IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF USER REQUIREMENTS TO SUPPORT ROBUST CORRIDOR INVESTMENT MODELS

The purpose of the project was to develop useable techniques to integrate a broader range of potential impacts of transportation investments into transportation planning and decision-making. The research project described in this report developed a multi-attribute framework that can be used to assist in organizing and synthesizing information to measure costs and benefits, both monetary and non-monetary, of highway corridor investments. A modular approach was taken to developing individual techniques to quantify the potential impacts that could be utilized within the framework. The framework is flexible enough to accommodate the incorporation of additional techniques over time. To determine the range of potential impacts to consider, the values and needs of various stakeholders in highway corridors were taken into account and incorporated into variables, or indicators, to be used in a comprehensive system for evaluating impacts, costs, and benefits. Example techniques include a consideration and demonstration of the utility of geographic information systems (GIS) to organize data for use with the hedonic land valuation method. A prediction map was generated from this process, indicating the price consumers are willing to pay for a house in relation to its location with respect to highway corridors. This information is useful in analyzing the impact of competing corridor alternatives. In order to measure other indicators, the project also assessed the utility of high-resolution satellite remote sensing (RS) image data to provide highly accurate inputs necessary for economic models and as a means of measuring success after investments have been made. A methodology was developed to identify commercial and industrial origins and destinations from impervious surfaces. This, in turn, was translated into a calculation of average travel distances that could be used to quantify accessibility impacts associated with corridor alternatives. Remote sensing and GIS were assessed because of the spatial nature of transportation investments and their potential as a measuring tool for the transportation indicators. This multi-attribute framework is consistent with the Missouri Department of Transportation's (MoDOT's) overall planning direction of including the perspectives of more individuals/groups and potential impacts in decision making. This overall planning direction is seen in the Planning Framework and the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).

[1]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[2]  R. A. Schonengertt Techniques for Image Processing and Classification in Remote Sensing , 1983 .

[3]  Frank Southworth,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT AND VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY DUE TO INCIDENTS ON FREEWAYS , 1999 .

[4]  Raymond B. Palmquist Estimating the Demand for the Characteristics of Housing , 1984 .

[5]  Thomas G. Johnson,et al.  Local Preferences for Economic Development Outcomes: Analytical Hierarchy Procedure , 2000 .

[6]  R. K. Shyamasundar,et al.  Introduction to algorithms , 1996 .

[7]  H. V. Gelder The Netherlands , 2004, Constitutions of Europe (2 vols.).

[8]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies , 1992 .

[9]  Clifford Stein,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edition. , 2001 .

[10]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[11]  Sudip Chattopadhyay Estimating the Demand for Air Quality: New Evidence Based on the Chicago Housing Market , 1999 .

[12]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[13]  Daniel Rodríguez,et al.  Adobe Photoshop 7 , 2002 .

[14]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Benefits Transfer in a Random Utility Model of Recreation , 1994 .

[15]  R. M. Beemiller,et al.  Regional multipliers: A user handbook for the regional input-output modeling system (RIMS II). Second edition , 1992 .

[16]  K. G. Willis,et al.  Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives , 1995 .

[17]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[18]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer , 1992 .

[19]  Aris Spanos,et al.  Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling , 1986 .

[20]  Indrani Basak,et al.  When to combine group judgments and when not to in the analytic hierarchy process: A new method , 1988 .

[21]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  A mathematical treatment of inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process , 1993 .

[22]  W. E. Upjohn Understanding the Impact of Transportation on Economic Development , 1999 .