Application of Life Cycle Design to Aluminum Intake Manifolds

Life cycle design (LCD) is a framework for designing product systems which are both economically and ecologically sustainable. Key elements of this framework are systems analysis, multicriteria analysis and multistakeholder participation. This paper illustrates the application of life cycle design for a comparative evaluation of a prototype sand-cast 2.0 1 aluminum manifold for the 1995 Ford Contour and a 2.0 1 equivalent of the 1.9 1 multi-tube brazed aluminum manifold for the 1995 Ford Escort. A life cycle inventory analysis was performed for the intake manifolds by evaluating the energy and wastes in the raw material acquisition, material processing, manufacturing, use and retirement stages. The environmental data for the two manifolds were integrated with life cycle cost and performance data to enhance product design and decision making. The stakeholders for this study consisted of different levels of suppliers (tier 1, tier 2, tier 3, etc.), Ford, users, dismantlers, shredders, non-ferrous processors, scrap metal dealers, waste managers, and regulators. The interaction of these diverse stakeholders and their individual needs defined the design requirements of the manifold system. These requirements were identified and evaluated by a crossfunctional team from Ford including powertrain product, manufacturing and environmental engineering, materials research, energy analysis, environmental quality, casting operations, advanced vehicle technology and their vehicle recycling program. The results of the analysis show that the life cycle energy, most air emissions and waterborne waste are lower for the multi-tube brazed manifold. Life cycle solid wastes are lower for the sand-cast manifold. Life cycle cost of the two manifolds are almost identical.

[1]  M. V. DiBernardo Delphi VIII: forecast and analysis of the North American automotive industry. Volume 3: materials , 1996 .

[2]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle design framework and demonstration projects. Profiles of at and T and AlliedSignal , 1995 .

[4]  Mary Anne Wheeler Lightweight Materials and Life Cycle Energy Use , 1982 .

[5]  J. Cummings-Saxton Energy Tradeoffs in Automotive Use of Steel, Fiber-Reinforced Plastics and Aluminum , 1982 .

[6]  Jochen Harnisch,et al.  Estimation of tropospheric trends (1980 - 1995) for CF4 and C2F6 from stratospheric data , 1995, Other Conferences.

[7]  S. R. S. Kalpakjian Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials , 1984 .

[8]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment , 1992 .

[9]  J. A. Charles Interaction of design, manufacturing method, and material selection , 1989 .

[10]  Philip G. Gott,et al.  Life Cycle Energy. Requirements for Selected Automotive Sheet Materials , 1982 .

[11]  William J. Farrissey RIM Parts for Automobiles - Life Cycle Energy and Ecobalance , 1991 .

[12]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life Cycle Design Criteria for Engine Oil Filters: AlliedSignal Case Study , 1995 .

[13]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Analysis for Automobiles , 1995 .

[14]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  The application of life cycle assessment to design , 1993 .

[15]  Steven B. Young,et al.  Applying environmental life-cycle analysis to materials , 1994 .

[16]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials selection in conceptual design , 1989 .

[17]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle design framework and demonstration projects , 1995 .

[18]  Scot A. Arnold,et al.  Techno-economic issues in the selection of auto materials , 1993 .

[19]  Tomas Rydberg Improved Environmental Performance of Products: Halocarbon Substitution, Packaging Development and Life Cycle Assessment , 1994 .

[20]  James A. Fava,et al.  A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment , 1994 .

[21]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Sustainable Development by Design: Review of Life Cycle Design and Related Approaches , 1994 .

[22]  C. Brühl,et al.  Infrared band intensities and global warming potentials of CF4, C2F6, C3F8, C4F10, C5F12, and C6F14 , 1995 .