Path perception during rotation: influence of instructions, depth range, and dot density

How do observers perceive their direction of self-motion when traveling on a straight path while their eyes are rotating? Our previous findings suggest that information from retinal flow and extra-retinal information about eye movements are each sufficient to solve this problem for both perception and active control of self-motion [Vision Res. 40 (2000) 3873; Psych. Sci. 13 (2002) 485]. In this paper, using displays depicting translation with simulated eye rotation, we investigated how task variables such as instructions, depth range, and dot density influenced the visual system's reliance on retinal vs. extra-retinal information for path perception during rotation. We found that path errors were small when observers expected to travel on a straight path or with neutral instructions, but errors increased markedly when observers expected to travel on a curved path. Increasing depth range or dot density did not improve path judgments. We conclude that the expectation of the shape of an upcoming path can influence the interpretation of the ambiguous retinal flow. A large depth range and dense motion parallax are not essential for accurate path perception during rotation, but reference objects and a large field of view appear to improve path judgments.

[1]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Estimating heading during eye movements , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis , 1974, Perception.

[3]  J. Perrone,et al.  Human Heading Estimation During Visually Simulated Curvilinear Motion , 1997, Vision Research.

[4]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[5]  A. V. van den Berg.  Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow. , 1992, Vision research.

[6]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[7]  Li Li,et al.  Perception of heading during rotation: sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Where we Go With a Little Good Information , 1999 .

[9]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[10]  J E Cutting,et al.  Heading and path information from retinal flow in naturalistic environments , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[12]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Two Eyes Are Better Than One , 1996 .

[14]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Facts on optic flow , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  J A Perrone,et al.  Model for the computation of self-motion in biological systems. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[18]  A. V. D. Berg,et al.  Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  J H Rieger,et al.  Processing differential image motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  R K Jones,et al.  Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[22]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  W. Warren,et al.  Retinal Flow Is Sufficient for Steering During Observer Rotation , 2002, Psychological science.

[24]  James A. Crowell,et al.  The perception of heading during eye movements , 1992, Nature.

[25]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Richard A Andersen,et al.  Pursuit Compensation during Self-Motion , 2001, Perception.

[27]  E. Peli,et al.  Heading Perception in Patients with Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  On the sufficiency of the velocity field for perception of heading , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading , 1994, Nature.

[30]  M Lappe,et al.  Dynamical use of different sources of information in heading judgments from retinal flow. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading , 1994, Vision Research.

[32]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Analysis of misperceived observer motion during simulated eye rotations , 1994, Vision Research.