Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests

Abstract Objectives To provide a clinical laboratory perspective on the Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development Act (VALID) discussion draft. This potential legislative effort, if enacted, would overhaul the regulatory oversight of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) in the United States and create a single system for regulation of conventional IVDs and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). Methods A concise literature-based review of LDT regulation is presented followed by a discussion of key concerns pertinent to clinical laboratories that should be considered in future IVD regulatory reform efforts. Results Key issues identified include the importance of fostering innovation, preserving patient safety, protecting the practice of laboratory medicine, and minimizing undue regulatory burden. Clinical laboratories are not equivalent to manufacturing facilities and would therefore encounter challenges in implementing device-centric regulatory oversight models. Conclusions It is imperative that a clinical laboratory perspective on LDTs is understood and incorporated prior to advancement of future legislative proposals.

[1]  G. Norman,et al.  Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes , 2016 .

[2]  Van Norman Ga Drugs, Devices, and the FDA: Part 2: An Overview of Approval Processes: FDA Approval of Medical Devices. , 2016 .

[3]  C. Goodman,et al.  Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health , 1988 .

[4]  Christine L.H. Snozek,et al.  FDA-Cleared versus Laboratory-Developed Tests: Why Start from Scratch When Kits Are Available? , 2017, The journal of applied laboratory medicine.

[5]  M. Laposata,et al.  Reducing Diagnostic Errors Worldwide Through Diagnostic Management Teams , 2018, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[6]  Elaine Lyon,et al.  The Spectrum of Clinical Utilities in Molecular Pathology Testing Procedures for Inherited Conditions and Cancer: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[7]  Marc Levinson What Is Manufacturing? Why Does the Definition Matter? , 2017 .

[8]  D. Jeffery,et al.  US Food and Drug Administration Perspectives on Clinical Mass Spectrometry. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  W. Grody,et al.  The Case for Laboratory Developed Procedures , 2017, Academic pathology.

[10]  Annette S. Kim,et al.  Comparison of Laboratory-Developed Tests and FDA-Approved Assays for BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS Testing , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[11]  Ronald L Weiss,et al.  Laboratory-Developed Tests: A Legislative and Regulatory Review. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  G. Norman,et al.  Drugs, Devices, and the FDA: Part 2: An Overview of Approval Processes: FDA Approval of Medical Devices , 2016 .

[13]  Richard C. Friedberg,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 , 2017, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[14]  J. Genzen,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Proposed Risk Stratification Methods for Laboratory Developed Tests. , 2018, Laboratory medicine.

[15]  Van Norman Ga Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes. , 2016 .