Cation-pi/H-bond stair motifs at protein-DNA interfaces.

H-bonds and cation-pi interactions between nucleic acid bases and amino acid side-chains are known to occur often concomitantly at the interface between protein and double-stranded DNA. Here we define and analyze stair-shaped motifs, which simultaneously involve base stacking, H-bond and cation-pi interactions. They consist of two successive bases along the DNA stack, one in cation-pi interaction with an amino acid side-chain that carries a total or partial positive charge, and the other H-bonded with the same side-chain. A survey of 52 high-resolution structures of protein/DNA complexes reveals the occurrence of such motifs in the majority of the complexes, the most frequent of these motifs involving Arg side-chains and G bases. These stair motifs are sometimes part of larger motifs, called multiple stair motifs, which contain several successive stairs; zinc finger proteins for example exhibit up to quadruple stairs. In another kind of stair motif extension, termed cation-pi chain motif, an amino acid side-chain or a nucleic acid base forms simultaneously two cation-pi interactions. Such a motif is observed in several homeodomains, where it involves a DNA base in cation-pi interactions with an Arg in the minor groove and an Asn in the major groove. A different cation-pi chain motif contains an Arg in cation-pi with a G and a Tyr, and is found in ets transcription factors. Still another chain motif is encountered in proteins that expulse a base from the DNA stack and replace it by an amino acid side-chain carrying a net or partial positive charge, which forms cation-pi interactions with the two neighboring bases along the DNA strand. The striking conservation of typical stair and cation-pi chain motifs within families of protein/DNA complexes suggests that they might play a structural and/or functional role and might moreover influence electron migration through the DNA double helix.

[1]  N S Scrutton,et al.  Cation-pi bonding and amino-aromatic interactions in the biomolecular recognition of substituted ammonium ligands. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[2]  M. Rooman,et al.  Structural classification of HTH DNA-binding domains and protein-DNA interaction modes. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Barton,et al.  DNA repair: models for damage and mismatch recognition. , 2000, Mutation research.

[5]  G A Petsko,et al.  Amino‐aromatic interactions in proteins , 1986, FEBS letters.

[6]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  T. Mak,et al.  Cooperative interaction between the DNA-binding domains of PU.1 and IRF4. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  G. Hampikian,et al.  Long-distance charge transport in duplex DNA: the phonon-assisted polaron-like hopping mechanism. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  N. Seeman,et al.  Sequence-specific Recognition of Double Helical Nucleic Acids by Proteins (base Pairs/hydrogen Bonding/recognition Fidelity/ion Binding) , 2022 .

[10]  D A Dougherty,et al.  Acetylcholine binding by a synthetic receptor: implications for biological recognition , 1990, Science.

[11]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Theoretical Studies of GG-Specific Photocleavage of DNA via Electron Transfer: Significant Lowering of Ionization Potential and 5‘-Localization of HOMO of Stacked GG Bases in B-Form DNA , 1996 .

[12]  V. Roberts,et al.  Stabilization of bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a pi-cation interaction. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  On the attribution of binding energy in antigen-antibody complexes McPC 603, D1.3, and HyHEL-5. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[14]  Y. Chinenov,et al.  Identification of Redox-sensitive Cysteines in GA-binding Protein-α That Regulate DNA Binding and Heterodimerization* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  M. Rooman,et al.  Contribution of cation-pi interactions to the stability of protein-DNA complexes. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  J. Barton,et al.  Evidence for DNA charge transport in the nucleus. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[17]  A. Laederach,et al.  The role of cation-pi interactions in biomolecular association. Design of peptides favoring interactions between cationic and aromatic amino acid side chains. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  A. Karlin,et al.  Electrostatic potential of the acetylcholine binding sites in the nicotinic receptor probed by reactions of binding-site cysteines with charged methanethiosulfonates. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[19]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Cation−π Interactions in Proteins: Can Simple Models Provide an Accurate Description? , 1999 .

[20]  J. Yodoi,et al.  Redox Regulation of the DNA Binding Activity in Transcription Factor PEBP2 , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  H. Hauser,et al.  Protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions affect the activity of lymphoid-specific IFN regulatory factors. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[22]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Do denaturants interact with aromatic hydrocarbons in water , 1993 .

[23]  D A Dougherty,et al.  Cation-pi interactions in aromatics of biological and medicinal interest: electrostatic potential surfaces as a useful qualitative guide. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Roberts,et al.  Protein-Modulated DNA Electron Transfer , 1999 .

[25]  J. Barton,et al.  How different DNA-binding proteins affect long-range oxidative damage to DNA. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[26]  J. Thornton,et al.  Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins: is the evidence stacked against hydrogen bonding? , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-π interactions in structural biology , 1999 .

[28]  P. Klatt,et al.  Redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding by reversible S‐glutathiolation , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[29]  J. Gallivan,et al.  A Computational Study of Cation−π Interactions vs Salt Bridges in Aqueous Media: Implications for Protein Engineering , 2000 .

[30]  S. Miura,et al.  Role of Aromaticity of Agonist Switches of Angiotensin II in the Activation of the AT1 Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  D A Dougherty,et al.  A mechanism for ion selectivity in potassium channels: computational studies of cation-pi interactions. , 1993, Science.

[32]  R. Kodandapani,et al.  New Insights on DNA Recognition by ets Proteins from the Crystal Structure of the PU.1 ETS Domain-DNA Complex* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  The Cationminus signpi Interaction. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[34]  R. Maki,et al.  Mutation analysis of the Pip interaction domain reveals critical residues for protein-protein interactions. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  R. Wintjens,et al.  Identification of Amino Acid Residues in the ETS Transcription Factor Erg That Mediate Erg-Jun/Fos-DNA Ternary Complex Formation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  From ab initio quantum mechanics to molecular neurobiology: a cation-pi binding site in the nicotinic receptor. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Rooman,et al.  Role of salt bridges in homeodomains investigated by structural analyses and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2001, Biopolymers.

[38]  T. Richmond,et al.  The B‐box dominates SAP‐1–SRF interactions in the structure of the ternary complex , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[39]  J. Schreiber,et al.  Structural requirements for DNA binding of GCM proteins. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  S L Mowbray,et al.  Planar stacking interactions of arginine and aromatic side-chains in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  J. Barton,et al.  Long-range oxidative damage to DNA: effects of distance and sequence. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.