From rational numbers to algebra: separable contributions of decimal magnitude and relational understanding of fractions.

To understand the development of mathematical cognition and to improve instructional practices, it is critical to identify early predictors of difficulty in learning complex mathematical topics such as algebra. Recent work has shown that performance with fractions on a number line estimation task predicts algebra performance, whereas performance with whole numbers on similar estimation tasks does not. We sought to distinguish more specific precursors to algebra by measuring multiple aspects of knowledge about rational numbers. Because fractions are the first numbers that are relational expressions to which students are exposed, we investigated how understanding the relational bipartite format (a/b) of fractions might connect to later algebra performance. We presented middle school students with a battery of tests designed to measure relational understanding of fractions, procedural knowledge of fractions, and placement of fractions, decimals, and whole numbers onto number lines as well as algebra performance. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the best predictors of algebra performance were measures of relational fraction knowledge and ability to place decimals (not fractions or whole numbers) onto number lines. These findings suggest that at least two specific components of knowledge about rational numbers--relational understanding (best captured by fractions) and grasp of unidimensional magnitude (best captured by decimals)--can be linked to early success with algebraic expressions.

[1]  Sue Betka,et al.  National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance , 2015 .

[2]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  George Brown,et al.  Algebra Students' Difficulty with Fractions: An Error Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Rapid Communication: Understanding the Real Value of Fractions and Decimals , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Trevor Williams,et al.  Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context. NCES 2009-001. , 2008 .

[6]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics , 2012 .

[8]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. , 2008, Child development.

[9]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  R. Siegler,et al.  Early Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement , 2012, Psychological science.

[11]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman? , 2012 .

[12]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  4 Quantitative Reasoning and the Development of Algebraic Reasoning , 2007 .

[13]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Development of Numerical Estimation , 2004 .

[14]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Modeling discrete and continuous entities with fractions and decimals. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[15]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decimal fraction representations are not distinct from natural number representations – evidence from a combined eye-tracking and computational modeling approach , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  Equal sharing and shared meaning: The development of fraction concepts in a first-grade classroom , 1999 .

[17]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  The Algebraic Nature of Fractions: Developing Relational Thinking in Elementary School , 2011 .

[18]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. , 2008, Child development.

[19]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Conceptual structure and the procedural affordances of rational numbers: relational reasoning with fractions and decimals. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  The gains and the pitfalls of reification — The case of algebra , 1994 .

[21]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Development of numerical estimation in young children. , 2004, Child development.