Local Projection Stabilization for the Stokes System on Anisotropic Quadrilateral Meshes

The local projection stabilization (LPS) is suitable to stabilize the saddle point structure of the Stokes system when equal-order finite elements are used, as well as convective terms for Navier-Stokes. Hence, it has already been applied with large success to different fields of computational fluid dynamics, e.g., in 3D incompressible flows [7], compressible flows [12], reactive flows [8], parameter estimation [4, 5] and optimal control problems [11]. Although locally refined meshes have been used for this stabilization technique in all of these applications, the meshes have been isotropic so far. The solution of partial differential equations on anisotropic meshes are of substantial importance for efficient solutions of problems with interior layers or boundary layers, as for instance in fluid dynamics at higher Reynolds number. It is well known that stabilized finite element schemes, e.g. streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG), see [10], or pressure stabilized Petrov-Galerkin (PSPG), see [9], must be modified in the case of anisotropy. Becker has shown in [2] how the PSPG stabilization should be modified on anisotropic Cartesian grids. In this work, we make the first step of formulating LPS on anisotropic quadrilateral meshes by considering the Stokes system in the domain Ω ⊂ R for velocity v and pressure p:

[1]  R. Becker,et al.  Numerical parameter estimation for chemical models in multidimensional reactive flows , 2004 .

[2]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuscka-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of , 1986 .

[3]  Thomas Richter Parallel Multigrid Method for Adaptive Finite Elements with Application to 3D Flow Problems , 2005 .

[4]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Modelling of natural convection flows with large temperature differences: A benchmark problem for low Mach number solvers. Part 2. Contributions to the June 2004 conference , 2005 .

[5]  T. Richter,et al.  SOLUTIONS OF 3D NAVIER-STOKES BENCHMARK PROBLEMS WITH ADAPTIVE FINITE ELEMENTS , 2006 .

[6]  Malte Braack,et al.  Stabilized finite elements for 3D reactive flows , 2006 .

[7]  Roland Becker,et al.  A finite element pressure gradient stabilization¶for the Stokes equations based on local projections , 2001 .

[8]  Karl Kunisch,et al.  Optimal Vortex Reduction for Instationary Flows Based on Translation Invariant Cost Functionals , 2007, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[9]  Roland Becker,et al.  Parameter identification for chemical models in combustion problems , 2005 .

[10]  Malte Braack Anisotropic H1-Stable Projections on Quadrilateral Meshes , 2006 .

[11]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG , 1986 .

[12]  Jukka Saranen,et al.  Streamline diffusion methods for the incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations , 1986 .

[13]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Modelling of natural convection flows with large temperature differences : a benchmark problem for low Mach number solvers. Part 1, Reference solutions , 2005 .