Evolution, roots and influence of the literature on National Systems of Innovation: a bibliometric account

The literature on the National Systems of Innovation (NSI) is a relatively new field of research that has spread remarkably in the past 20 years. This article offers a complementary, quantitative description of the state-of-the-art of the literature based on bibliometric methods, by explicitly addressing the roots, evolution and influence of NSI literature. The exercise shows that over time the rate of published articles was quite irregular and that contributions on NSI have not (yet) converged to an integrated analytical framework. Although historically detailed descriptions on NSI showed a noticeable increase in the more recent period (2006–2010) analyses using more formal and diversified quantitative methodologies for assessing the performance of NSI remained lacking, reflecting its persisting methodological weaknesses. The roots of the NSI literature can be found at the core of innovation studies by certain well-known scholars in the area of economics of innovation and science policy research. Even though publications on NSI are falling in relative importance and are highly concentrated on a small set of countries (United Kingdom, Denmark, and the United States), their influence is global. They are cited by authors affiliated in organisations around the world, notably in Latin America and Asia. Such an influence goes far beyond the area of innovation studies and has resonated in fields such as economic geography, environmental studies, international business and managerial sciences. This demonstrates that the NSI literature is not self-referential.

[1]  Ludovico Alcorta,et al.  Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean , 1998 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[3]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[4]  B. Lundvall Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction , 1985 .

[5]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  High Technology Policies: A Five Nation Comparison. , 1986 .

[6]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[7]  M. Trevor Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan , 1989 .

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[9]  When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations Ernst B. Haas Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990, pp. xii, 266 , 1990, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[10]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The competitive advantage of , 1990 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[13]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. , 1991 .

[14]  P. Haas Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination , 1992, International Organization.

[15]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[16]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program , 1992, International Organization.

[17]  Dennis A. Rondinelli,et al.  National innovation systems: A comparative analysis , 1993 .

[18]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[19]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[20]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[21]  F. Schwartz The Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[22]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[23]  Changes in Japanese Government policies to be a front-runner in science and technology , 1998 .

[24]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Why Study National Systems and National Styles of Innovation , 1998 .

[25]  Francisco J. Arcelus,et al.  Interrelationships among the elements of national innovation systems: A statistical evaluation , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Slavo Radosevic,et al.  Transformation of science and technology systems into systems of innovation in central and eastern Europe: the emerging patterns and determinants , 1999 .

[27]  Johan Hauknes Innovation systems and capabilities , 1999 .

[28]  Henrik Sornn-Friese,et al.  FRONTIERS OF RESEARCH IN INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS AND NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION1 , 2000 .

[29]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[30]  F. J. Arcelus,et al.  On the Stability of Countries’ National Technological Systems , 2000 .

[31]  Xielin Liu,et al.  Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context , 2001 .

[32]  Philip Mirowski Machine Dreams Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science , 2001 .

[33]  W. Eichhorst,et al.  Benchmarking Deutschland: Arbeitsmarkt und Beschäftigung , 2001 .

[34]  Charles Edquist,et al.  The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art , 2001 .

[35]  Christian Rammer,et al.  Benchmarking industry—science relations: the role of framework conditions , 2001 .

[36]  M. Porter,et al.  National Innovative Capacity , 2001 .

[37]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[38]  Bruce J. Caldwell,et al.  How Economics Became a Mathematical Science , 2020 .

[39]  P. Intarakumnerd,et al.  National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand , 2002 .

[40]  C. Freeman Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems--complementarity and economic growth , 2002 .

[41]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion: The Danish Model , 2002 .

[42]  E. B. Viotti National Learning Systems - A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea , 2002 .

[43]  Shyama V. Ramani,et al.  Country-Specific Characteristics of Patent Applications in France, Germany and the UK in the Biotechnology Sectors , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[44]  HOW ECONOMICS BECAME A MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE , 2003 .

[45]  A. Tupasela National Innovation System - Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric , 2003 .

[46]  Francisco J. Arcelus,et al.  On the efficiency of national innovation systems , 2003 .

[47]  J. Fagerberg Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature , 2003 .

[48]  C. Freeman Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness , 2004 .

[49]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[50]  J. Hisnanick,et al.  Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science , 2004 .

[51]  Markus Balzat,et al.  Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems , 2004 .

[52]  Jae-Yong Choung,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Institutional Linkages and Performances in the Case of Korea and Taiwan , 2000, Scientometrics.

[53]  B. Lundvall Introduction to ‘Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness’ by Christopher Freeman , 2004 .

[54]  Sandro Mendonça,et al.  Towards a taxonomy of innovation systems , 2005 .

[55]  Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque,et al.  Inadequacy of technology and innovation systems at the periphery: notes on Celso Furtado's contributions for a dialogue between evolutionists and structuralists , 2005 .

[56]  Patrick Eparvier Methods of evolutionism and rivalry with neoclassical analysis. The example of the National System of Innovation concept , 2005 .

[57]  John Groenewegen,et al.  The Evolution of National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[58]  Naubahar Sharif,et al.  Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept , 2006 .

[59]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[60]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains , 2006, Scientometrics.

[61]  B. Lundvall Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool , 2022 .

[62]  P. McCann Observational Equivalence? Regional Studies and Regional Science , 2007 .

[63]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development , 2008 .

[64]  K. Asakawa,et al.  Internationalization of R&D in China and India: Conventional wisdom versus reality , 2008 .

[65]  Mu Rongping,et al.  The development of science and technology in China: A comparison with India and the United States , 2008 .

[66]  A. Teixeira,et al.  Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account , 2008 .

[67]  Sandra T. Silva,et al.  On the divergence of evolutionary research paths in the past 50 years: a comprehensive bibliometric account , 2009 .

[68]  Exploring the impact of national system of innovation on the outcomes of foreign direct investment. , 2009 .

[69]  Stanislav Zaichenko,et al.  Towards a new role of universities in Russia: prospects and limitations , 2009 .

[70]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[71]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field , 2009 .

[72]  Benoît Godin,et al.  National Innovation System , 2009 .

[73]  David C. Mowery,et al.  The evolution of Norway’s national innovation system , 2009 .

[74]  Sandra T. Silva,et al.  On evolutionary technological change and economic growth: Lakatos as a starting point for appraisal , 2009 .

[75]  Jo Lorentzen Learning by firms: the black box of South Africa's innovation system , 2009 .

[76]  Arnaud X. Varé,et al.  Third-party Provision of Conversion Technologies in Network Markets , 2009 .

[77]  W. Yoon,et al.  How Relevant and Useful is the Concept of National Systems of Innovation , 2009 .

[78]  I. Álvarez,et al.  Entry modes and national systems of innovation , 2010 .

[79]  Fengchao Liu,et al.  A regional perspective on the structural transformation of China's national innovation system since 1999 , 2010 .

[80]  Boo-Young Eom,et al.  Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization☆ , 2010 .

[81]  S. Cruz,et al.  The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies–Regional Science Debate , 2010 .

[82]  M. Wright,et al.  30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[83]  M. Dodgson,et al.  Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia , 2011 .

[84]  In memory of Chris Freeman: Founding Editor of Research Policy, 1971–2003 , 2011 .

[85]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  National innovation systems : The emergence of a new approach , 2011 .

[86]  Nadine Roijakkers,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Open Innovation on National Systems of Innovation – A Theoretical Analysis , 2011 .

[87]  Aurora A. C. Teixeira,et al.  Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship , 2011, Scientometrics.

[88]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Christopher Freeman: Social Science Entrepreneur , 2011 .

[89]  Hannes Toivanen,et al.  African regional innovation systems: bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[90]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The harnessing of biotechnology in India: Which roads to travel? , 2012 .

[91]  S. Ramani,et al.  Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework , 2012 .

[92]  A. Teixeira,et al.  A bibliometric account of Chinese economics research through the lens of the China Economic Review , 2012 .

[93]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems , 2012 .

[94]  P. Georgiadis,et al.  The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis , 2012 .

[95]  Christopher Williams,et al.  Political instability, pro-business market reforms and their impacts on national systems of innovation , 2012 .