Bistability through Triadic Closure

We propose and analyze a class of evolving network models suitable for describing a dynamic topological structure. Applications include telecommunication, online social behavior, and information processing in neuroscience. We model the evolving network as a discrete-time Markov chain and study a very general framework in which edges conditioned on the current state appear or disappear independently at the next time step. We show how to exploit symmetries in the microscopic, localized rules in order to obtain conjugate classes of random graphs that simplify analysis and calibration of a model. Further, we develop a mean field theory for describing network evolution. For a simple but realistic scenario incorporating the triadic closure effect that has been empirically observed by social scientists (friends of friends tend to become friends), the mean field theory predicts bistable dynamics, and computational results confirm this prediction. We also discuss the calibration issue for a set of real cellphone data, and find support for a block model in which individuals are assigned to one of two distinct groups having different within-group and across-group dynamics.

[1]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007 .

[2]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks , 2009, Science.

[3]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[6]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Kenneth A. Berman,et al.  Vulnerability of scheduled networks and a generalization of Menger's Theorem , 1996, Networks.

[8]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks* , 2009, Demography.

[9]  P. Holme.  Network reachability of real-world contact sequences. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Fast Katz and Commuters: Efficient Estimation of Social Relatedness in Large Networks , 2010, WAW.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Small-world anatomical networks in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Chen Avin,et al.  How to Explore a Fast-Changing World (Cover Time of a Simple Random Walk on Evolving Graphs) , 2008, ICALP.

[13]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Social network dynamics of face-to-face interactions , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The structure of information pathways in a social communication network , 2008, KDD.

[15]  M. Newman,et al.  Mean-field solution of the small-world network model. , 1999, Physical review letters.

[16]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Michael Szell,et al.  Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[18]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[20]  Mark C. Parsons,et al.  Communicability across evolving networks. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Andrea E. F. Clementi,et al.  Flooding time in edge-Markovian dynamic graphs , 2008, PODC '08.

[22]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[23]  A. Wagner.  How the global structure of protein interaction networks evolves , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Peter Grindrod,et al.  Evolving graphs: dynamical models, inverse problems and propagation , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[28]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[29]  Wei Tang,et al.  Supervised Link Prediction Using Multiple Sources , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[30]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Andrea E. F. Clementi,et al.  Information Spreading in Stationary Markovian Evolving Graphs , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[32]  V Latora,et al.  Small-world behavior in time-varying graphs. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Analysing information flows and key mediators through temporal centrality metrics , 2010, SNS '10.

[34]  Gilbert Strang,et al.  Computational Science and Engineering , 2007 .