Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery.

BACKGROUND Hospital mortality that is associated with inpatient surgery varies widely. Reducing rates of postoperative complications, the current focus of payers and regulators, may be one approach to reducing mortality. However, effective management of complications once they have occurred may be equally important. METHODS We studied 84,730 patients who had undergone inpatient general and vascular surgery from 2005 through 2007, using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We first ranked hospitals according to their risk-adjusted overall rate of death and divided them into five groups. For hospitals in each overall mortality quintile, we then assessed the incidence of overall and major complications and the rate of death among patients with major complications. RESULTS Rates of death varied widely across hospital quintiles, from 3.5% in very-low-mortality hospitals to 6.9% in very-high-mortality hospitals. Hospitals with either very high mortality or very low mortality had similar rates of overall complications (24.6% and 26.9%, respectively) and of major complications (18.2% and 16.2%, respectively). Rates of individual complications did not vary significantly across hospital mortality quintiles. In contrast, mortality in patients with major complications was almost twice as high in hospitals with very high overall mortality as in those with very low overall mortality (21.4% vs. 12.5%, P<0.001). Differences in rates of death among patients with major complications were also the primary determinant of variation in overall mortality with individual operations. CONCLUSIONS In addition to efforts aimed at avoiding complications in the first place, reducing mortality associated with inpatient surgery will require greater attention to the timely recognition and management of complications once they occur.

[1]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Death After Surgery: A Study of Adverse Occurrence and Failure to Rescue , 1992, Medical care.

[2]  M. Levy,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[3]  A. Jawad,et al.  The Relationship Between Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes , 2003, The Journal of nursing administration.

[4]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  A human factors engineering conceptual framework of nursing workload and patient safety in intensive care units. , 2005, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[5]  B. Gordon.  Current procedural terminology , 1966 .

[6]  A C Almendral,et al.  Surgical procedures. , 1981, Current topics in pathology. Ergebnisse der Pathologie.

[7]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. , 1999, JAMA.

[8]  A Milstein,et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  A. Houghton,et al.  Variation in outcome of surgical procedures , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  J. Vincent,et al.  Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster. , 2008, Journal of critical care.

[12]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[13]  C. Hui.  Perioperative Stroke , 2008 .

[14]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Intensive care unit physician staffing: Financial modeling of the Leapfrog standard* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[15]  L. Aiken,et al.  Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. , 2002, JAMA.

[16]  F. Grover,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[17]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. , 2004, Surgery.

[18]  W. Berry,et al.  A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1995, JAMA.

[20]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  A spurious correlation between hospital mortality and complication rates: the importance of severity adjustment. , 1997, Medical care.