Multistate Evaluation of Safe Routes to School Programs

Purpose. State Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs provide competitive grants to local projects that support safe walking, bicycling, and other modes of active school travel (AST). This study assessed changes in rates of AST after implementation of SRTS projects at multiple sites across four states. Design. One-group pretest and posttest. Setting. Florida, Mississippi, Washington, and Wisconsin. Subjects. Convenience sample of 48 completed SRTS projects and 53 schools affected by a completed SRTS project. Intervention. State-funded SRTS project. Measures. AST was measured as the percentage of students walking, bicycling, or using any AST mode. SRTS project characteristics were measured at the project, school, and school neighborhood levels. Analysis. Paired-samples t-tests were used to assess changes in AST. Bivariate analysis was used to identify SRTS project characteristics associated with increases in AST. Data were analyzed separately at the project (n = 48) and school (n = 53) levels. Results. Statistically significant increases in AST were observed across projects in all four states. All AST modes increased from 12.9% to 17.6%; walking from 9.8% to 14.2%; and bicycling from 2.5% to 3.0%. Increases in rates of bicycling were negatively correlated with baseline rates of bicycling. Conclusion. State-funded SRTS projects are achieving one of the primary program goals of increasing rates of AST. They may be particularly effective at introducing bicycling to communities where it is rare. The evaluation framework introduced in this study can be used to continue tracking the effect of state SRTS programs as more projects are completed.

[1]  G. Sandercock,et al.  Aerobic fitness and mode of travel to school in English schoolchildren. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Guohua Li,et al.  Effectiveness of a Safe Routes to School Program in Preventing School-Aged Pedestrian Injury , 2013, Pediatrics.

[3]  Noreen C McDonald,et al.  Critical factors for active transportation to school among low-income and minority students. Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Promoting cycling: a review of interventions. , 2011, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[5]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Safe Routes to school parent and student surveys , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[6]  Deborah A Hubsmith Safe Routes to School in the United States , 2006 .

[7]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment. , 2012, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  Lin Lin,et al.  Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Statewide Mobility Assessment Study Phase I Report , 2010 .

[9]  Noreen C. McDonald,et al.  Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school , 2007 .

[10]  L. Gauvin,et al.  Sustained active transportation is associated with a favorable body mass index trajectory across the early school years: findings from the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development birth cohort. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[11]  Lin Lin,et al.  SO MANY CHOICES, SO MANY WAYS TO CHOOSE: HOW FIVE STATE DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION SELECT SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL FOR FUNDING , 2011 .

[12]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  A Census of Schools and School Neighborhoods in Five States , 2012 .

[13]  L. Titus,et al.  Influence of Sports, Physical Education, and Active Commuting to School on Adolescent Weight Status , 2012, Pediatrics.

[14]  S. Biddle,et al.  Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Evaluation of a walking school bus for promoting physical activity in youth. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.

[16]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  MOVING FORWARD: SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRESS IN FIVE STATES , 2012 .

[17]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Active commuting to school and association with physical activity and adiposity among US youth. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[18]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Common ground: Eight factors that influence walking and biking to school , 2012 .

[19]  Possible Mechanisms Explaining the Association Between Physical Activity and Mental Health , 2013 .

[20]  T. Baranowski,et al.  The Walking School Bus and Children's Physical Activity: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Pediatrics.

[21]  M. Miller Agency , 2010 .

[22]  C. O'brien,et al.  Fun, Fast and Fit: Influences and Motivators for Teenagers Who Cycle to School , 2023, Children, Youth and Environments.

[23]  N. McDonald,et al.  U.S. school travel, 2009 an assessment of trends. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  Validity of instruments to assess students' travel and pedestrian safety , 2010, BMC public health.

[25]  Xuemei Zhu,et al.  Walkability and safety around elementary schools economic and ethnic disparities. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.