Unsharp Values, Domains and Topoi

The so-called topos approach provides a radical reformulation of quantum theory. Structurally, quantum theory in the topos formulation is very similar to classical physics. There is a state object \(\underline\sum\), analogous to the state space of a classical system, and a quantity-value object \(\underline{\mathbb{R}^{\leftrightarrow}}\), generalising the real numbers. Physical quantities are maps from the state object to the quantity-value object – hence the ‘values’ of physical quantities are not just real numbers in this formalism. Rather, they are families of real intervals, interpreted as ‘unsharp values’. We will motivate and explain these aspects of the topos approach and show that the structure of the quantity-value object \(\underline{\mathbb{R}^{\leftrightarrow}}\) can be analysed using tools from domain theory, a branch of order theory that originated in theoretical computer science. Moreover, the base category of the topos associated with a quantum system turns out to be a domain if the underlying von Neumann algebra is a matrix algebra. For general algebras, the base category still is a highly structured poset. This gives a connection between the topos approach, noncommutative operator algebras and domain theory. In an outlook, we present some early ideas on how domains may become useful in the search for new models of (quantum) space and space-time.

[1]  Peter Lucas,et al.  Formal Semantics of Programming Languages: VDL , 1981, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[2]  C. Isham,et al.  The Representation of Physical Quantities With Arrows δ̆ o ( A ) : Σ → , 2007 .

[3]  Andreas Doering,et al.  Topos Theory and ‘Neo-Realist’ Quantum Theory , 2009 .

[4]  C. Flori A topos formulation of history quantum theory , 2010 .

[5]  Prakash Panangaden,et al.  A Domain of Spacetime Intervals in General Relativity , 2005, Spatial Representation.

[6]  Arka Bandyopadhyay A partial order on classical and quantum states , 2011 .

[7]  Dana S. Scott,et al.  Outline of a Mathematical Theory of Computation , 1970 .

[8]  Alan Bundy,et al.  Constructing Induction Rules for Deductive Synthesis Proofs , 2006, CLASE.

[9]  Bas Spitters,et al.  A Topos for Algebraic Quantum Theory , 2007, 0709.4364.

[10]  Bas Spitters,et al.  Bohrification of operator algebras and quantum logic , 2009, Synthese.

[11]  C. J. Isham,et al.  Topos Perspective on the Kochen=nSpeckerTheorem: III. Von Neumann Algebras as theBase Category , 1999 .

[12]  Martin Heidegger,et al.  What is a thing , 1967 .

[13]  C. J. Isham,et al.  A Topos Foundation for Theories of Physics: IV. Categories of Systems , 2008 .

[14]  Bas Spitters,et al.  Intuitionistic Quantum Logic of an n-level System , 2009, Foundations of Physics.

[15]  K. Hofmann,et al.  Continuous Lattices and Domains , 2003 .

[16]  Andreas Doering,et al.  “What is a Thing?”: Topos Theory in the Foundations of Physics , 2008, 0803.0417.

[17]  Chris J. Isham Deep Beauty: Topos Methods in the Foundations of Physics , 2011 .

[18]  Andreas Döring Kochen–Specker Theorem for von Neumann Algebras , 2005 .

[19]  C. J. Isham,et al.  Topos Perspective on the Kochen–Specker Theorem: IV. Interval Valuations , 2001 .

[20]  Andreas Doering The physical interpretation of daseinisation , 2010 .

[21]  Ying-Ming Liu,et al.  Solutions to two problems of J.D. Lawson and M. Mislove , 1996 .

[22]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  Domain theory , 1995, LICS 1995.

[23]  C. J. Isham,et al.  A topos foundation for theories of physics: I. Formal languages for physics , 2007 .

[24]  Martin Bojowald Quantum Gravity, Cosmology and Black Holes , 2009 .

[25]  Andreas Döring Topos Quantum Logic and Mixed States , 2011, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci..

[26]  C. J. Isham,et al.  A Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem II. Conceptual Aspects and Classical Analogues , 1998 .

[27]  C. J. Isham,et al.  Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem: I. Quantum States as Generalized Valuations , 1998, quant-ph/9803055.

[28]  C. J. Isham Topos theory and consistent histories: The internal logic of the set of all consistent sets , 1996 .

[29]  C. Isham,et al.  Some Possible Roles for Topos Theory in Quantum Theory and Quantum Gravity , 1999, gr-qc/9910005.

[30]  C. J. Isham,et al.  A topos foundation for theories of physics: II. Daseinisation and the liberation of quantum theory , 2008 .

[31]  Klaus Keimel,et al.  The way-below relation of function spaces over semantic domains , 1998 .

[32]  A. Doering,et al.  Quantum States and Measures on the Spectral Presheaf , 2008, 0809.4847.

[33]  A Topos Formulation of Consistent Histories , 2008, 0812.1290.