On the effect of local barrier height in scanning tunneling microscopy: Measurement methods and control implications.

A common cause of tip-sample crashes in a Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) operating in constant current mode is the poor performance of its feedback control system. We show that there is a direct link between the Local Barrier Height (LBH) and robustness of the feedback control loop. A method known as the "gap modulation method" was proposed in the early STM studies for estimating the LBH. We show that the obtained measurements are affected by controller parameters and propose an alternative method which we prove to produce LBH measurements independent of the controller dynamics. We use the obtained LBH estimation to continuously update the gains of a STM proportional-integral (PI) controller and show that while tuning the PI gains, the closed-loop system tolerates larger variations of LBH without experiencing instability. We report experimental results, conducted on two STM scanners, to establish the efficiency of the proposed PI tuning approach. Improved feedback stability is believed to help in avoiding the tip/sample crash in STMs.

[1]  Fernando Flores,et al.  Electron-metal-surface interaction potential with vacuum tunneling: Observation of the image force , 1984 .

[2]  Xi Chen,et al.  Experimental demonstration of topological surface states protected by time-reversal symmetry. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[3]  D. Eigler,et al.  Measurement of Fast Electron Spin Relaxation Times with Atomic Resolution , 2010, Science.

[4]  Gerd Karl Binnig,et al.  Scanning Tunneling Microscopy , 1996 .

[5]  Gérard-André Capolino,et al.  Variable structure control of a piezoelectric actuator for a scanning tunneling microscope , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  S. O. Reza Moheimani,et al.  A self-tuning controller for high-performance scanning tunneling microscopy , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA).

[7]  S. S. Aphale,et al.  High-bandwidth control of a piezoelectric nanopositioning stage in the presence of plant uncertainties , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[8]  H. Ryu,et al.  Ohm’s Law Survives to the Atomic Scale , 2012, Science.

[9]  D. Thompson,et al.  Lithography and doping in strained Si towards atomically precise device fabrication , 2014, Nanotechnology.

[10]  R. Wolkow,et al.  Direct observation of an increase in buckled dimers on Si(001) at low temperature. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[11]  A. Oliva,et al.  Analysis of scanning tunneling microscopy feedback system , 1995 .

[12]  P. Hansma,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy and atomic force microscopy: application to biology and technology. , 1988, Science.

[13]  W. R. Owen,et al.  Multimode hydrogen depassivation lithography: A method for optimizing atomically precise write times , 2013 .

[14]  M. Y. Simmons,et al.  A single atom transistor , 2012, 2012 IEEE Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (SNW).

[15]  Miguel Aguilar,et al.  Optimal conditions for imaging in scanning tunneling microscopy: Theory , 1998 .

[16]  Yoshihito Maeda,et al.  Local barrier height of Au nanoparticles on a TiO2(1 1 0)-(1×2) surface , 2004 .

[17]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Robust Adaptive Control , 2012 .

[18]  John R. Tucker,et al.  Nanoscale patterning and oxidation of H‐passivated Si(100)‐2×1 surfaces with an ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscope , 1994 .

[19]  Yue Cao,et al.  Variable Temperature Scanning Tunneling Microscope study on CDW material 2H-TaSe$_2$ , 2011 .

[20]  Alina Voda,et al.  Subnanometer Positioning and Drift Compensation With Tunneling Current , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[21]  D. Nečas,et al.  Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis , 2012 .

[22]  D. Jaeger,et al.  Field-directed sputter sharpening for tailored probe materials and atomic-scale lithography , 2012, Nature Communications.

[23]  John N. Randall,et al.  Atomic precision lithography on Si , 2009 .

[24]  Michael G. Ruppert,et al.  A review of demodulation techniques for amplitude-modulation atomic force microscopy , 2017, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[25]  Lang Nd,et al.  Apparent barrier height in scanning tunneling microscopy. , 1988 .

[26]  M. Moors,et al.  Scanning Probe Microscopy , 2020, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics.

[27]  E. Anguiano,et al.  Experimental determination of the parameters of the feedback system of a scanning tunnelling microscope , 1997 .