Ethical Implications of Social Internet of Vehicles Systems

The core concept of Internet of Things (IoT) is to equip real world objects with computing, processing, and communicating capabilities to enable socializing between them. Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is an adherent of IoT that has realized significant advancements using communication technologies. Vehicles connected through Internet are capable of sharing information that can substantially enhance the quality of traffic on roads. Social IoT (SIoT) is an instance of IoT that deals specifically in socialization of connected objects. SIoT enables the notion of Social IoV (SIoV) where vehicles are the key entities for sharing information between themselves and the infrastructure (commonly known as road side units). Vehicles in SIoV socialize by exchanging data such as traffic congestions, weather conditions, infotainment, vacant parking slots, alternate routes, and discount coupons for restaurants. In SIoV, vehicles can communicate with other vehicles and infrastructure through traditional communication technologies like Wi-Fi, cellular networks or through dedicated short range communication, etc. SIoV will be confronted with ethical dilemmas and expected to function in an ethically responsible manner. This paper highlights the ethical implications of SIoV systems. Vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to infrastructure involves autonomous decision making that requires setting ethical and moral rules before taking verdict. This paper discusses the lack of ethical guidelines in designing and deploying of SIoV systems that are of utmost importance. Finally, an addition to SIoV architecture is proposed to incorporate the ethical and moral principles for scheming the SIoV systems.

[1]  Van Duc Nguyen,et al.  Location-aware and load-balanced data delivery at road-side units in vehicular Ad hoc networks , 2010, IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE 2010).

[2]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges , 2010, Telecommunication Systems.

[3]  Chris Schwarz,et al.  Towards Autonomous Vehicles , 2013 .

[4]  Maryam Rashidi,et al.  Placement of Road Side Units for floating car data collection in highway scenario , 2012, 2012 IV International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems.

[5]  Miguel Ángel Sotelo,et al.  Real-time system for monitoring driver vigilance , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2005. ISIE 2005..

[6]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles , 2015, Science.

[7]  Eong Jinkyu,et al.  What is the Trolley Problem , 2015 .

[8]  Sara Lumbreras,et al.  The Limits of Machine Ethics , 2017 .

[9]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Internet of Vehicles: Architecture, Protocols, and Security , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[10]  Abdulmotaleb El-Saddik,et al.  Toward Social Internet of Vehicles: Concept, Architecture, and Applications , 2015, IEEE Access.

[11]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles , 2018, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[12]  James S. Albus,et al.  4D/RCS: a reference model architecture for intelligent unmanned ground vehicles , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Leandros A. Maglaras,et al.  Social Internet of Vehicles for Smart Cities , 2016, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[14]  An,et al.  A Survey on Internet of Things for SmartVehicles , 2016 .

[15]  Zhiwei Zhu,et al.  Real-time nonintrusive monitoring and prediction of driver fatigue , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  A seven-layered model architecture for Internet of Vehicles , 2017, J. Inf. Telecommun..

[17]  Anna Maria Vegni,et al.  A Survey on Vehicular Social Networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[18]  Keiichi Uchimura,et al.  Driver Inattention Monitoring System for Intelligent Vehicles: A Review , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  T. Zia,et al.  Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks (VANETs): An Overview and Challenges , 2013 .

[20]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Implementation and performance measurement of a V2X communication system for vehicle and pedestrian safety , 2016, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[21]  R. Mason.  Four ethical issues of the information age , 1986 .

[22]  James S. Albus,et al.  Using 4D/RCS to Address AI Knowledge Integration , 2006, AI Mag..

[23]  Aniruddha S. Gokhale,et al.  Voronoi-based placement of road-side units to improve dynamic resource management in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[24]  Hassan Artail,et al.  Managing Social Networks in vehicular networks using trust rules , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology and Applications (ISWTA).

[25]  Jonathan Loo,et al.  Providing ubiquitous communication using road-side units in VANET systems: Unveiling the challenges , 2013, 2013 13th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[26]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes , 2014, ArXiv.

[27]  Francine Berman,et al.  Social and ethical behavior in the internet of things , 2017, Commun. ACM.

[28]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Fog computing: A cloud to the ground support for smart things and machine-to-machine networks , 2014, 2014 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC).

[29]  James H. Moor,et al.  The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[30]  Christian Blum,et al.  Simulation-Based Internal Models for Safer Robots , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.