An existential function of enemyship: evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control.

Perceiving oneself as having powerful enemies, although superficially disagreeable, may serve an important psychological function. On the basis of E. Becker's (1969) existential theorizing, the authors argue that people attribute exaggerated influence to enemies as a means of compensating for perceptions of reduced control over their environment. In Study 1, individuals dispositionally low in perceived control responded to a reminder of external hazards by attributing more influence to a personal enemy. In Study 2, a situational threat to control over external hazard strengthened participants' belief in the conspiratorial power of a political enemy. Examining moderators and outcomes of this process, Study 3 showed that participants were especially likely to attribute influence over life events to an enemy when the broader social system appeared disordered, and Study 4 showed that perceiving an ambiguously powerful enemy under conditions of control threat decreased perceptions of external risk and bolstered feelings of personal control.

[1]  S. West,et al.  The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives , 2009, Journal of personality assessment.

[2]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception , 2008, Science.

[3]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[4]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  God and the government: testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Robert Moore,et al.  Purity and Danger , 2008 .

[6]  R. Heath,et al.  Terrorism: Communication and Rhetorical Perspectives , 2008 .

[7]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Loving Those Who Justify Inequality , 2008, Psychological science.

[8]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  Terrorism as chaos: A chaos model for managing random acts of terror , 2008 .

[9]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[10]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Murley Natural Born Celebrities: Serial Killers in American Culture , 2006 .

[12]  Roxana M Gonzalez,et al.  Retraction: Forecasting One’s Future Based on Fleeting Subjective Experiences , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  G. Adams The cultural grounding of personal relationship: enemyship in North American and West African worlds. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Tracy A. Hans A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Adventure Programming on Locus of Control , 2000, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.

[15]  Adekeye Adebajo,et al.  West Africa's security challenges : building peace in a troubled region , 2004 .

[16]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  P. Glick,et al.  Sacrificial lambs dressed in wolves' clothing: Envious prejudice, ideology, and the scapegoating of Jews. , 2002 .

[18]  David L. Brown Contemporary Nationalism: Civic, Ethnocultural and Multicultural Politics , 2000 .

[19]  R. Sabatelli The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[20]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Morality and Health , 1999, Nursing History Review.

[21]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. , 1997 .

[22]  S. West,et al.  Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[23]  Tom Douglas Scapegoats: Transferring Blame , 1995 .

[24]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  S. Duck,et al.  Having and managing enemies: A very challenging relationship. , 1995 .

[26]  Julia T. Wood,et al.  Confronting relationship challenges , 1995 .

[27]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[28]  A Furnham,et al.  Measuring locus of control: a critique of general, children's, health- and work-related locus of control questionnaires. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[29]  B. Silverstein The psychology of enemy images. , 1992 .

[30]  J. Reich,et al.  Dispositional control beliefs and the consequences of a control-enhancing intervention. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[31]  R. Holt College Students' Definitions and Images of Enemies , 1989 .

[32]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  P. Duttweiler,et al.  The Internal Control Index: A Newly Developed Measure of Locus of Control , 1984 .

[34]  N. Weinstein Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[35]  W. Froming,et al.  Mood and personality: A search for the causal relationship1 , 1980 .

[36]  J. Kraus The Political Economy of Conflict in Ghana , 1980 .

[37]  C. H. Patterson Psychology and social responsibility. , 1972 .

[38]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[39]  R. Stagner The Psychology of Social Movements. , 1939 .

[40]  Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche,et al.  Human, All Too Human , 1878 .