Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating.

The goal of this study was to examine developmental effects in auditory perception of word-final /s/ in inflectional morpheme contexts as a function of high-frequency (HF) bandwidth. Such developmental effects may support the use of hearing aids with extended bandwidths in young children with impaired hearing. The first part of the study consisted of acoustical measurements on word-initial /s/ and inflectional morpheme /s/ in sentences recorded from a male speaker. For this speaker, recordings of inflectional morpheme /s/ on average were approximately 50 ms shorter and about 5 dB lower in level than word-initial /s/ sounds. They also had a lower spectral center of gravity, but not a higher coefficient of kurtosis. The second part consisted of measurements of psychometric functions relating detection of the inflectional morpheme /s/ sounds to HF bandwidth in normally hearing 5-, 7-, and 10-year-old children and adults. In speech-shaped noise, significant main effects of age were found for detection as a function of bandwidth for both the 30- and 10-dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) condition, although there was no interaction between age and SNR condition. The third part consisted of subjective clarity rating as a function of HF bandwidth for the same speech stimuli used in the second part. No differences were found between age groups in the shape of the clarity rating functions, but differences were found in the rating variance. No systematic effects of the spectral composition of inflectional morpheme /s/ sounds on either detection or clarity rating were found. The higher detection thresholds and larger clarity rating variances for the youngest participants support the use of extended high-frequency bandwidths for young children with impaired hearing. The extent to which the potential benefit of extended bandwidths is affected by hearing impairment in this population, however, deserves further investigation.

[1]  H Dai,et al.  On measuring psychometric functions: a comparison of the constant-stimulus and adaptive up-down methods. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  H. Winitz,et al.  The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Jongman Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Boothroyd The Discrimination by Partially Hearing Children of Frequency Distorted Speech , 1967 .

[7]  O Dyrlund,et al.  Digital feedback suppression (DFS). Characterization of feedback-margin improvements in a DFS hearing instrument. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.

[8]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[9]  P Allen,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of complex sounds by school-aged children and adults. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S. Blumstein,et al.  On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D. Whalen Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[13]  F. Rudmin The Why and How of Hearing /s/. , 1983 .

[14]  S Nittrouer,et al.  Developmental weighting shifts for noise components of fricative-vowel syllables. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D D Dirks,et al.  Reliability and sensitivity of paired comparisons and category rating in children. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  D. Klatt The duration of (s) in English words. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S Nittrouer,et al.  Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C M Reed,et al.  A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  F. Wightman,et al.  Spectral pattern discrimination by children. , 1989 .

[21]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  S. Soli Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricative‐vowel coarticulation , 1981 .

[23]  John E. Markel,et al.  Linear Prediction of Speech , 1976, Communication and Cybernetics.

[24]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[25]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[26]  T E Hanna,et al.  Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  T Lunner,et al.  System identification of feedback in hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  F. Minifie,et al.  Effect of acoustic cues in fricatives on perceptual confusions in preschool children. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  James M. Kates,et al.  Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: results from a computer simulation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[31]  E. Owens,et al.  Consonant confusions associated with hearing loss above 2000 Hz. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[33]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Estimating psychometric functions in forced-choice situations: Significant biases found in threshold and slope estimations when small samples are used , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  M. Hardin-Jones,et al.  Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.