Effects of size on the strength and deformation mechanism in Zr-based metallic glasses

We report results of uniaxial compression tests on Zr_(35)Ti_(30)Co_(6)Be_(29) metallic glass nano-pillars with diameters ranging from ~1.6 μm to ~100 nm. The tested pillars have nearly vertical sidewalls, with the tapering angle lower than ~1° (diameter >200 nm) or ~2° (diameter ~100 nm), and with a flat pillar top to minimize the artifacts due to imperfect geometry. We report that highly-localized-to-homogeneous deformation mode change occurs at 100 nm diameter, without any change in the yield strength. We also find that yield strength depends on size only down to 800 nm, below which it remains at its maximum value of 2.6 GPa. Quantitative Weibull analysis suggests that the increase in strength cannot be solely attributed to the lower probability of having weak flaws in small samples – most likely there is an additional influence of the sample size on the plastic deformation mechanism.

[1]  C. Volkert,et al.  Effect of sample size on deformation in amorphous metals , 2008 .

[2]  Christopher A. Schuh,et al.  Strength, plasticity and brittleness of bulk metallic glasses under compression: statistical and geometric effects , 2008 .

[3]  Douglas C. Hofmann,et al.  Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility , 2008, Nature.

[4]  C. Motz,et al.  Micro-compression testing: A critical discussion of experimental constraints , 2009 .

[5]  E. Arzt.  Size effects in materials due to microstructural and dimensional constraints: a comparative review , 1998 .

[6]  Jian Xu,et al.  Reliability of compressive fracture strength of Mg–Zn–Ca bulk metallic glasses: Flaw sensitivity and Weibull statistics , 2008 .

[7]  W. Wang,et al.  Prevalence of shear banding in compression of Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 pillars as small as 150 nm in diameter , 2009 .

[8]  P. Uggowitzer,et al.  Tensile properties of glassy MgZnCa wires and reliability analysis using Weibull statistics , 2009 .

[9]  Nanoscale Weibull statistics , 2005, cond-mat/0504518.

[10]  Yat Li,et al.  Effect of crystallinity on the impact toughness of a La-based bulk metallic glass , 2000 .

[11]  A. Minor,et al.  Plastic flow and failure resistance of metallic glass: Insight from in situ compression of nanopillars , 2008 .

[12]  W. Weibull.  A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[13]  M. Ashby,et al.  Metallic glasses as structural materials , 2006 .

[14]  T. Hufnagel,et al.  Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys , 2007 .

[15]  P. Yan,et al.  Tensile ductility and necking of metallic glass. , 2007, Nature materials.

[16]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Light emission during fracture of a Zr–Ti–Ni–Cu–Be bulk metallic glass , 1999 .

[17]  Y. Pei,et al.  Effects of size on the mechanical response of metallic glasses investigated through in situ TEM bending and compression experiments , 2010 .

[18]  P. Uggowitzer,et al.  MgZnCa glasses without clinically observable hydrogen evolution for biodegradable implants. , 2009, Nature materials.

[19]  T. Nieh,et al.  New regime of homogeneous flow in the deformation map of metallic glasses: elevated temperature nanoindentation experiments and mechanistic modeling , 2004 .

[20]  Lei Lu,et al.  High tensile strength reliability in a bulk metallic glass , 2008 .

[21]  Julia R. Greer,et al.  Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients , 2005 .

[22]  Julia R Greer,et al.  Transition from a strong-yet-brittle to a stronger-and-ductile state by size reduction of metallic glasses. , 2010, Nature materials.

[23]  J. C. Huang,et al.  Bulk and microscale compressive behavior of a Zr-based metallic glass , 2008 .

[24]  A. Argon.  Plastic deformation in metallic glasses , 1979 .

[25]  Michael D. Uchic,et al.  A combined experimental and simulation study to examine lateral constraint effects on microcompression of single-slip oriented single crystals , 2009 .

[26]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  The Design of Accurate Micro-Compression Experiments , 2006 .

[27]  Mo Li,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of intrinsic and extrinsic mechanical properties of amorphous metals , 2006 .

[28]  Ju Li,et al.  Yield point of metallic glass , 2006 .

[29]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Bulk and microscale compressive properties of a Pd-based metallic glass , 2007 .

[30]  W. Wang,et al.  Fracture of brittle metallic glasses: brittleness or plasticity. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[31]  R. Raghavan,et al.  Micropillar compression studies on a bulk metallic glass in different structural states , 2009 .

[32]  Global melting of Zr57Ti5Ni8Cu20Al10 bulk metallic glass under microcompression , 2007 .

[33]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Size-independent strength and deformation mode in compression of a Pd-based metallic glass , 2008 .

[34]  D. Dimiduk,et al.  Sample Dimensions Influence Strength and Crystal Plasticity , 2004, Science.

[35]  J. D. De Hosson,et al.  Strength of submicrometer diameter pillars of metallic glasses investigated with in situ transmission electron microscopy , 2009 .

[36]  J. Langer,et al.  Dynamics of viscoplastic deformation in amorphous solids , 1997, cond-mat/9712114.

[37]  Jian Xu,et al.  Critical size and strength of the best bulk metallic glass former in the Mg-Cu-Gd ternary system , 2007 .

[38]  T. Nieh,et al.  Sample size effect and microcompression of Mg65Cu25Gd10 metallic glass , 2007 .