Probabilistic gas quantification with MOX sensors in Open Sampling Systems—A Gaussian Process approach

Gas quantification based on the response of an array of metal oxide (MOX) gas sensors in an Open Sampling System is a complex problem due to the highly dynamic characteristic of turbulent airflow and the slow dynamics of the MOX sensors. However, many gas related applications require to determine the gas concentration the sensors are being exposed to. Due to the chaotic nature that dominates gas dispersal, in most cases it is desirable to provide, together with an estimate of the mean concentration, an estimate of the uncertainty of the prediction. This work presents a probabilistic approach for gas quantification with an array of MOX gas sensors based on Gaussian Processes, estimating for every measurement of the sensors a posterior distribution of the concentration, from which confidence intervals can be obtained. The proposed approach has been tested with an experimental setup where an array of MOX sensors and a Photo Ionization Detector (PID), used to obtain ground truth concentration, are placed downwind with respect to the gas source. Our approach has been implemented and compared with standard gas quantification methods, demonstrating the advantages when estimating gas concentrations.

[1]  D. L. Baldwin,et al.  Development and calibration of field-effect transistor-based sensor array for measurement of hydrogen and ammonia gas mixtures in humid air. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  K. Ihokura,et al.  The Stannic Oxide Gas SensorPrinciples and Applications , 1994 .

[3]  Javier Gonzalez Monroy,et al.  The Multi-Chamber Electronic Nose—An Improved Olfaction Sensor for Mobile Robotics , 2011, Sensors.

[4]  Paul Geladi,et al.  A comparison of modeling nonlinear systems with artificial neural networks and partial least squares , 1999 .

[5]  R. Andrew Russell,et al.  Odour Detection by Mobile Robots , 1999, World Scientific Series in Robotics and Intelligent Systems.

[6]  A. Shmilovici,et al.  Finding the best calibration points for a gas sensor array with support vector regression , 2004, 2004 2nd International IEEE Conference on 'Intelligent Systems'. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04EX791).

[7]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[8]  Robert P. Cogdill,et al.  Least-Squares Support Vector Machines for Chemometrics: An Introduction and Evaluation , 2004 .

[9]  R. Andrew Russell,et al.  Robot Odor Localization: A Taxonomy and Survey , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  Towards environmental monitoring with mobile robots , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  H. Ishida,et al.  Plume-Tracking Robots: A New Application of Chemical Sensors , 2001, The Biological Bulletin.

[12]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  Airborne Chemical Sensing with Mobile Robots , 2006, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[13]  H. Troy Nagle,et al.  Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose Technology , 2003 .

[14]  Paul J. Gemperline,et al.  Nonlinear multivariate calibration using principal components regression and artificial neural networks , 1991 .

[15]  J. Blanco,et al.  Calibration of MOX gas sensors in open sampling systems based on Gaussian Processes , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[16]  A. Lilienthal,et al.  Creating true gas concentration maps in presence of multiple heterogeneous gas sources , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[17]  Ingemar Lundström,et al.  Artificial neural networks and gas sensor arrays: quantification of individual components in a gas mixture , 1991 .

[18]  Javier Gonzalez Monroy,et al.  A Kalman filter based approach to probabilistic gas distribution mapping , 2013, SAC '13.

[19]  Sahar Asadi,et al.  Autonomous Gas-Sensitive Microdrone: Wind Vector Estimation and Gas Distribution Mapping , 2012, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks , 1995 .

[21]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  Online classification of gases for environmental exploration , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Jordi Coello,et al.  Calibration in non-linear near infrared reflectance spectroscopy: a comparison of several methods , 1999 .

[23]  Achim J. Lilienthal,et al.  A statistical approach to gas distribution modelling with mobile robots - The Kernel DM+V algorithm , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  C. Natale,et al.  Sensor-array calibration time reduction by dynamic modelling , 1995 .

[25]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Backpropagation Networks , 1996 .

[26]  Marco Trincavelli,et al.  Gas Discrimination for Mobile Robots , 2011, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[27]  Tom Duckett,et al.  A stereo electronic nose for a mobile inspection robot , 2003, 1st International Workshop on Robotic Sensing, 2003. ROSE' 03..

[28]  Paolo Dario,et al.  The DustBot System: Using Mobile Robots to Monitor Pollution in Pedestrian Area , 2010 .

[29]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning) , 2005 .

[30]  E. Massera,et al.  On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an urban pollution monitoring scenario , 2008 .

[31]  T. Moriizumi,et al.  Remote sensing of gas/odor source location and concentration distribution using mobile system , 1998 .

[32]  Takamichi Nakamoto,et al.  Movie with Scents Generated by Olfactory Display Using Solenoid Valves , 2006, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..