Do ambiguous reconstructions always give ambiguous images?

In many cases self-calibration is not able to yield a unique solution for the 3D reconstruction of a scene. This is due to the occurrence of critical motion sequences. If this is the case, an ambiguity is left on the reconstruction. In this paper we derive under which conditions correct novel views can be generated from ambiguous reconstructions. The problem is first approached from a theoretical point of view: It is proven that novel views are correct as long as the inclusion of the next view the sequence yields the same ambiguity on the reconstruction. The problem is therefore much related to the problem of critical motion sequences since the virtual camera can be arbitrarily moved within the smallest critical motion set that the recovered camera motion without distortions becoming visible. Based on these results a practical measure for the expected ambiguity on a novel view generated from the recovered structure and motion is derived. As an application a viewer was built that indicates if a specific novel view can be trusted or not by altering the background color.

[1]  M. Pollefeys.  Self-calibration and metric 3d reconstruction from uncalibrated image sequences , 1999 .

[2]  Peter F. Sturm,et al.  Critical motion sequences for the self-calibration of cameras and stereo systems with variable focal length , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  Ian D. Reid,et al.  Camera calibration and the search for infinity , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Theory of Reconstruction from Image Motion , 1992 .

[5]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Resolving ambiguities in auto–calibration , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Anders Heyden,et al.  Minimal Conditions on Intrinsic Parameters for Euclidean Reconstruction , 1998, ACCV.

[7]  Peter F. Sturm,et al.  Critical motion sequences for monocular self-calibration and uncalibrated Euclidean reconstruction , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[9]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Autocalibration and the absolute quadric , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Rajiv Gupta,et al.  Stereo from uncalibrated cameras , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Anders Heyden,et al.  Euclidean reconstruction from image sequences with varying and unknown focal length and principal point , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  Euclidean Reconstruction from Uncalibrated Views , 1993, Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision.

[13]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Reinhard Koch,et al.  Self-Calibration and Metric Reconstruction Inspite of Varying and Unknown Intrinsic Camera Parameters , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[15]  Peter Sturm.  Critical Motion Sequences and Conjugacy of Ambiguous Euclidean Reconstructions , 1997 .

[16]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig , 1992, ECCV.

[17]  O. D. Faugeras,et al.  Camera Self-Calibration: Theory and Experiments , 1992, ECCV.

[18]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Stratified Self-Calibration with the Modulus Constraint , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..