Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 2: Uncertainty assessment

Abstract. A comparison among three methods for the calibration of tri-axial accelerometers, in particular MEMS, is presented in this paper, paying attention to the uncertainty assessment of each method. The first method is performed according to the ISO 16063 standards. Two innovative methods are analysed, both suitable for in-field application. The effects on the whole uncertainty of the following aspects have been evaluated: the test bench performances in realizing the reference motion, the vibration reference sensor, the geometrical parameters and the data processing techniques. The uncertainty contributions due to the offset and the transverse sensitivity are also studied, by calibrating two different types of accelerometers, a piezoelectric one and a capacitive one, to check their effect on the accuracy of the methods under comparison. The reproducibility of methods is demonstrated. Relative uncertainty of methods ranges from 3 to 5 %, depending on the complexity of the model and of the requested operations. The results appear promising for low-cost calibration of new tri-axial accelerometers of MEMS type.

[1]  Li Ning Sun,et al.  Micromachined Tri-Axis Capacitive Accelerometer Based on the Single Mass , 2015 .

[2]  Naveen Garg,et al.  Low frequency Accelerometer Calibration using an optical encoder sensor , 2017 .

[3]  Emanuela Natale,et al.  Calibration Uncertainty of Three-Axis Low Frequency Accelerometers: Test Rig and Procedure Aspects , 2014 .

[4]  Ting Ting Wang,et al.  A New Design of a Piezoelectric Triaxial Micro-Accelerometer , 2015 .

[5]  Emanuela Natale,et al.  Dynamic calibration uncertainty of three-axis low frequency accelerometers , 2015 .

[6]  Saeed Ebadollahi,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of MEMS accelerometer by determining its nonlinear coefficients using centrifuge test , 2017 .

[7]  Kseniya I. Goryanina,et al.  Stochastic approach to reducing calibration errors of MEMS orientation sensors , 2017, 2017 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS).

[8]  Jaromír Škuta,et al.  Calibration of MEMs accelerometer with digital output , 2017, 2017 18th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC).

[9]  Emanuela Natale,et al.  Accuracy improvement in a calibration test bench for accelerometers by a vision system , 2016 .

[10]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[11]  Emanuela Natale,et al.  Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 1: comparison among methods , 2018 .

[12]  Emanuela Natale,et al.  Validation of a method for composition measurement of a non-standard liquid fuel for Emission Factor evaluation , 2011 .

[13]  Steven W. Su,et al.  An Efficient Autocalibration Method for Triaxial Accelerometer , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Emanuela Natale,et al.  Evaluation of aspects affecting measurement of three-axis accelerometers , 2016 .