Indicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space

Abstract Sign languages have traditionally been described as having a distinction between (1) arbitrary (referential or syntactic) space, considered to be a purely grammatical use of space in which locations arbitrarily represent concrete or abstract subject and/or object arguments using pronouns or indicating verbs, for example, and (2) motivated (topographic or surrogate) space, involving mapping of locations of concrete referents onto the signing space via classifier constructions. Some linguists have suggested that it may be misleading to see the two uses of space as being completely distinct from one another. In this study, we use conversational data from the British Sign Language Corpus (www.bslcorpusproject.org) to look at the use of space with modified indicating verbs – specifically the directions in which these verbs are used as well as the co-occurrence of eyegaze shifts and constructed action. Our findings suggest that indicating verbs are frequently produced in conditions that use space in a motivated way and are rarely modified using arbitrary space. This contrasts with previous claims that indicating verbs in BSL prototypically use arbitrary space. We discuss the implications of this for theories about grammaticalisation and the role of gesture in sign languages and for sign language teaching.

[1]  Benjamin Bahan,et al.  Non-manual realization of agreement in American sign language , 1996 .

[2]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  From archive to corpus: transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora , 2008, PACLIC.

[3]  Asli Özyürek,et al.  Visible Cohesion: A Comparison of Reference Tracking in Sign, Speech, and Co-Speech Gesture , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Viveka Velupillai,et al.  An Introduction to Linguistic Typology , 2012 .

[5]  Kearsy Cormier,et al.  In or Out?: Spatial Scale and Enactment in Narratives of Native and Nonnative Signing Deaf Children Acquiring British Sign Language , 2014 .

[6]  David Alan Stewart,et al.  American Sign Language the easy way , 2003 .

[7]  Ann Kathleen Farmer,et al.  On the interaction of morphology and syntax , 1980 .

[8]  Sarah Florence Taub,et al.  Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language , 2001 .

[9]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[10]  D. Tannen.  Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse , 1989 .

[11]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Differential Processing of Topographic and Referential Functions of Space , 2013 .

[12]  Jana Hosemann,et al.  Eye gaze and verb agreement in German Sign Language: A first glance , 2013 .

[13]  Robin L. Thompson.  Eye gaze in American Sign Language: Linguistic functions for verbs and pronouns , 2006 .

[14]  Richard P. Meier,et al.  The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages , 2002 .

[15]  Josep Quer,et al.  Reporting and Quoting in Signed Discourse , 2010 .

[16]  Pamela M. Perniss,et al.  Use of sign space , 2021, The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research.

[17]  Terry Janzen.  Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL , 2004 .

[18]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Gaze and Verb Agreement in American Sign Language: An Eye-tracking Study , 2006 .

[19]  William C. Stokoe.  Space in Danish Sign Language by Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (review) , 1994 .

[20]  Susan Lioyd McBurney,et al.  Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages: Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? , 2002 .

[21]  D. Lillo-Martin.  The Point of View Predicate in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[22]  K. Cormier,et al.  Rethinking constructed action , 2015 .

[23]  Josep Quer,et al.  Context Shift and Indexical Variables in Sign Languages , 2005 .

[24]  Anja Stukenbrock,et al.  Pointing to an ‘empty’ space: Deixis am Phantasma in face-to-face interaction , 2014 .

[25]  Rachel Sutton-Spence,et al.  ECHO data set for British Sign Language (BSL) , 2004 .

[26]  C. Padden.  Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language , 2016 .

[27]  S. Kita.  Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet , 2003 .

[28]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  Auslan Corpus Annotation Guidelines , 2013 .

[29]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Learning to look: The acquisition of eye gaze agreement during the production of ASL verbs* , 2009, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[30]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Sign Language and Linguistic Universals: Entering the lexicon: lexicalization, backformation, and cross-modal borrowing , 2006 .

[31]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  The role of gesture in directional verbs in British Sign Language: A corpus-based study , 2014 .

[32]  Scott K. Liddell.  Agreement disagreements , 2011 .

[33]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[34]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  The use of space with indicating verbs in Australian Sign Language: A corpus-based investigation , 2009 .

[35]  Kearsy Cormier,et al.  Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives , 2013 .

[36]  Debbie B. Golos,et al.  Use and Functions of Spatial Planes in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) Discourse , 2014 .

[37]  K. Aaron Smith,et al.  Grammaticalization , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[38]  G. Mathur,et al.  7. Verb agreement , 2012 .

[39]  J. Sidnell.  Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments , 2006 .

[40]  Ruth Carolyn Loew.  Roles and reference in American sign language : a developmental perspective , 1984 .

[41]  Melanie Metzger,et al.  Gesture in sign language discourse , 1998 .

[42]  Karen van Hoek,et al.  Conceptual Spaces and Pronominal Reference in American Sign Language , 1992, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[43]  U. Bellugi,et al.  What the hands reveal about the brain , 1987 .

[44]  Rachel Sutton-Spence,et al.  The Linguistics of British Sign Language: Linguistics and sign linguistics , 1999 .

[45]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  That's Not What I Meant!: How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others , 1992 .

[46]  Dorothy Miles.  British Sign Language: A Beginner's Guide , 1988 .

[47]  Kearsy Cormier,et al.  Locus agreement in American Sign Language , 1999 .

[48]  Scott K. Liddell.  Language and Gesture: Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse , 2000 .

[49]  Gary Morgan,et al.  The influence of typology and modality on the acquisition of language , 2006 .

[50]  Diane Lillo-Martin,et al.  On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages , 2011, Theoretical linguistics.

[51]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Arbitrary and topographic space in sign language development , 1994 .

[52]  Irit Meir,et al.  Sign Languages: The grammar of space in two new sign languages , 2010 .

[53]  Scott K. Liddell.  Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language , 2003 .