Central resource involvement during the visual search for single features and conjunctions of features.

Abstract The present experiment investigated the attentional demands of visual search for targets defined by a single feature (feature search), or a conjunction of separable features (conjunctive search). The visual search task was based on Treisman and Gelade's (1980) visual search paradigm, which typically reveals a large interaction between search condition and display size. The present experiment differed from theirs, however, by the inclusion of a concurrent task, which was a simple detection response to an auditory probe. This concurrent task measured the involvement of central processing resources during feature and conjunctive search, from the moment the array was presented until initiating a visual search response. Marked interference effects during the first 50 msec of array presentation demonstrated the involvement of central processing resources in the two visual search conditions. Further, the data is suggestive of the notion that both feature registration and feature combination compete for our limited attentional resources.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[2]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[4]  David W. Martin,et al.  Processing demands of encoding: What does secondary task performance reflect? , 1980 .

[5]  H Gleitman,et al.  The effect of set on categorization in visual search , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation. , 1981 .

[7]  G. Logan Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. , 1985 .

[8]  C. Drury,et al.  The Effect of Area, Density, and Number of Background Characters on Visual Search , 1978, Human factors.

[9]  D. Madden Adult Age Differences in the Attentional Capacity Demands of Visual Search , 1986 .

[10]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[11]  J R Bloomfield EXPERIMENTS IN VISUAL SEARCH , 1973 .

[12]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  W H Teichner,et al.  Visual search for simple targets. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  P. McLeod A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[15]  W. Schneider,et al.  Automatic category search and its transfer. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  J. Forester,et al.  Resource allocation and the attentional demands of letter encoding. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  R. Carter Visual search with color. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  E. Farmer,et al.  Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Joan E. Regan,et al.  Automaticity and learning: Effects of familiarity on naming letters. , 1981 .

[23]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[24]  B. Green,et al.  Color coding in a visual search task. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  J. Jonides,et al.  A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .