Clinical and Biomarker Evaluations of Sunitinib in Patients with Grade 3 Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Background/Aims: Angiogenesis is extensively developed in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET) where sunitinib was shown to prolong progression-free survival, leading to nationwide approval. However, clinical experience in patients with grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNEN-G3) remains limited. This prospective phase II trial evaluated potential predictive biomarkers of sunitinib activity in patients with advanced GEPNEN-G3. Methods: Sunitinib was given at a dose of 37.5 mg/day as a continuous daily dosing until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Evaluation of activity was based on RECIST1.1. Safety was evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v4. Pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its main active metabolite SU12662 were evaluated. All tumour samples were reviewed histologically for tumour differentiation. PDGFRβ, carbonic anhydrase 9, Ki-67, VEGFR2, and p-AKT were quantified using immunohistochemistry and their expression correlated with response by RECIST1.1. Results: Thirty-one patients were included and 26 had available histological tissue. Six and 20 patients presented well-differentiated tumours (NET-G3) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), respectively. Eighteen patients responded to sunitinib (4 experienced partial responses and 14 tumour stabilization). A high p-AKT expression correlated with lower response to sunitinib (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.99, p = 0.04). Safety and PK exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 in these patients were consistent with that reported in PanNET. Conclusion: Sunitinib showed evidence of activity in patients with GEPNEN-G3 with expected toxicity profile. In the NET-G3 and NEC groups, 4/6 and 11/20 patients were responders, respectively. High p-AKT expression predicted a lower response to sunitinib. Our study allowed the identification of a potential biomarker of resistance/sensitivity to sunitinib in aggressive GEPNEN-G3.

[1]  R. Lloyd,et al.  WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs , 2017 .

[2]  L. Antonuzzo,et al.  Everolimus in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas G3 , 2017, Pancreas.

[3]  N. Fazio,et al.  Heterogeneity of grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: New insights and treatment implications. , 2016, Cancer treatment reviews.

[4]  M. Falconi,et al.  mTOR inhibitors response and mTOR pathway in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. , 2016, Endocrine-related cancer.

[5]  P. Ruszniewski,et al.  Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement. , 2016, The oncologist.

[6]  P. Hammel,et al.  [Therapeutic management of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine lung tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the digestive system]. , 2016, Bulletin du cancer.

[7]  J. Baselga,et al.  Therapeutic Benefit of Selective Inhibition of p110α PI3-Kinase in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  H. Sorbye,et al.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas , 2016, Neuroendocrinology.

[9]  P. Hammel,et al.  [Therapeutic management of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine lung tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the digestive system]. , 2016, Bulletin du cancer.

[10]  C. Chougnet,et al.  Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. , 2015, Endocrine-related cancer.

[11]  A. Krasinskas,et al.  The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  K. Hess,et al.  Perfusion Computed Tomography as Functional Biomarker in Randomized Run-In Study of Bevacizumab and Everolimus in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2015, Pancreas.

[13]  Houjie Liang Diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms , 2014 .

[14]  H. Sorbye,et al.  Nordic guidelines 2014 for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms , 2014, Acta oncologica.

[15]  L. Goodnough,et al.  In reply , 2014, Transfusion.

[16]  D. Planchard,et al.  Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? , 2013, Endocrine-related cancer.

[17]  Xihong Lin,et al.  Prognostic significance of MTOR pathway component expression in neuroendocrine tumors. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  M. V. van Velthuysen,et al.  Incidence and survival of neuroendocrine tumours in the Netherlands according to histological grade: experience of two decades of cancer registry. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[19]  R. Pazdur,et al.  FDA approval summary: sunitinib for the treatment of progressive well-differentiated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. , 2012, The Oncologist.

[20]  E. Raymond,et al.  Sunitinib in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors , 2012, Targeted Oncology.

[21]  G. Mills,et al.  PIK3CA/PTEN Mutations and Akt Activation As Markers of Sensitivity to Allosteric mTOR Inhibitors , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  H. Korashy,et al.  Sunitinib malate. , 2012, Profiles of drug substances, excipients, and related methodology.

[23]  Y. Bang,et al.  Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. Coppola,et al.  Activation of the serine/theronine protein kinase Akt in enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. , 2010, Anticancer research.

[25]  E. Solcia,et al.  Pathology of gastrointestinal disorders. , 2010, Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America.

[26]  Manal M. Hassan,et al.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  E. Raymond,et al.  Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Haesun Choi Critical issues in response evaluation on computed tomography: Lessons from the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model , 2005, Current oncology reports.