There are fundamental differences in the way fingerprints are compared by forensic examiners and current automatic systems. For example, while automatic systems focus mainly on the quantitative measures of fingerprint minutiae (ridge ending and bifurcation points), forensic examiners often analyze details of intrinsic ridge characteristics and relational information. This process, known as qualitative friction ridge analysis [1], includes examination of ridge shape, pores, dots, incipient ridges, etc. This explains the challenges that current automatic systems face in processing partial fingerprints, mostly seen in latents. The forensics and automatic fingerprint identification systems (AFIS) communities have been active in standardizing the definition of extended feature set, as well as quantifying the relevance and reliability of these features for automatic matching systems. CDEFFS (committee to define an extended feature set) has proposed a working draft on possible definitions and representations of extended features [2]. However, benefits of utilizing these extended features in automatic systems are not yet known. While fingerprint matching technology is quite mature for matching tenprints [3], matching partial fingerprints, especially latents, still needs a lot of improvement. We propose an algorithm to extract two major level 3 feature types, dots and incipients, based on local phase symmetry and demonstrate their effectiveness in partial print matching. Since dots and incipients can be easily encoded by forensic examiners, we believe the results of this research will have benefits to next generation identification (NGI) systems.
[1]
David R. Ashbaugh,et al.
Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology
,
1999
.
[2]
T. Busey,et al.
Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts
,
2005,
Vision Research.
[3]
Peter Kovesi,et al.
Symmetry and Asymmetry from Local Phase
,
1997
.
[4]
Craig I. Watson,et al.
Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation 2003: Summary of Results and Analysis Report
,
2004
.
[5]
J. Dillinger.
FINGERPRINTS
,
1938
.
[6]
Anil K. Jain,et al.
Pores and Ridges: Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features
,
2006,
18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).
[7]
Martin Rumpf,et al.
A Continuous Skeletonization Method Based on Level Sets
,
2002,
VisSym.
[8]
Jonathan D. Stosz,et al.
Automated system for fingerprint authentication using pores and ridge structure
,
1994,
Optics & Photonics.
[9]
A. R. Roddy,et al.
Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates
,
1997
.