SNA as an Attractor in Emergent Networks of Research Groups

While many progressive enterprises are becoming more network-centric, many research-oriented organisations retain a traditional hierarchy with an ego-centric culture. Paradoxically, network-centrism is associated with technology, innovation and creativity, the hallmarks of cutting-edge research. Using concepts of emergence from complexity theory, this study takes a developmental, action research approach to the application of social network analysis in legitimising a network of research groups in a traditionally managed institution. The results indicate that an emergent network is as valid an organisational structure as an imposed hierarchy for research management. The study also demonstrates the use of social network analysis and similar technological applications in democratising organisational decision-making in respective of group innovation.

[1]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  City of Bits , 1995, CAADRIA proceedings.

[2]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[3]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Who owns my soul? The paradox of pursing organizational knowledge in a work culture of individualism , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[4]  Stephen Toulmin Perspectives on activity theory: Knowledge as shared procedures , 1999 .

[5]  Helen Hasan,et al.  The network centric environment viewed through the lens of Activity Theory , 2005 .

[6]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Knowledge networking: a holistic solution for leveraging corporate knowledge , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  M. Duijn,et al.  Software for social network analysis , 2005 .

[8]  V. Allee The future of knowledge : increasing prosperity through value networks , 2003 .

[9]  John G. Scott,et al.  Social Network Analysis as an Analytic Tool for Interaction Patterns in Primary Care Practices , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[11]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[12]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Network Conditions for Organizational Change , 2003 .

[13]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[14]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[15]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Action research in organisations , 2000 .

[16]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .