The Accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian Red Cattle Assessed by Cross-Validation

Genomic Selection (GS) is a newly developed tool for the estimation of breeding values for quantitative traits through the use of dense markers covering the whole genome. For a successful application of GS, accuracy of the prediction of genomewide breeding value (GW-EBV) is a key issue to consider. Here we investigated the accuracy and possible bias of GW-EBV prediction, using real bovine SNP genotyping (18,991 SNPs) and phenotypic data of 500 Norwegian Red bulls. The study was performed on milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, first lactation mastitis traits, and calving ease. Three methods, best linear unbiased prediction (G-BLUP), Bayesian statistics (BayesB), and a mixture model approach (MIXTURE), were used to estimate marker effects, and their accuracy and bias were estimated by using cross-validation. The accuracies of the GW-EBV prediction were found to vary widely between 0.12 and 0.62. G-BLUP gave overall the highest accuracy. We observed a strong relationship between the accuracy of the prediction and the heritability of the trait. GW-EBV prediction for production traits with high heritability achieved higher accuracy and also lower bias than health traits with low heritability. To achieve a similar accuracy for the health traits probably more records will be needed.

[1]  M. Goddard,et al.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  R. Fernando,et al.  Factors Affecting Accuracy From Genomic Selection in Populations Derived From Multiple Inbred Lines: A Barley Case Study , 2009, Genetics.

[3]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  John A Woolliams,et al.  A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome-wide estimates of genetic value , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[5]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach , 2008, PloS one.

[6]  Sang Hong Lee,et al.  Predicting Unobserved Phenotypes for Complex Traits from Whole-Genome SNP Data , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[7]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Andrés Legarra,et al.  Performance of Genomic Selection in Mice , 2008, Genetics.

[9]  P. Munroe,et al.  Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[10]  M. Calus,et al.  Accuracy of Genomic Selection Using Different Methods to Define Haplotypes , 2008, Genetics.

[11]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genomic selection. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[12]  R. Fernando,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values , 2007, Genetics.

[13]  L. Schaeffer,et al.  Estimation of genome-wide haplotype effects in half-sib designs. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[14]  D. Gianola,et al.  Inferring fixed effects in a mixed linear model from an integrated likelihood , 2007 .

[15]  M P L Calus,et al.  Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[16]  L R Schaeffer,et al.  Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[17]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  Michel Georges,et al.  Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[20]  M. Mni,et al.  Fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci by identity by descent in outbred populations: application to milk production in dairy cattle. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  B. Silverman,et al.  Smoothed functional principal components analysis by choice of norm , 1996 .

[22]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Stochastic search variable selection , 1995 .

[23]  P M VanRaden,et al.  A method for combining United States and Canadian bull evaluations. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  C. R. Henderson,et al.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. , 1975, Biometrics.

[25]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  R. Spelman,et al.  Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. , 2009 .

[27]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .