On-line statistical detection of average evoked potentials: application to evoked response audiometry (ERA).

An objective method of EP detection in averaged EEG epochs is described which is based on the statistical properties of the averaged EEG in the absence of time-locked EP activity. The statistical properties of the subject's averaged background EEG are summarized by making a set of comparisons between two consecutive EEG epochs immediately preceding each stimulus presentation. After every stimulus presentation, a second set of comparisons is made between the post-stimulus EEG epoch and the immediately preceding pre-stimulus EEG epoch. These two sets of comparisons are then examined to determine whether the latter differ significantly from the former. The technique has been programmed for on-line use on a 12-bit minicomputer, validated on cooperative adult subjects and used for ERA threshold determinations in young children. Using response detection criteria yielding an empirically determined false positive error rate of between 1 and 4%, threshold estimates averaged about 10 dB higher than psychophysical thresholds. The efficiency with which such ERA thresholds may be obtained with this method is substantially greater than that of conventional ERA procedures employing subjective evaluation of averages. Further, the technique allows variation of detection criteria to suit non-audiometric needs and empirical determination of the false-positive error rate under any set of conditions.

[1]  D. Kline,et al.  Spinal cord potentials evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  J A Orpin,et al.  Evoked response audiometry in newborn infants. , 1969, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[4]  J. V. Bradley.  Distribution-Free Statistical Tests , 1968 .

[5]  M. Cohen,et al.  Improving evoked response audiometry with special reference to the use of machine scoring. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  J. Cohen.  Very slow brain potentials relating to expectancy - The CNV , 1969 .

[7]  T. Allison,et al.  A New Procedure for Assessing Reliability of Scoring EEG Sleep Recordings , 1971 .

[8]  H. Fruhstorfer,et al.  Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  T. Allison,et al.  Effects of Thiopental on Human Cerebral Evoked Responses , 1963, Anesthesiology.

[10]  C. Elberling,et al.  The role of sedation in ERA from the vertex. , 1973, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  J. Tecce.  Contingent negative variation and individual differences. A new approach in brain research. , 1971, Archives of general psychiatry.

[12]  H. Davis,et al.  Adult auditory evoked vertex potentials in sleep. , 1973, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[13]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Reliability of the contingent negative variation and the auditory evoked potential. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Sandler,et al.  A test of the significance of the difference between the means of correlated measures, based on a simplification of student's t. , 1955, British journal of psychology.

[15]  G. Salomon.  Electric response audiometry (ERA) based on rank correlation. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  R. H. Jones,et al.  Change detection model for serially correlated multivariate data. , 1970, Biometrics.

[17]  S. Sutton,et al.  The specification of psychological variables in an average evoked potential experiment. , 1969 .

[18]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[19]  H Weinberg,et al.  The recognition index: a pattern recognition technique for noisy signals. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  Sayers Bm,et al.  Objective evaluation of auditory evoked EEG responses. , 1974 .

[21]  D. Regan.  Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine , 1972 .

[22]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  E. Donchin,et al.  A simulation study of the efficacy of stepwise discriminant analysis in the detection and comparison of event related potentials. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Wepman.  Modern Developments in Audiology. 2nd ed. , 1973 .

[25]  L. Heller,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF WORDS. , 1964, Psychoanalytic review.

[26]  D. T. Cody,et al.  Some physiologic aspects of the averaged vertex response in humans. , 1973, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  R. Goldstein,et al.  The Averaged Evoked Response to Auditory Stimulation , 1966 .

[28]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Selective attention and evoked potentials inhumans — A critical review , 1975, Biological Psychology.

[29]  R G Bickford,et al.  Cortical audiometry: an objective method of evaluating auditory acuity in awake and sleeping man. , 1967, Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[30]  W. Trojaborg,et al.  Evoked cortical potentials in patients with "isoelectric" EEGs. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  E. Taub,et al.  Summated Cortical Evoked Response Testing in the Deafferented Primate , 1972, Science.