Multi-objective system reliability-based optimization method for design of a fully parametric concept car body

ABSTRACT This article investigates multi-objective optimization under reliability constraints with applications in vehicle structural design. To improve computational efficiency, an improved multi-objective system reliability-based design optimization (MOSRBDO) method is developed, and used to explore the lightweight and high-performance design of a concept car body under uncertainty. A parametric model knowledge base is established, followed by the construction of a fully parametric concept car body of a multi-purpose vehicle (FPCCB-MPV) based on the knowledge base. The structural shape, gauge and topology optimization are then designed on the basis of FPCCB-MPV. The numerical implementation of MOSRBDO employs the double-loop method with design optimization in the outer loop and system reliability analysis in the inner loop. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization is used as the outer loop optimization solver. An improved multi-modal radial-based importance sampling (MRBIS) method is utilized as the system reliability solver for multi-constraint analysis in the inner loop. The accuracy and efficiency of the MRBIS method are demonstrated on three widely used test problems. In conclusion, MOSRBDO has been successfully applied for the design of a full parametric concept car body. The results show that the improved MOSRBDO method is more effective and efficient than the traditional MOSRBDO while achieving the same accuracy, and that the optimized body-in-white structure signifies a noticeable improvement from the baseline model.

[1]  F. Grooteman Adaptive radial-based importance sampling method for structural reliability , 2008 .

[2]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Lightweight design of automobile component using high strength steel based on dent resistance , 2006 .

[3]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  Reliability-Based Vehicle Safety Assessment and Design Optimization of Roadway Radius and Speed Limit in Windy Environments , 2014 .

[5]  B. Youn,et al.  Enriched Performance Measure Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization. , 2005 .

[6]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Non-probabilistic reliability sensitivity analysis of the model of structural systems with interval variables whose state of dependence is determined by constraints , 2013 .

[7]  Zhonglai Wang,et al.  Reliability sensitivity analysis for structural systems in interval probability form , 2011 .

[8]  B. Ellingwood,et al.  Directional methods for structural reliability analysis , 2000 .

[9]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization , 2004 .

[10]  R. Melchers Importance sampling in structural systems , 1989 .

[11]  Hongzhong Huang,et al.  A novel reliability method for structural systems with truncated random variables , 2014 .

[12]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Aerodynamic configuration design using response surface methodology analysis , 1993 .

[13]  Kiran Solanki,et al.  System reliability based vehicle design for crashworthiness and effects of various uncertainty reduction measures , 2009 .

[14]  Yasuhiro Mori,et al.  Multinormal integrals by importance sampling for series system reliability , 2003 .

[15]  Kaushik Sinha,et al.  Reliability-based multiobjective optimization for automotive crashworthiness and occupant safety , 2007 .

[16]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  A general procedure for first/second-order reliabilitymethod (FORM/SORM) , 1999 .

[17]  S. Chakraborty,et al.  Reliability analysis of structures by iterative improved response surface method , 2016 .

[18]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Metamodel-based lightweight design of B-pillar with TWB structure via support vector regression , 2010 .

[19]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  Reliability-based optimization of lightweight automotive structures for crashworthiness , 2006 .

[20]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances , 1986 .

[21]  G. Wen,et al.  Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of honeycomb-filled single and bitubular polygonal tubes , 2011 .

[22]  J. Beck,et al.  Important sampling in high dimensions , 2003 .

[23]  A. Harbitz An efficient sampling method for probability of failure calculation , 1986 .

[24]  Aiguo Cheng,et al.  Crashworthiness design of vehicle structure with tailor rolled blank , 2016 .

[25]  Jeong‐Soo Park Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments , 1994 .

[26]  Qing Li,et al.  Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming , 2010 .

[27]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Lightweight design of vehicle front–end structure: contributions of multiple surrogates , 2011 .

[28]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  A direct decoupling approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization , 2006 .

[29]  Guanlong Chen,et al.  Use of high strength steel sheet for lightweight and crashworthy car body , 2003 .

[30]  Pingfeng Wang,et al.  An Integrated Performance Measure Approach for System Reliability Analysis , 2015 .

[31]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[32]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .

[33]  Zhonglai Wang,et al.  Unified uncertainty analysis by the mean value first order saddlepoint approximation , 2012 .

[34]  O. Ditlevsen Narrow Reliability Bounds for Structural Systems , 1979 .

[35]  Rui Zou,et al.  Neural Network Embedded Monte Carlo Approach for Water Quality Modeling under Input Information Uncertainty , 2002 .