Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations

Our research considered how the language used in marital conversations reflects the nature and definition of close relationships. Two linguistic themes with broad relational implications were identified from previous work: (a) linguistic elaboration, and (b) personal reference. These features were assumed to reflect, respectively, the efficiency of communication and the degree of differentiation versus integration of identities in marriage. In order to test the presumed relational implications of language, we compared indicators of linguistic elaboration and personal reference with relationship characteristics, including marital type, satisfaction, and age. One hundred‐twenty conversations from three prior studies were coded for a number of linguistic and pragmatic features. The results did not support expected associations between elaboration and other relationship characteristics. However, the research mostly supported the presumed relational implications of personal reference. Traditional, satisfied, a...

[1]  E. G. Bormann.  Symbolic Convergence Theory and Communication in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[2]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Life-Stage Differences in Communication During Marital Conflicts , 1988 .

[3]  J. Overall,et al.  Applied multivariate analysis , 1983 .

[4]  D. Olson,et al.  Circumplex model of marital and family system: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. , 1979, Family process.

[5]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[6]  Robert A. Bell,et al.  Idiomatic Communication and Interpersonal Solidarity in Friends’ Relational Cultures , 1992 .

[7]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture and interpersonal communication , 1988 .

[8]  William Lehr,et al.  Inside the Family , 1976 .

[9]  N. Coupland,et al.  Discourse and lifespan identity , 1993 .

[10]  R. Hopper.  THE TAKEN-FOR-GRANTED , 1981 .

[11]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Communication and Conflict in Marriage , 1983 .

[12]  Predicting Marital Quality with Narrative Assessments of Marital Experience , 1993 .

[13]  William B. Stiles,et al.  Describing talk : a taxonomy of verbal response modes , 1992 .

[14]  J. Bradac.  The Language of Lovers, Flovers, and Friends: Communicating in Social and Personal Relationships , 1983 .

[15]  John Scanzoni,et al.  Family Decision-Making: A Developmental Sex Role Model , 1981 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  K. Danziger.  CHAPTER 1 – The Manipulation of Interpersonal Communication , 1976 .

[18]  M. Knapp,et al.  Couples' personal idioms: exploring intimate talk. , 1981, The Journal of communication.

[19]  H. Locke.  Predicting adjustment in marriage : a comparison of a divorced and a happily married group , 1951 .

[20]  Alan L. Sillars.  Communication and Family Culture , 1995 .

[21]  D. Reiss.  The Family's Construction of Reality , 1982 .

[22]  B. Bernstein.  Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language , 1972 .

[23]  L. Acitelli.  You, Me, and Us: Perspectives on Relationship Awareness , 1993 .

[24]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Decision-Making Styles in Couples , 1989 .

[25]  Hal Witteman,et al.  Interpersonal Communication in the Casual Interaction of Marital Partners , 1984 .

[26]  Thomas S. Frentz,et al.  Language‐action: A paradigm for communication , 1976 .

[27]  Donald G. Ellis,et al.  Syntactic and Pragmatic Codes in Communication , 1992 .

[28]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Content Themes in Marital Conversations , 1987 .

[29]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[30]  N. Buerkel-Rothfuss,et al.  “Did You Bring the Yarmulke for the Cabbage Patch Kid?” The Idiomatic Communication of Young Lovers , 1987 .

[31]  Frank D. Fincham,et al.  The role of attributions in the development of dating relationships. , 1987 .

[32]  Barbara Westbrook Eakins,et al.  Sex differences in human communication , 1978 .

[33]  P. Arntson.  Testing Basil Bernstein's Sociolinguistic Theories , 1982 .

[34]  G. Blake Armstrong,et al.  Class, gender, and code on prime‐time television , 1989 .

[35]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Language Within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication , 1968 .

[36]  W. Ickes,et al.  Managing empathic accuracy in close relationships , 1997 .

[37]  M. Knapp,et al.  Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms , 1980 .

[38]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Communication and Understanding Revisited , 1990 .

[39]  G. Spanier.  Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .

[40]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes , 1964 .

[41]  M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dyadic adjustment in relational types: Consensus, cohesion, affectional expression, and satisfaction in enduring relationships , 1979 .

[42]  J. Cuber,et al.  sex and the significant Americans : a study of sexual behavior among the affluent , 1966 .

[43]  P. Berger,et al.  Marriage and the Construction of Reality , 1964 .

[44]  T. Stephen.  Fixed-Sequence and Circular-Causal Models of Relationship Development: Divergent Views on the Role of Communication in Intimacy. , 1985 .

[45]  C. Berger,et al.  Goals, Plans, and Mutual Understanding in Relationships , 1993 .

[46]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .

[47]  Margaret McLaughlin,et al.  Conversation: How Talk Is Organized , 1984 .

[48]  Conversational Themes and Marital Relationship Definitions Quantitative and Qualitative Investigations , 1992 .

[49]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Syntactic and pragmatic code usage in interpersonal communication , 1985 .