raptr: Representative and adequate prioritization toolkit in R

1. An underlying aim in conservation planning is to maximize the long-term persistence of biodiversity. To fulfill this aim, the ecological and evolutionary processes that sustain biodiversity must be preserved. One way to conserve such processes at the feature level (eg. species, ecosystem) is to preserve a sample of the feature (eg. individuals, areas) that is representative of the intrinsic or extrinsic physical attributes that underpin the process of interest. For example, by conserving a sample of populations with local adaptations---physical attributes associated with adaptation---that is representative of the range of adaptations found in the species, protected areas can maintain adaptive processes by ensuring these adaptations are not lost. Despite this, current reserve selection methods overwhelmingly focus on securing an adequate amount of area or habitat for each feature. Little attention has been directed towards capturing a representative sample of the variation within each feature. 2. To address this issue, we developed the raptr R  package to help guide reserve selection. Users set "amount targets"---similar to conventional methods---to ensure that solutions secure a sufficient proportion of area or habitat for each feature. Additionally, users set "space targets" to secure a representative sample of variation in ecologically or evolutionarily relevant attributes (eg. environmental or genetic variation). We demonstrate the functionality of this package using simulations and two case studies. In these studies, we generated solutions using amount targets---similar to conventional methods---and compared them with solutions generated using amount and space targets. 3. Our results demonstrate that markedly different solutions emerge when targeting a representative sample of each feature. We show that using these targets is important for features that have multimodal distributions in the process-related attributes (eg. species with multimodal niches). We also found that solutions could conserve a far more representative sample with only a slight increase in reserve system size. 4. The raptr R  package provides a toolkit for making prioritizations that secure an adequate and representative sample of variation within each feature. By using solutions that secure a representative sample of each feature, prioritizations may have a greater chance of achieving long-term biodiversity persistence.

[1]  H. Possingham,et al.  Incorporating evolutionary processes into conservation planning using species distribution data: a case study with the western Mediterranean herpetofauna , 2011 .

[2]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  Ecology and life history affect different aspects of the population structure of 27 high‐alpine plants , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[3]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Incorporating consumer–resource spatial interactions in reserve design , 2009 .

[4]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Level of geographical subdivision and its effects on assessments of reserve coverage: a review of regional studies , 1994 .

[5]  P. Vos,et al.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data , 2006 .

[7]  J. Gower A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties , 1971 .

[8]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions , 2010, Oper. Res..

[9]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The Ecological Performance of Protected Areas , 2008 .

[10]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[11]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Edge artefacts and lost performance in national versus continental conservation priority areas , 2013 .

[12]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[13]  G. Orians,et al.  Endangered at What Level? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  D. P. Faith,et al.  Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Split diversity in constrained conservation prioritization using integer linear programming , 2014, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[17]  Daniel P Faith,et al.  Environmental diversity (ED) as surrogate information for species‐level biodiversity , 2003 .

[18]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization inclusive of wilderness quality: A case study of Australia’s biodiversity , 2009 .

[19]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  The ED strategy: how species‐level surrogates indicate general biodiversity patterns through an ‘environmental diversity’ perspective , 2004 .

[20]  J. Watson,et al.  The performance and potential of protected areas , 2014, Nature.

[21]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Strategic facility location: A review , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  P. Taberlet,et al.  History or ecology? Substrate type as a major driver of spatial genetic structure in Alpine plants. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[23]  B. Enquist,et al.  The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .

[24]  Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens,et al.  spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models , 2015 .

[25]  P. A. Walker,et al.  DIVERSITY: a software package for sampling phylogenetic and environmental diversity. Reference and user's guide. v. 2.1. , 1994 .

[26]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[27]  M. Hubert,et al.  "Finding Groups in Data": Cluster Analysis Extended Rousseeuw etal. , 2015 .

[28]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Relationships among levels of biodiversity and the relevance of intraspecific diversity in conservation - a project synopsis , 2008 .

[29]  Jamie B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania , 1983 .

[30]  Kimberly A. Selkoe,et al.  Evolving coral reef conservation with genetic information , 2014 .

[31]  J. Elith,et al.  Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment , 2007 .

[32]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity , 2003 .

[33]  R. Webster,et al.  Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Solving conservation planning problems with integer linear programming , 2016 .

[35]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[36]  J. Mcneely Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[37]  Craig Moritz,et al.  Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[38]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[39]  R. Frankham Inbreeding and Extinction: A Threshold Effect , 1995 .

[40]  J. Watson,et al.  Global status of and prospects for protection of terrestrial geophysical diversity , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  P. Schönswetter,et al.  Central Asian origin of and strong genetic differentiation among populations of the rare and disjunct Carex atrofusca (Cyperaceae) in the Alps , 2006 .

[42]  Jane Elith,et al.  Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data , 2005 .

[43]  H. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization of biodiversity spanning the evolutionary continuum , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[44]  Johan W. Joubert,et al.  Reconsidering environmental diversity (ED) as a biodiversity surrogacy strategy , 2016 .

[45]  C. Graham,et al.  Modeling environmentally associated morphological and genetic variation in a rainforest bird, and its application to conservation prioritization , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[46]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[47]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .