A new automated method of cloud masking for advanced very high resolution radiometer full-resolution data over the ocean

This paper reports on a new algorithm to remove cloud-contaminated pixels from daytime and nighttime 1-km advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) data. The technique was developed in response to Navy needs to efficiently and accurately eliminate cloud contaminated pixels from real-time satellite digital images. The remaining “cloud free” sea surface temperature (SST) pixels would be available for analysts to utilize in tracking ocean mesoscale fronts and eddies as well as input to SST and ocean thermal analysis. Initial poor results with existing cloud-masking techniques led to this effort. The method uses a series of approaches to locate cloud-contaminated pixels which include (1) use of multiple bands to detect signatures not readily available from single-channel data, (2) extraction of cloud edge information through local segmentation of the image using the cluster shade texture measure based on the gray level cooccurrence (GLC) matrix and, (3) discrimination of cloud-free from cloud-contaminated regions with an area labeling procedure. This technique is evaluated on identical data sets utilizing other experimental and operational cloud algorithms and cloud masks produced through human interpretation. This method, tested over a wide range of conditions and geographical locations, produces accurate and efficient daytime and nighttime SST data sets.

[1]  S. Sengupta,et al.  The effect of spatial resolution upon texture-based cloud field classifications , 1989 .

[2]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Technique for Distinguishing Surface and Cloud Types in the Polar Regions , 1987 .

[3]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Use Of Texture Operators In Segmentation , 1986 .

[4]  James J. Simpson,et al.  An automated cloud screening algorithm for daytime advanced very high resolution radiometer imagery , 1990 .

[5]  Robert A. Shuchman,et al.  Textural Analysis And Real-Time Classification of Sea-Ice Types Using Digital SAR Data , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Joann Parikh,et al.  A comparative study of cloud classification techniques , 1977 .

[7]  Sarah H. Peckinpaugh,et al.  Edge detection applied to satellite imagery of the oceans , 1989 .

[8]  S. K. Sengupta,et al.  Cloud field classification based upon high spatial resolution textural features: 1. Gray level co‐occurrence matrix approach , 1988 .

[9]  Roland T. Chin,et al.  Determination of Rainfall Rates from GOES Satellite Images by a Pattern Recognition Technique , 1985 .

[10]  William G. Pichel,et al.  Comparative performance of AVHRR‐based multichannel sea surface temperatures , 1985 .

[11]  J. Key,et al.  Cloud cover analysis with Arctic Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer data: 2. Classification with spectral and textural measures , 1990 .

[12]  C. Crosiar,et al.  The Third Phase of TESS , 1991 .

[13]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  J. Key,et al.  Classification of merged AVHRR and SMMR Arctic data with neural networks , 1989 .

[15]  F. Bretherton,et al.  Cloud cover from high-resolution scanner data - Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view , 1982 .

[16]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Polar Cloud and Surface Classification Using AVHRR Imagery: An Intercomparison of Methods , 1992 .