Formal linguistics as a cue to demographic history.

Beyond its theoretical success, the development of molecular genetics has brought about the possibility of extraordinary progress in the study of classification and in the inference of the evolutionary history of many species and populations. A major step forward was represented by the availability of extremely large sets of molecular data suited to quantitative and computational treatments. In this paper, we argue that even in cognitive sciences, purely theoretical progress in a discipline such as linguistics may have analogous impact. Thus, exactly on the model of molecular biology, we propose to unify two traditionally unrelated lines of linguistic investigation: 1) the formal study of syntactic variation (parameter theory) in the biolinguistic program; 2) the reconstruction of relatedness among languages (phylogenetic taxonomy). The results of our linguistic analysis have thus been plotted against data from population genetics and the correlations have turned out to be largely significant: given a non-trivial set of languages/populations, the description of their variation provided by the comparison of systematic parametric analysis and molecular anthropology informatively recapitulates their history and relationships. As a result, we can claim that the reality of some parametric model of the language faculty and language acquisition/transmission (more broadly of generative grammar) receives strong and original support from its historical heuristic power. Then, on these grounds, we can begin testing Darwin's prediction that, when properly generated, the trees of human populations and of their languages should eventually turn out to be significantly parallel.

[1]  R. Gray,et al.  Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin , 2003, Nature.

[2]  April M. S. McMahon,et al.  Language classification by numbers , 2005 .

[3]  R R Sokal,et al.  Zones of sharp genetic change in Europe are also linguistic boundaries. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  G. Barbujani,et al.  What do languages tell us about human microevolution? , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Cristina Guardiano,et al.  Toward a syntactic phylogeny of modern Indo-European languages , 2013 .

[6]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Tools from evolutionary biology shed new light on the diversification of languages , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Tandy Warnow,et al.  Indo‐European and Computational Cladistics , 2002 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[9]  Cristina Guardiano,et al.  Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness , 2009 .

[10]  Comrie Bernard Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[11]  G. Barbujani,et al.  Worldwide analysis of multiple microsatellites: language diversity has a detectable influence on DNA diversity. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  T. Biberauer The limits of syntactic variation , 2008 .

[13]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior , 1980 .

[14]  Simon J. Greenhill,et al.  Mapping the Origins and Expansion of the Indo-European Language Family , 2012, Science.

[15]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[16]  Scott M. Williams,et al.  The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans , 2009, Science.

[17]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Word order universals , 1983 .

[18]  Jonathan Norton Leonard,et al.  The first farmers , 1973 .

[19]  Juliane Freud,et al.  How To Set Parameters Arguments From Language Change , 2016 .

[20]  W. Strange Evolution of language. , 1984, JAMA.

[21]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[22]  C. Downes,et al.  Comparison of maternal lineage and biogeographic analyses of ancient and modern Hungarian populations. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  D. Falush,et al.  A Genetic Atlas of Human Admixture History , 2014, Science.

[24]  A Piazza,et al.  Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Mägi,et al.  Genetic Structure of Europeans: A View from the North–East , 2009, PloS one.

[26]  Mark C. Baker The Atoms of Language , 1987 .

[27]  Richard S. Kayne Parameters and universals , 2000 .

[28]  R R Sokal,et al.  Genetic, geographic, and linguistic distances in Europe. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Simon J. Greenhill Levenshtein Distances Fail to Identify Language Relationships Accurately , 2011, CL.

[30]  Clive Gamble,et al.  First Farmers: the Origins of Agricultural Societies, by Peter Bellwood. Malden (MA): Blackwell, 2005; ISBN 0-631-20565-9 hardback £60; ISBN 0-631-20566-7 paperback £17.99, xix+360 pp., 59 figs., 3 tables , 2007, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[31]  Mark Durie,et al.  The comparative method reviewed : regularity and irregularity in language change , 1997 .

[32]  R. Cann The history and geography of human genes , 1995, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[33]  W. Kress,et al.  Speaking of Forked Tongues: the feasibility of reconciling human phylogeny and language , 1990 .

[34]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[35]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Language as a natural object – linguistics as a natural science , 2005 .

[36]  D. F. Roberts,et al.  The History and Geography of Human Genes , 1996 .

[37]  Don Ringe The Mathematics of 'Amerind' , 1996 .

[38]  Cristina Guardiano,et al.  Parametric Comparison and Language Taxonomy , 2005 .

[39]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history , 2003 .

[40]  Theresa Biberauer,et al.  Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory , 2010 .

[41]  Cristina Guardiano,et al.  Across language families: Genome diversity mirrors linguistic variation within Europe , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[42]  Comparison of mtDNA haplogroups in Hungarians with four other European populations: a small incidence of descents with Asian origin. , 2007, Acta biologica Hungarica.

[43]  N. Pierce Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[44]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  The biolinguistic enterprise : new perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty , 2011 .

[45]  A. Chapelle,et al.  Disease gene mapping in isolated human populations: the example of Finland. , 1993, Journal of medical genetics.

[46]  Colin Renfrew,et al.  ARCHAEOLOGY, GENETICS AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY* , 1992 .

[47]  David Lightfoot,et al.  How New Languages Emerge , 2006 .

[48]  Amit R. Indap,et al.  Genes mirror geography within Europe , 2008, Nature.

[49]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[50]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[51]  Luca Bortolussi,et al.  How many possible languages are there? , 2011, Biology, Computation and Linguistics.

[52]  Bart de Boer,et al.  The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar; Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002, Artificial Life.