The influence of criminal facial stereotypes on juridic judgments

In order to further research into the influence of facial stereotypes on juridic judgments, we investigated the influence of face/offence congruency on such judgments, taking into account the strength of the case against the defendant and the maturity and attractiveness attributes of the defendant's face. Each participant (N = 169) read a fictitious case file that: (1) established the defendant's guilt with either a high degree of ambiguity or with a low degree of ambiguity; (2) included a photo of the defendant that was congruent with the offence or not congruent with the offence. Participants were asked to evaluate the defendant's guilt (in a dichotomous manner and on a continuous scale), to state their degree of confidence in their decision, to recommend a sentence, and to rate the attractiveness and maturity of the defendant's face. The results show that participants' judgments were affected by face/offence congruency and that this influence was not dependent on the ambiguity of the case or on the maturity or attractiveness of the face.

[1]  Reducing the Biasing Effect of Perpetrator Attractiveness in Jury Simulation , 1982 .

[2]  R. Ashmore,et al.  Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive—Social psychological conceptualization , 1979 .

[3]  M. G. Efran,et al.  The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. , 1974 .

[4]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  A. D. Yarmey.  Stereotypes and recognition memory for faces and voices of good guys and bad guys , 1993 .

[6]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[7]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[8]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Sex stereotypes and social judgment , 1980 .

[9]  Å. Hellström,et al.  Person perception through facial photographs: effects of glasses, hair, and beard on judgments of occupation and personal qualities , 1994 .

[10]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[11]  A. Feingold.  Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[12]  D. Berry.  Taking People at Face Value: Evidence for the Kernel of Truth Hypothesis , 1990 .

[13]  Z. Kunda,et al.  When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Stereotypes and the Construal of Individuating Information , 1993 .

[15]  John E. Stewart,et al.  Defendant's Attractiveness as a Factor in the Outcome of Criminal Trials: An Observational Study1 , 1980 .

[16]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy , 1982 .

[17]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[18]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  The impact of litigants' baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts , 1991 .

[19]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[20]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Coerced Confessions, Judicial Instruction, and Mock Juror Verdicts' , 1981 .

[21]  T. Millon,et al.  Personality and social psychology , 2003 .

[22]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor , 1999 .

[23]  Hadyn D. Ellis,et al.  Effect of character attribution on Photofit construction of a face , 1978 .

[24]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[25]  J. Stewart.  Appearance and Punishment: The Attraction-Leniency Effect in the Courtroom , 1985 .

[26]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. , 1975 .

[27]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[28]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  D. Berry,et al.  What's in a Face? , 1988, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

[30]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Prior Confessions and Mock Juror Verdicts , 1980 .

[31]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Do criminal stereotypes mediate juridic judgements , 1989 .

[33]  D. Shoemaker,et al.  Facial Stereotypes of Deviants and Judgments of Guilt or Innocence , 1973 .

[34]  J Blumenthal,et al.  Bright, bad, babyfaced boys: appearance stereotypes do not always yield self-fulfilling prophecy effects. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  D. Berry,et al.  Some components and consequences of a babyface. , 1985 .

[36]  Alan Feingold,et al.  The Effects of Physical Attractiveness, Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Gender of Defendants and Victims on Judgments of Mock Jurors: A Meta‐Analysis1 , 1994 .

[37]  Jennifer L. Eberhardt,et al.  Believing Is Seeing: The Effects of Racial Labels and Implicit Beliefs on Face Perception , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[38]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[39]  G. Leventhal,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Severity of Sentencing , 1977 .

[40]  P. Ekman,et al.  Measuring facial movement , 1976 .

[41]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .