chase Are there real differences among aquatic and terrestrial food webs? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  Robert A. Armstrong,et al.  Prey Species Replacement along a Gradient of Nutrient Enrichment: A Graphical Approach , 1979 .

[51]  P. Abrams,et al.  PREY ADAPTATION AS A CAUSE OF PREDATOR‐PREY CYCLES , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  M. Hunter Multiple approaches to estimating the relative importanceof top-down and bottom-up forces on insect populations:Experiments, life tables, and time-series analysis , 2001 .

[53]  Robert J. Taylor The evolution of predator-prey systems , 1984 .

[54]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: an ecological perspective , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[55]  Denis Réale,et al.  Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Hot Spots, Cold Spots, and the Geographic Mosaic Theory of Coevolution , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[57]  P. Stiling,et al.  Top‐down, bottom‐up, or side to side? Within‐trophic‐level interactions modify trophic dynamics of a salt marsh herbivore , 2002 .

[58]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[59]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  L. Hansson Food as a limiting factor for small rodent numbers , 2004, Oecologia.

[61]  J. N. Thompson,et al.  Rapid evolution as an ecological process. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  Sears,et al.  When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  J. Estes,et al.  Sea Otters: Their Role in Structuring Nearshore Communities , 1974, Science.

[64]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PRODUCTIVITY, HERBIVORY, AND PLANT SPECIES TURNOVER IN GRASSLAND FOOD WEBS , 2000 .

[65]  C. F. Wilkinson,et al.  Detoxication Enzymes in the Guts of Caterpillars: An Evolutionary Answer to Plant Defenses? , 1971, Science.

[66]  M. Hunter,et al.  Playing Chutes and Ladders: Heterogeneity and the Relative Roles of Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Forces in Natural Communities , 1992, Ecology.

[67]  J. Burkholder,et al.  Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences , 2002 .

[68]  M. Rausher,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Plant Resistance to Herbivory , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[69]  P. Abrams,et al.  Adaptation, density dependence and the responses of trophic level abundances to mortality , 2003 .

[70]  R. Mauricio Costs of Resistance to Natural Enemies in Field Populations of the Annual Plant Arabidopsis thaliana , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[71]  G. B. Arous,et al.  The canonical equation of adaptive dynamics: a mathematical view , 2002 .

[72]  H. Setälä,et al.  NO EVIDENCE OF TROPHIC CASCADES IN AN EXPERIMENTAL MICROBIAL‐BASED SOIL FOOD WEB , 1998 .

[73]  J. Burdon,et al.  Evolution of Virulence in a Plant Host-Pathogen Metapopulation , 2003, Science.

[74]  V. Brown,et al.  Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems , 1997 .

[75]  M. Power RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT BY INDIRECT EFFECTS OF GRAZERS: ARMORED CATFISH, ALGAE, AND SEDIMENT' , 1990 .

[76]  U. Dieckmann The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution , 1996 .

[77]  J. Murphy,et al.  Herbivory: Caterpillar saliva beats plant defences , 2002, Nature.

[78]  I. Eshel Evolutionary and continuous stability , 1983 .

[79]  H. Hillebrand Opposing effects of grazing and nutrients on diversity , 2003 .

[80]  R. James,et al.  Tradeoffs and the evolution of thermal reaction norms , 2003 .

[81]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Species Turnover and the Regulation of Trophic Structure , 1997 .

[82]  J. Kaiser The Other Global Pollutant: Nitrogen Proves Tough to Curb , 2001, Science.

[83]  M. Neubert,et al.  Body size and food web structure: testing the equiprobability assumption of the cascade model , 2000, Oecologia.

[84]  P. Abrams,et al.  ADAPTIVE RESPONSES OF PREDATORS TO PREY AND PREY TO PREDATORS: THE FAILURE OF THE ARMS‐RACE ANALOGY , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.