The Potential of Virtual Reality to Assess Functional Communication in Aphasia

Speech–language pathologists (SLPs) who work with adults with cognitive-linguistic impairments, including aphasia, have long needed an assessment tool that predicts ability to function in the real world. In this article, it is argued that virtual reality (VR)-supported approaches can address this need. Using models of disability such as the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the Disability Creation Process model, a case is made for using VR to reconstruct daily communicative events, thereby capturing situations of life events. A case is also made for using virtual environments to systematically assess the impact of environmental factors that can be enablers or obstacles to successful functional communication. Before embarking on tool development, opinions of clinical SLPs were sought using a discussion group format. The Communication Abilities of Daily Living (CADL) test was proposed as an example to follow for the reconstruction of daily communication events. Clinicians were asked to discuss scenes that might be amenable to VR, while considering practical clinical needs. There was a clear interest in the development of a VR tool with a preference to assess functions that were not easily observable in clinic (e.g., financial transactions, transportation, and safety in contexts of risk). Discussants stressed the importance of developing a tool for different target populations, as well as technical features such as being able to regulate speed and level of difficulty. The potential use of VR tools for both assessment and therapy is discussed. It is argued that VR will offer clinicians the opportunity to assess functions not possible with paper-and-pencil tests.

[1]  L. Leonard,et al.  Diagnostic and Treatment Implications of an Analysis of Aphasic Adults' Contextual Language Comprehension , 1978 .

[2]  L. Rothi,et al.  Variability of Performance on The Porch Index of Communicative Ability , 1981 .

[3]  A. Kertesz The Western Aphasia Battery , 1982 .

[4]  A. Holland Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  M. McTear Pragmatic disorders: a question of direction. , 1985, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[6]  R. McCauley,et al.  Psychometric review of nine aphasia tests. , 1985, Journal of communication disorders.

[7]  M. Wilcox,et al.  Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics , 1985 .

[8]  J Lomas,et al.  The communicative effectiveness index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[9]  C. Sheard,et al.  Pragmatic assessment in adult aphasia: A clinical review , 1992 .

[10]  C. Frattali Functional assessment of communication: Merging public policy with clinical views , 1992 .

[11]  A. Kagan,et al.  Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. , 1995, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[12]  Cynthia K. Thompson,et al.  Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adult , 1995 .

[13]  Michael Zyda,et al.  Virtual Reality: In the Mind of the Beholder - Guest Editors' Introduction , 1995, Computer.

[14]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[15]  Jörn Ostermann,et al.  User evaluation: Synthetic talking faces for interactive services , 1999, The Visual Computer.

[16]  J. Duchan,et al.  Life Participation Approach to Aphasia: A Statement of Values for the Future , 2000 .

[17]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Virtual environment applications in clinical neuropsychology , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[18]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  Focus group exploration of presence through advanced broadcast services , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Issues for the Assessment of Visuospatial Skills in Older Adults Using Virtual Environment Technology , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  E. Yiu,et al.  Effectiveness of functional communication therapy by volunteers for people with aphasia following stroke , 2000 .

[21]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Communicating with Autonomous Virtual Humans , 2000 .

[22]  Masahiko Inami,et al.  Visuo-haptic display using head-mounted projector , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[23]  Myeung-Sook Yoh,et al.  The reality of virtual reality , 2001, Proceedings Seventh International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia.

[24]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Performance-Driven Facial Animation: Basic Research on Human Judgments of Emotional State in Facial Avatars , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Relevance is in the eye and ear of the beholder: An example from populations with a neurological impairment , 2001 .

[26]  A. Rizzo,et al.  The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. , 2001 .

[27]  D. Howard,et al.  Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation , 2002 .

[28]  B. Rende,et al.  Measuring transactional success in the conversation of people with aphasia , 2002 .

[29]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing , 2002 .

[30]  Andrea Gaggioli,et al.  Avatars in Clinical Psychology: A Framework for the Clinical Use of Virtual Humans , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  R. Teasell,et al.  Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery , 2003, Stroke.

[32]  Jeonghun Ku,et al.  A Virtual Reality System for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Activities of Daily Living , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  D. Howard,et al.  Combining lexical and interactional approaches to therapy for word finding deficits in aphasia , 2003 .

[34]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[35]  Lynne Mitchell,et al.  The Accessibility of Public Spaces for People with Dementia: A new priority for the 'open city' , 2003 .

[36]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[37]  Brian Hobbs,et al.  Developing a Virtual Reality-Based Methodology for People with Dementia: A Feasibility Study , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[38]  C. Wallesch,et al.  Computers in aphasia therapy: Effects and side‐effects , 2004 .

[39]  Dorothy Strickland,et al.  The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[40]  G. Chard International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[41]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[42]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Virtual Reality Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Phobia: A Preliminary Controlled Study , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[43]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Virtual humans: thirty years of research, what next? , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[44]  R. Kane Standardized and flexible batteries in neuropsychology: An assessment update , 1991, Neuropsychology Review.

[45]  Patrice Renaud,et al.  Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure in the treatment of arachnophobia using 3D games. , 2006, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[46]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  State of the Art in Virtual Rehabilitation , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[47]  A. Boonen,et al.  The international classification for functioning, disability and health , 2007, Clinical Rheumatology.