Competencies for Innovating in the 21st Century

This is the first paper in a four-part series focused on a competency-based approach for personalized education in a group setting. In this paper, we focus on identifying the competencies and meta-competencies required for the 21 st century engineers. These competencies are the ability to be able perform a specific task, action or function successfully. In the second paper, we provide an overview of an approach to developing competencies needed for the fast changing world and allowing the students to be in charge of their own learning. The approach fosters “learning how to learn” in a collaborative environment. We believe that two of the core competencies required for success in the dynamically changing workplace are the abilities to identify and manage dilemmas. In the third paper, we discuss our approach for helping students learn how to identify dilemmas in the context of an energy policy design problem. The fourth paper is focused on approaches to developing the competency to manage dilemmas associated with the realization of complex, sustainable, socio-techno-eco systems. A deep understanding of innovation-related competencies will be required if we are to meet the needs of our graduates in preparing them for the challenges of the 21 st century. In recent years development of competencies for innovation, especially in engineering, has received signification attention. The nature of innovation and its components needs to be identified and analyzed to determine proper ways to nurture and develop them in engineering students. There are two levels of competencies in any professional field, field-specific task competencies, and generalized skill sets, or meta-competencies. The task-specific competencies are benchmarks for graduates in a given field. Their level of attainment defines how well graduates are prepared to meet job demands and excel in the future. The general (meta) competencies are skill sets that enable them to function more globally, such as to work with others, function in organizations and meet organizational demands, and transfer task-specific skills to new challenges they have not encountered before. 1. Frame of Reference In this paper we will explore the key question: How can we foster learning how to learn and develop competencies? We focus especially on those competencies which are needed for engineers in the future beginning with an understanding of innovation. 1.1 Innovation – What is it?

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  F. Evers,et al.  The Bases of Competence , 1996 .

[3]  Jeff Howe,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2008, Human Resource Management International Digest.

[4]  Diran Apelian,et al.  Re-engineering engineering education for the challenges of the 21st century , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Managing Dilemmas Embodied in 21st Century Engineering , 2012 .

[6]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[7]  Thomas L. Friedman,et al.  Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution—And How It Can Renew America , 2008 .

[8]  T. Friedman.  The World Is Flat [Updated and Expanded]: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century , 2006 .

[9]  John McMasters,et al.  Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers , 1998 .

[10]  Wm. A. Wulf,et al.  A Makeover for Engineering Education. , 2002 .

[11]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Strategic Design of Engineering Education for the Flat World , 2008 .

[12]  Malcolm Allan.  The Development of Competencies for Engineers within a Global Context , 2008 .

[13]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[14]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[15]  Eden Fisher,et al.  New Perspectives on Teaching Innovation to Engineers: An Exploration of Mental Models of Innovation Experts , 2011 .

[16]  Christopher B. Williams,et al.  Empowering Students to Learn How to Learn: Mass Customization of Graduate Engineering Design Course , 2006 .

[17]  J. Earnest.  ABET engineering technology criteria and competency based engineering education , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[18]  Domenico Grasso,et al.  Holistic Engineering Education , 2010 .

[19]  R. Voorhees,et al.  Defining and Assessing Learning: Exploring Competency-Based Initiatives. Report of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on Competency-Based Initiatives in Postsecondary Education. Brochure [and] Report. , 2002 .

[20]  E. Deci,et al.  INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: CLASSIC DEFINITION AND NEW DIRECTION , 2000 .

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Toward Mass Customization in the Age of Information: The Case for Open Engineering Systems , 1997 .

[22]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives , 2006 .

[23]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[24]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[25]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Product Realization in the Age of Mass Collaboration , 2008, DAC 2008.

[26]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[27]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[28]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[29]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance , 2006 .

[30]  C. Bao Iturbe,et al.  Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[31]  G. M. Warnick.  Global Competence: Its Importance For Engineers Working In A Global Environment , 2011 .

[32]  J. Duderstadt.  Engineering for a Changing World , 2010 .

[33]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently , 2006 .

[34]  B. Zimmerman.  Development and Adaptation of Expertise: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs. , 2006 .

[35]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[36]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Developing Competencies for the 21st Century Engineer , 2012 .

[37]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Identifying Dilemmas Embodied in 21st Century Engineering , 2012 .

[38]  Johann Füller,et al.  Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[39]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Diversifying the Engineering Workforce , 2005 .

[40]  MaryAnn McLaughlin,et al.  Employability Skills Profile: What Are Employers Looking For?. , 1995 .

[41]  D. Krathwohl.  A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[42]  Cathleen Benko,et al.  Mass Career Customization: Aligning the Workplace With Today's Nontraditional Workforce , 2007 .

[43]  Malcolm Allan,et al.  Achieving Engineering Competencies in the Global Information Society through the Integration of On-Campus and Workplace Environments , 2008 .