Curb Your Innovation: Corporate Conservatism in the Presence of Imperfect Intellectual Property Rights

In this Paper we analyse the effects of information leakage on the incentives to innovate in firms. We analyse a situation in which an employee in a firm is inspired with a new idea for a product. In a framework in which Intellectual Property Rights on ideas are absent, we analyse the employee’s decision of whether to disclose the idea within the firm or to form a spin-out. We next look at the shareholders of the original firm and analyse their incentives to promote creativity and innovations among employees. Our analysis highlights the effects of the distribution of shares within the firm and the firm’s size on the incentives and behaviour of firms towards innovation. In particular we highlight the following findings. (i) Often employees may not implement an idea either within or outside the firm. (ii) The ownership structure affects the incentives to promote innovation in firms. (iii) Firm shareholders may have incentives to curtail innovation even if these innovations are expected to be revealed within the firm. (iv) Firms may buy-off potential innovative agents, by providing them with compensation plans that dominate leaving the firm, or revealing new ideas within the firm. (v) Information leakage concerns affect both the hiring and the information provision decisions of the firm.

[1]  James J. Anton,et al.  Start-ups, Spin-offs, and Internal Projects , 1995 .

[2]  Raghuram G. Rajan,et al.  The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy: A Theory of the Origin and Growth of Firms , 1998 .

[3]  David K. Levine,et al.  Rent-seeking and innovation , 2003 .

[4]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  Bargaining in Legislatures , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[5]  Tracy R. Lewis,et al.  Innovation, Knowledge Flow, and Worker Mobility , 2003 .

[6]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Patent Policy and Costly Imitation , 1992 .

[7]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[8]  Louis Kaplow,et al.  Antitrust Analysis: Problems, Text, Cases , 1968 .

[9]  S. Modica KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN R&D OUTSOURCING (AND LINUX–VS–WINDOWS) , 2003 .

[10]  Eric L. Talley,et al.  Trade Secrets and Mutual Investments , 2000 .

[11]  Varadarajan V. Chari,et al.  Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Competitive Diffusion , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Innovation and Incentives , 2004 .

[14]  A. Wolinsky A Theory of the Firm with Non-Binding Employment Contracts , 2000 .

[15]  April M. Franco,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through Employee Mobility , 2000 .

[16]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  S. Modica knowledge transfer in R&D outsourcing (and Linux versus Windows) , 2004 .

[18]  K. Dau-Schmidt,et al.  High Velocity Labor Economics: A Review Essay of Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market , 2004 .

[19]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[20]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  Bargaining and Markets , 1991 .

[21]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[22]  S. Mehta The Law of One Price and a Theory of the Firm , 1998 .

[23]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[24]  Janusz A. Ordover,et al.  A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion , 1991 .

[25]  Ján Zábojník A Theory of Trade Secrets in Firms , 2000 .

[26]  Claude d'Aspremont,et al.  Bargaining and Sharing Innovative Knowledge , 2000 .

[27]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[28]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Strategic Experimentation and Disruptive Technological Change , 2005 .

[29]  S. Klepper Employee Startups in High‐Tech Industries , 2001 .

[30]  James J. Anton,et al.  Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights , 1994 .

[31]  James J. Anton,et al.  The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Contracting , 2002 .

[32]  Sudipto Bhattacharya,et al.  Knowledge Disclosure, Patents and Optimal Organization of Research and Development , 2004 .

[33]  Mariagiovanna Baccara,et al.  From Thought to Practice: Appropriation and Endogenous Market Structure with Imperfect Intellectual Property Rights , 2002 .

[34]  April Franco,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through Employee Mobility , 2000 .

[35]  Silvio Micali,et al.  Proofs that yield nothing but their validity or all languages in NP have zero-knowledge proof systems , 1991, JACM.

[36]  Shmuel Nitzan,et al.  Optimum Contracts for Research Personnel, Research Employment, and the Establishment of "Rival" Enterprises , 1982, Journal of Labor Economics.

[37]  Tom Lee,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation , 1980 .

[38]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Management of Innovation , 1994 .

[39]  Optimum Contracts for Research Personnel, Research Employment, and the Establishment of "Rival" Enterprises , 1982, Journal of Labor Economics.

[40]  Lars Stole,et al.  Intra-firm Bargaining under Non-binding Contracts , 1996 .

[41]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D , 1980 .

[42]  Michele Boldrin,et al.  Perfectly Competitive Innovation , 2002 .

[43]  Krishna B. Kumar,et al.  What Determines Firm Size? , 1999 .

[44]  J. Stein,et al.  Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized vs. Hierarchical Firms , 2000 .

[45]  Stanley M. Besen,et al.  An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property , 1991 .