Retrospective checking of compliance with practice guidelines for acute stroke care: a novel experiment using openEHR’s Guideline Definition Language

BackgroundProviding scalable clinical decision support (CDS) across institutions that use different electronic health record (EHR) systems has been a challenge for medical informatics researchers. The lack of commonly shared EHR models and terminology bindings has been recognised as a major barrier to sharing CDS content among different organisations. The openEHR Guideline Definition Language (GDL) expresses CDS content based on openEHR archetypes and can support any clinical terminologies or natural languages. Our aim was to explore in an experimental setting the practicability of GDL and its underlying archetype formalism. A further aim was to report on the artefacts produced by this new technological approach in this particular experiment. We modelled and automatically executed compliance checking rules from clinical practice guidelines for acute stroke care.MethodsWe extracted rules from the European clinical practice guidelines as well as from treatment contraindications for acute stroke care and represented them using GDL. Then we executed the rules retrospectively on 49 mock patient cases to check the cases’ compliance with the guidelines, and manually validated the execution results. We used openEHR archetypes, GDL rules, the openEHR reference information model, reference terminologies and the Data Archetype Definition Language. We utilised the open-sourced GDL Editor for authoring GDL rules, the international archetype repository for reusing archetypes, the open-sourced Ocean Archetype Editor for authoring or modifying archetypes and the CDS Workbench for executing GDL rules on patient data.ResultsWe successfully represented clinical rules about 14 out of 19 contraindications for thrombolysis and other aspects of acute stroke care with 80 GDL rules. These rules are based on 14 reused international archetypes (one of which was modified), 2 newly created archetypes and 51 terminology bindings (to three terminologies). Our manual compliance checks for 49 mock patients were a complete match versus the automated compliance results.ConclusionsShareable guideline knowledge for use in automated retrospective checking of guideline compliance may be achievable using GDL. Whether the same GDL rules can be used for at-the-point-of-care CDS remains unknown.

[1]  Antonio Moreno,et al.  Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: A review , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  A. Hasman,et al.  From Clinical Practice Guidelines to Computer-interpretable Guidelines , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[3]  Mark Parsons,et al.  Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4·5 h after an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  Anneke T. M. Goossen-Baremans,et al.  Detailed Clinical Models: A Review , 2010, Healthcare informatics research.

[5]  Baoyao Zhou,et al.  An OCL-compliant GELLO Engine , 2011, MIE.

[6]  Silvana Quaglini,et al.  Guideline-based careflow systems , 2000, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  Bradford H Gray,et al.  Electronic health records: an international perspective on "meaningful use". , 2011, Issue brief.

[8]  Elsa Azevedo,et al.  Intravenous Alteplase for Stroke in Those Older Than 80 Years Old , 2010, Stroke.

[9]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  James Kardach.  !"#$%&&%' Architecture Overview , 2000 .

[11]  Vassilis Koutkias,et al.  Towards a standardised representation of a knowledge base for adverse drug event prevention. , 2011, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[12]  Diego Martínez Hernández,et al.  Semantic similarity-based alignment between clinical archetypes and SNOMED CT: An application to observations , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Jing Mei,et al.  An engine for compliance checking of clinical guidelines. , 2012, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[14]  D M Reker,et al.  Stroke Care: A Method for Measuring Compliance with AHCPR Guidelines , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  Yaron Denekamp,et al.  Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: Knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM) , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  Mar Marcos,et al.  Towards the Interoperability of Computerised Guidelines and Electronic Health Records: An Experiment with openEHR Archetypes and a Chronic Heart Failure Guideline , 2010, KR4HC.

[17]  Miguel-Ángel Sicilia,et al.  Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  T Beale.  Archetype Definition Language (ADL) , 2004 .

[19]  Nadim Anani,et al.  OpenEHR-based representation of guideline compliance data through the example of stroke clinical practice guidelines. , 2012, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[20]  Mor Peleg,et al.  Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: A methodological review , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[21]  John Fox,et al.  Application of Information Technology: The Syntax and Semantics of the PROforma Guideline Modeling Language , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  Y Shahar,et al.  An intention-based language for representing clinical guidelines. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[23]  Diego Boscá,et al.  Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: A case study in clinical trial eligibility , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[25]  Aziz A. Boxwala,et al.  Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: : A literature review of guideline representation models , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead , 2006 .

[27]  James R. Campbell,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: The SAGE Guideline Model: Achievements and Overview , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[28]  Mark Michelman,et al.  Cooperative Efforts Improve Compliance with Acute Stroke Guidelines , 2003, Southern medical journal.

[29]  Silvana Quaglini,et al.  Improving Compliance to Guidelines through Workflow Technology: Implementation and Results in a Stroke Unit , 2007, MedInfo.

[30]  Marion F Walker,et al.  Evidence-based stroke r-ehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the european stroke organisation (ESO) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[31]  MarcosMar,et al.  Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes , 2013 .

[32]  I. Kohane,et al.  Escaping the EHR trap--the future of health IT. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Erik Sundvall,et al.  Integration of tools for binding archetypes to SNOMED CT , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[34]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  Description and Status Update on GELLO: a Proposed Standardized Object-Oriented Expression Language for Clinical Decision Support , 2004, MedInfo.

[35]  Tonya Hongsermeier,et al.  A study of diverse clinical decision support rule authoring environments and requirements for integration , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[36]  Rong Chen,et al.  Representing a Chemotherapy Guideline Using openEHR and Rules , 2009, MIE.

[37]  Karen Grimmer-Somers,et al.  Factors influencing acute stroke guideline compliance: a peek inside the 'black box' for allied health staff. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.