Evaluation of environmental exposure models for engineered nanomaterials in a regulatory context

Abstract Exposure modeling is an important tool in the risk assessment process because it can provide information on predicted environmental concentrations (PEC values) even in the absence of analytical data. A suite of different models has been used in the last years to predict environmental flows and concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (ENM). These models can be separated into material flow models that track the flows of ENM from production and use to end-of-life processes and finally to the environment, and environmental fate models that describe the behavior within and the transfer between environmental compartments. This review presents the existing material flow and fate models for ENM and evaluates them within a regulatory context. The reliability of the models and their relevance to the regulatory process is discussed, knowledge gaps are identified and recommendations are made about the use of the models for regulation. Some of the available fate models for nanomaterials are built on concepts that are accepted by regulators for conventional chemicals, thus those nano-models are also likely accepted. A critical issue for all models is the missing validation of PEC values by analytical measurements; however, validation on a conceptual level is possible. It is recommended that the material flow models should also include information on the material characteristics, e.g. form, size distribution, and if the material has already been transformed, because this constitutes very important input information for fate models.

[1]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Simplifying modeling of nanoparticle aggregation-sedimentation behavior in environmental systems: a theoretical analysis. , 2014, Water research.

[3]  Thomas Fruergaard Astrup,et al.  Environmental exposure assessment framework for nanoparticles in solid waste , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[4]  Pierre Hennebert,et al.  Experimental evidence of colloids and nanoparticles presence from 25 waste leachates. , 2013, Waste management.

[5]  Joris T.K. Quik,et al.  Towards validation of the NanoDUFLOW nanoparticle fate model for the river Dommel, The Netherlands , 2016 .

[6]  R W Scholz,et al.  Engineered nanomaterials in rivers--exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[7]  Jamie R. Lead,et al.  Progress towards the validation of modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials by analytical measurements , 2015 .

[8]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Envisioning Nano Release Dynamics in a Changing World: Using Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling to Assess Future Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Darrell R Boverhof,et al.  A review and perspective of existing research on the release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[10]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland. , 2015, Waste management.

[11]  Peter Morfeld,et al.  Nanosilica? Clarifications are necessary! , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[12]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Theory and Methodology for Determining Nanoparticle Affinity for Heteroaggregation in Environmental Matrices Using Batch Measurements , 2014 .

[13]  Enda Cummins,et al.  Ranking initial environmental and human health risk resulting from environmentally relevant nanomaterials , 2010, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[14]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Addressing the complexity of water chemistry in environmental fate modeling for engineered nanoparticles. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[16]  K Hungerbühler,et al.  Characterization of silver release from commercially available functional (nano)textiles. , 2012, Chemosphere.

[17]  Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg,et al.  Modeling nanomaterial fate and uptake in the environment: current knowledge and future trends , 2016 .

[18]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Stochastic fate analysis of engineered nanoparticles in incineration plants , 2014 .

[19]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Application of nanoscale zero valent iron (NZVI) for groundwater remediation in Europe , 2012, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[20]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Simulation tool for assessing the release and environmental distribution of nanomaterials , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[21]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[22]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Review of the Risks Posed to Drinking Water by Man-Made Nanoparticels , 2012 .

[23]  Thomas Fruergaard Astrup,et al.  Semi-quantitative analysis of solid waste flows from nano-enabled consumer products in Europe, Denmark and the United Kingdom - Abundance, distribution and management. , 2016, Waste management.

[24]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Critical assessment of models for transport of engineered nanoparticles in saturated porous media. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  D van de Meent,et al.  Heteroaggregation and sedimentation rates for nanomaterials in natural waters. , 2014, Water research.

[26]  Melanie Kah,et al.  Nanopesticides: State of Knowledge, Environmental Fate, and Exposure Modeling , 2013 .

[27]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Are engineered nano iron oxide particles safe? an environmental risk assessment by probabilistic exposure, effects and risk modeling , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[28]  Nathalie Tufenkji,et al.  The road to nowhere: equilibrium partition coefficients for nanoparticles , 2014 .

[29]  Andrew C. Johnson,et al.  Nano silver and nano zinc-oxide in surface waters – Exposure estimation for Europe at high spatial and temporal resolution , 2015, Environmental pollution.

[30]  Dominik Saner,et al.  Persistence of engineered nanoparticles in a municipal solid-waste incineration plant. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[31]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Spatially explicit fate modelling of nanomaterials in natural waters. , 2015, Water research.

[32]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Agglomeration and sedimentation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (n-TiO2) in synthetic and real waters , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[33]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Assessing the Environmental Risks of Silver from Clothes in an Urban Area , 2014 .

[34]  E. Cummins,et al.  A Risk Assessment Framework for Assessing Metallic Nanomaterials of Environmental Concern: Aquatic Exposure and Behavior , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  B. Nowack,et al.  Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Dik van de Meent,et al.  Multimedia Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles with SimpleBox4nano: Model Definition and Evaluation , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[38]  Dik van de Meent,et al.  Natural colloids are the dominant factor in the sedimentation of nanoparticles , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[39]  Stephan Wagner,et al.  Spot the difference: engineered and natural nanoparticles in the environment--release, behavior, and fate. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[40]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Prospective life cycle assessment of graphene production by ultrasonication and chemical reduction. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  F. Christensen,et al.  Modeling Flows and Concentrations of Nine Engineered Nanomaterials in the Danish Environment , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[42]  Geert Cornelis,et al.  Fate descriptors for engineered nanoparticles: the good, the bad, and the ugly , 2015 .

[43]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Modeling nanomaterial environmental fate in aquatic systems. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Probabilistic modelling of prospective environmental concentrations of gold nanoparticles from medical applications as a basis for risk assessment , 2015, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[45]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Release of engineered nanomaterials from personal care products throughout their life cycle , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[46]  Enzo Lombi,et al.  Probabilistic modelling of engineered nanomaterial emissions to the environment: A spatio-temporal approach , 2015 .

[47]  Matthew Boyles,et al.  The oxidative potential of differently charged silver and gold nanoparticles on three human lung epithelial cell types , 2015, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[48]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  An adaptable mesocosm platform for performing integrated assessments of nanomaterial risk in complex environmental systems , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[49]  B. Jefferson,et al.  Fate of zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles in a pilot wastewater treatment plant and in processed biosolids. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Much ado about α: reframing the debate over appropriate fate descriptors in nanoparticle environmental risk modeling , 2015 .

[51]  Enda Cummins,et al.  Nano-Scale Pollutants: Fate in Irish Surface and Drinking Water Regulatory Systems , 2010 .

[52]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Physical and chemical characterization of fly ashes from Swiss waste incineration plants and determination of the ash fraction in the nanometer range. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Mobility of metallic (nano)particles in leachates from landfills containing waste incineration residues , 2017 .

[54]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[55]  B. Nowack,et al.  Review of nanomaterial aging and transformations through the life cycle of nano-enhanced products. , 2015, Environment international.

[56]  Nikolaus A. Bornhöft,et al.  A dynamic probabilistic material flow modeling method , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[57]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  A critical review of engineered nanomaterial release data: Are current data useful for material flow modeling? , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[58]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: Methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[59]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of the flows and environmental risks of nano-silica. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[60]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Development of environmental fate models for engineered nanoparticles--a case study of TiO2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[61]  Andrew C Johnson,et al.  Predicting contamination by the fuel additive cerium oxide engineered nanoparticles within the United Kingdom and the associated risks , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[62]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[63]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Prediction of nanoparticle transport behavior from physicochemical properties: machine learning provides insights to guide the next generation of transport models , 2015 .

[65]  A. Gogos,et al.  Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: current state, foreseen applications, and research priorities. , 2012, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[66]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Analysis of the occupational, consumer and environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials used in 10 technology sectors , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[67]  Jing Wang,et al.  Modeling the flows of engineered nanomaterials during waste handling. , 2013, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[68]  Till Zimmermann,et al.  Influences of use activities and waste management on environmental releases of engineered nanomaterials. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[69]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Predicted Releases of Engineered Nanomaterials: From Global to Regional to Local , 2014 .

[70]  Wendel Wohlleben,et al.  Quantitative rates of release from weathered nanocomposites are determined across 5 orders of magnitude by the matrix, modulated by the embedded nanomaterial , 2016 .

[71]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Presence of nanoparticles in wash water from conventional silver and nano-silver textiles. , 2014, ACS nano.

[72]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Impacts of a Silver‐Coated Future , 2011 .

[73]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with model natural colloids under environmentally relevant conditions. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[74]  Asger W. Nørgaard,et al.  Quantitative material releases from products and articles containing manufactured nanomaterials: Towards a release library , 2017 .

[75]  Melanie Kah,et al.  Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers: Emerging Contaminants or Opportunities for Risk Mitigation? , 2015, Front. Chem..

[76]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Stream dynamics and chemical transformations control the environmental fate of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles in a watershed-scale model. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[77]  Andrea Ulrich,et al.  Analysis of additive metals in fuel and emission aerosols of diesel vehicles with and without particle traps , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[78]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  The State of Multimedia Mass-Balance Modeling in Environmental Science and Decision-Making , 2010 .

[79]  Manuel D. Montaño,et al.  Current status and future direction for examining engineered nanoparticles in natural systems , 2014 .

[80]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing , 2009 .

[81]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Modeling nanomaterial fate in wastewater treatment: Monte Carlo simulation of silver nanoparticles (nano-Ag). , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[82]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[83]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Particle Flow Analysis , 2012 .

[84]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[85]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of risks related to waste incineration of polymer nanocomposites. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[86]  Joris T.K. Quik,et al.  Multimedia environmental fate and speciation of engineered nanoparticles: a probabilistic modeling approach , 2016 .