Male Genital Allometry in Scathophagidae (Diptera)

[1]  D. Hosken,et al.  Co‐evolution of male and female reproductive characters across the Scathophagidae (Diptera) , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[2]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Sexual selection and the allometry of earwig forceps , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[3]  A. McElligott,et al.  Bat genitalia: allometry, variation and good genes , 2004 .

[4]  A. Córdoba‐Aguilar,et al.  Sexual selection and animal genitalia. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  The limits of elaboration: curved allometries reveal the constraints on mandible size in stag beetles , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual selection and genital evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Tortoise beetle genitalia and demonstrations of a sexually selected advantage for flagellum length in Chelymorpha alternans (Chrysomelidae, Cassidini, Stolaini) , 2004, New Developments in the Biology of Chrysomelidae.

[8]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  Environmental influences on the gametic investment of yellow dung fly males , 2002, Evolutionary Ecology.

[9]  P. Stockley.  Sperm competition risk and male genital anatomy: comparative evidence for reduced duration of female sexual receptivity in primates with penile spines , 2002, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  L. Simmons,et al.  Copula duration and testes size in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (L.) : the effects of diet, body size, and mating history , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  G. Parker,et al.  Dung fly struggles: Evidence for assessment strategy , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  K. Lunau,et al.  Signalling fitness: larger males sire more offspring. Studies of the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diopsidae, Diptera) , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the yellow dung fly , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[14]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Relative testis size and sperm morphometry across mammals: no evidence for an association between sperm competition and sperm length , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  L. Simmons,et al.  Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Richard Vermette,et al.  Functional morphology of sexually selected gentalia in the water strider Aquarius remigis , 2003 .

[17]  R. Bernstein,et al.  ALLOMETRY OF MALE GENITALIA IN A SPECIES OF SOLDIER BEETLE: SUPPORT FOR THE ONE‐SIZE‐FITS‐ALL HYPOTHESIS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  Geographical and altitudinal population genetic structure of two dung fly species with contrasting mobility and temperature preference , 2002, Heredity.

[19]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Measuring relative investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  POPULATION VARIATION IN SEXUAL SELECTION AND ITS EFFECT ON SIZE ALLOMETRY IN TWO DUNG FLY SPECIES WITH CONTRASTING SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  H. Tatsuta,et al.  Allometric Patterns of Heads and Genitalia in the Stag Beetle Lucanus maculifemoratus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) , 2001 .

[23]  D. Hosken,et al.  Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition , 2001 .

[24]  W. Eberhard.  SPECIES‐SPECIFIC GENITALIC COPULATORY COURTSHIP IN SEPSID FLIES (DIPTERA, SEPSIDAE, MICROSEPSIS) AND THEORIES OF GENITALIC EVOLUTION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  P. Ward,et al.  Phylogeny of the scathophagidae (Diptera, calyptratae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[26]  G. Schmitz,et al.  Allometric Relationship Between Genitalic Size and Body Size in Two Species of Mordellid Beetles (Coleoptera: Mordellidae) , 2000 .

[27]  Extreme body size variability in the golden silk spider ( Nephila edulis ) does not extend to genitalia , 2000 .

[28]  J. Godin,et al.  Geographical variation in the male intromittent organ of the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2000 .

[29]  E. Meyer,et al.  Internal female reproductive anatomy and genital interactions during copula in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae) , 1999 .

[30]  J. Losos.  Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  A. Green.  ALLOMETRY OF GENITALIA IN INSECTS AND SPIDERS: ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  DON'T FORGET THE BIOLOGY: A REPLY TO GREEN , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  I. Danielsson,et al.  Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  COPULATORY BEHAVIOR, GENITAL MORPHOLOGY, AND MALE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS IN WATER STRIDERS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  D. Hosken,et al.  Testes mass in megachiropteran bats varies in accordance with sperm competition theory , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  G. Arnqvist.  Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection , 1998, Nature.

[37]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta) , 1998 .

[38]  W. Eberhard,et al.  ONE SIZE FITS ALL? RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SIZE AND DEGREE OF VARIATION IN GENITALIA AND OTHER BODY PARTS IN TWENTY SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  M. Otronen.  Male asymmetry and postcopulatory sexual selection in the fly Dryomyza anilis , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  M. Gage.  Influences of sex, size, and symmetry on ejaculate expenditure in a moth , 1998 .

[41]  W. Eberhard.  3 – Female Roles in Sperm Competition , 1998 .

[42]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm Competition in Fishes: The Evolution of Testis Size and Ejaculate Characteristics , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[44]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sperm competition in bats , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  W. Eberhard.  The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice in insects and arachnids , 1997 .

[46]  W. Eberhard.  Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice , 1996 .

[47]  L. Rowe,et al.  The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  S. Pitnick.  Investment in Testes and the Cost of Making Long Sperm in Drosophila , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[49]  G. Parker,et al.  Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations , 1995 .

[50]  A. Møller,et al.  A resolution of the lek paradox , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  M. Gage.  Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  W. Eberhard.  EVIDENCE FOR WIDESPREAD COURTSHIP DURING COPULATION IN 131 SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  M. Petrie.  Are all secondary sexual display structures positively allometric and, if so, why? , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  A. Green.  Positive allometry is likely with mate choice, competitive display and other functions , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[56]  G. Arnqvist.  Sexual Selection in a Water Strider: The Function, Mechanism of Selection and Heritability of a Male Grasping Apparatus , 1989 .

[57]  J. Höglund,et al.  Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birds , 1988 .

[58]  M. Petrie.  Intraspecific variation in structures that display competitive ability: large animals invest relatively more , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[60]  S. Larson,et al.  Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates , 1981, Nature.

[61]  M. Rab.  Morphology of the male terminalia of scatophaga stercoraria diptera scatophagidae , 1979 .

[62]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .

[63]  W. Hackman.  The Scatophagidae (Dipt.) of Eastern Fennoscandia , 1956 .

[64]  P. Smith,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[65]  C. Darwin.  The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .