Update on breast cancer detection using comb-push ultrasound shear elastography

In this work, tissue stiffness estimates are used to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses in a group of pre-biopsy patients. The rationale is that breast masses are often stiffer than healthy tissue; furthermore, malignant masses are stiffer than benign masses. The comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE) method is used to noninvasively assess a tissue's mechanical properties. CUSE utilizes a sequence of simultaneous multiple laterally spaced acoustic radiation force (ARF) excitations and detection to reconstruct the region of interest (ROI) shear wave speed map, from which a tissue stiffness property can be quantified. In this study, the tissue stiffnesses of 73 breast masses were interrogated. The mean shear wave speeds for benign masses (3.42 ± 1.32 m/s) were lower than malignant breast masses (6.04 ± 1.25 m/s). These speed values correspond to higher stiffness in malignant breast masses (114.9 ± 40.6 kPa) than benign masses (39.4 ± 28.1 kPa and p <; 0.001), when tissue elasticity is quantified by Young's modulus. A Young's modulus >83 kPa is established as a cut-off value for differentiating between malignant and benign suspicious breast masses, with a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 89.19% sensitivity, 88.69% specificity, and 0.911 for the area under the curve (AUC).

[1]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[2]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  C. Sewell,et al.  Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  E A Sickles,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review , 1996, Cancer.

[5]  Gregg E. Trahey,et al.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: ex vivo and in vivo demonstration of transient shear wave propagation , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[6]  Kim Thomson,et al.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[7]  W. Svensson,et al.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. , 2012, Radiology.

[8]  Li Ying,et al.  Performance of Shear Wave Elastography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Solid Breast Masses , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  D. Noh,et al.  Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  Min Bai,et al.  Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  Alexandru Blidaru,et al.  Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[12]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification for Breast Lesions with Different Size , 2014, BioMed research international.

[13]  M. Fink,et al.  Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[14]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Multiwave imaging and super resolution , 2010 .

[15]  David O. Cosgrove,et al.  Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible , 2011, European Radiology.

[16]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Fast shear compounding using robust 2-D shear wave speed calculation and multi-directional filtering. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Effects of Precompression on Elasticity Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[18]  Per Skaane Breast Elastography , 2015, Acta radiologica.

[19]  2D Transient Elastography , 2002 .

[20]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[21]  B. Garra,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING. , 2011, Current medical imaging reviews.

[22]  R. Ohlinger,et al.  Ultrasound of the breast - value of sonographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of solid lesions. , 2004, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[23]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. , 2014, Radiology.

[24]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Shear Wave Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  Abd-elrahma Hassan,et al.  Benign Versus Malignant Solid Breast Masses: US Differentiation , 2015 .

[26]  Pengfei Song,et al.  Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography of Breast Masses: Initial Results Show Promise , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[28]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography. , 2015, Radiology.

[29]  M. Fink,et al.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[31]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[33]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography (CUSE) With Various Ultrasound Push Beams , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  C. Kasai,et al.  Real-Time Two-Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[36]  A. Wilson,et al.  The role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening. A consensus statement by the European Group for Breast Cancer Screening. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[37]  S Hsueh,et al.  Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[38]  A. Thompson,et al.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography (CUSE): A Novel Method for Two-Dimensional Shear Elasticity Imaging of Soft Tissues , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.