Improving fitness: Mapping research priorities against societal needs on obesity

Science policy is increasingly shifting towards an emphasis in societal problems or grand challenges. As a result, new evaluative tools are needed to help assess not only the knowledge production side of research programmes or organisations, but also the articulation of research agendas with societal needs. In this paper, we present an exploratory investigation of science supply and societal needs on the grand challenge of obesity -an emerging health problem with enormous social costs. We illustrate a potential approach that uses topic modelling to explore: (a) how scientific publications can be used to describe existing priorities in science production; (b) how records of questions posed in the European parliament can be used as an instance of mapping discourse of social needs; (c) how the comparison between the two may show (mis)alignments between societal concerns and scientific outputs. While this is a technical exercise, we propose that this type of mapping methods can be useful for informing strategic planning and evaluation in funding agencies.

[1]  Christopher W Belter,et al.  The Productivity of NHLBI‐Funded Obesity Research, 1983‐2013 , 2016, Obesity.

[2]  David Tyfield,et al.  A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis , 2012, Minerva.

[3]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Clustering More than Two Million Biomedical Publications: Comparing the Accuracies of Nine Text-Based Similarity Approaches , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[5]  Tran Quoc Bao,et al.  Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants , 2016, The Lancet.

[6]  Camille Roth,et al.  Streams of Media Issues, Monitoring World Food Security , 2011 .

[7]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Jessica Tran,et al.  Do Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Cause Obesity and Diabetes? Industry and the Manufacture of Scientific Controversy , 2016, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  D. Blei,et al.  Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding , 2013 .

[11]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping altruism , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Comparison of topic extraction approaches and their results , 2017, Scientometrics.

[13]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Towards Innovation Democracy? Participation, Responsibility and Precaution in Innovation Governance. , 2014 .

[14]  I. Ràfols,et al.  Towards indicators for ‘ opening up ’ science and technology policy , 2012 .

[15]  Kenneth E. Shirley,et al.  LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics , 2014 .

[16]  W. Willett,et al.  Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications , 2013, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[17]  Erik Millstone,et al.  Policy options for responding to obesity: cross-national report of the PorGrow project , 2006 .

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[20]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Co‐word maps and topic modeling: A comparison using small and medium‐sized corpora (N < 1,000) , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  W. James,et al.  WHO recognition of the global obesity epidemic , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[22]  Michel Zitt.  Meso-level retrieval: IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[23]  M. Siegel,et al.  Sponsorship of National Health Organizations by Two Major Soda Companies. , 2017, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Under-Reporting Research Relevant to Local Needs in The Global South. Database Biases in the Representation of Knowledge on Rice , 2020, ISSI.

[25]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[26]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A delineating procedure to retrieve relevant publication data in research areas: the case of nanocellulose , 2016, Scientometrics.

[27]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Database of NIH grants using machine-learned categories and graphical clustering , 2011, Nature Methods.

[28]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010 .

[29]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  Matthew L. Wallace,et al.  Research Portfolio Analysis in Science Policy: Moving from Financial Returns to Societal Benefits , 2014 .

[31]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Shaping the Agenda of a Grand Challenge: Institutional Mediation of Priorities in Avian Influenza Research. , 2016 .

[32]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer , 2011, ArXiv.

[33]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2011, KDD '11 Tutorials.

[34]  A. Stirling,et al.  Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation , 2014 .

[35]  Barry M. Popkin,et al.  The World Is Fat: The Fads, Trends, Policies, and Products That Are Fattening the Human Race , 2008 .

[36]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[37]  Arnaud Basdevant.  Plan obésité : impulser, mobiliser et après ? , 2013 .