Research Integration Using Dialogue Methods

Research on real-world problems—like restoration of wetlands, the needs of the elderly, effective disaster response and the future of the airline industry—requires expert knowledge from a range of disciplines, as well as from stakeholders affected by the problem and those in a position to do something about it. This book charts new territory in taking a systematic approach to research integration using dialogue methods to bring together multiple perspectives. It links specific dialogue methods to particular research integration tasks.

[1]  MURRAY TUROFF,et al.  Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of Delphi , 2002 .

[2]  Johs Grundahl,et al.  The Danish consensus conference model , 1995 .

[3]  Tarah Wright.  Giving “teeth” to an environmental policy: a Delphi Study at Dalhousie University , 2006 .

[4]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[5]  G. Bammer.  Guiding Principles for Integration in Natural Resource Management (NRM) as a Contribution to Sustainability , 2005 .

[6]  Ann Taket,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. , 1991 .

[7]  S. Henson.  Estimating the incidence of food-borne Salmonella and the effectiveness of alternative control measures using the Delphi method. , 1997, International journal of food microbiology.

[8]  Mary Kane,et al.  Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation , 2006 .

[9]  H. D. Jouvenel,et al.  A Brief Methodological Guide to Scenario Building , 2000 .

[10]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Towards a Publication Culture in Transdisciplinary Research , 2007 .

[11]  M. Healey,et al.  Pedagogic Research Methods in Geography Higher Education , 2003 .

[12]  Steve Gaskin,et al.  Student Perceptions of Geography and Environmental Science Fieldwork in the Light of Restricted Access to the Field, Caused by Foot and Mouth Disease in the UK in 2001 , 2003 .

[13]  William Ury,et al.  Getting past no: negotiating your way from confrontation to cooperation , 1993 .

[14]  Peter Checkland,et al.  From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s , 1985 .

[15]  William N. Isaacs,et al.  Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life , 1999 .

[16]  P. Pearson,et al.  Going home from hospital -- an appreciative inquiry study. , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[17]  Richard Rhodes,et al.  The Making of the Atomic Bomb , 1989 .

[18]  J. Pfeiffer,et al.  Reference guide to handbooks and annuals : volumes I-VIII and '72-'81 annuals , 1981 .

[19]  M. Lockwood.  Integration of Natural Area Values: Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Approaches , 2005 .

[20]  David H. Guston,et al.  Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy , 1999 .

[21]  Armano Srbljinovic,et al.  Agent Based Modelling and Simulation of Social Processes , 2003 .

[22]  P R Noyce,et al.  Appropriateness measurement: application to advice-giving in community pharmacies. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[23]  Christian Rostboll,et al.  On Deliberative Democracy , 2001 .

[24]  E. Kashefi,et al.  Grounded citizens’ juries: a tool for health activism? , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[25]  K. Lohr,et al.  Tobacco use: prevention, cessation, and control. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[26]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Developing the Ethical Delphi , 2007 .

[27]  V. Lens.  Principled negotiation: a new tool for case advocacy. , 2004, Social work.

[28]  M. Weisbord,et al.  Future Search: An Action Guide to Finding Common Ground in Organizations and Communities , 1995 .

[29]  F. Crous,et al.  Utilising Appreciative Inquiry (AI) in Creating a Shared Meaning of Ethics in Organisations , 2005 .

[30]  Ben Mepham,et al.  A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods: The Ethical Matrix , 2000 .

[31]  Elizabeth Kachur,et al.  Guidelines for Preclerkship Bioterrorism Curricula , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[33]  Clare Palmer,et al.  Technology assessment and the 'ethical matrix' , 2003, Poiesis Prax..

[34]  M. Polanyi.  Toward Common Ground and Action on Repetitive Strain Injuries , 2001 .

[35]  Wendy Gregory,et al.  Planning for disaster: developing a multi-agency counselling service , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[36]  Harrison Owen.  Open Space Technology: A User's Guide. Second Edition. , 1997 .

[37]  Michael Jacobs,et al.  Citizens and wetlands: evaluating the Ely citizens’ jury , 2000 .

[38]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[39]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[40]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a New Specialisation , 2005 .

[41]  Keith Newton,et al.  Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions — Theory, Cases and Techniques , 1982 .

[42]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[43]  Ian Wilson,et al.  From Scenario Thinking to Strategic Action , 2000 .

[44]  M. Penker,et al.  Scenarios for the Austrian food chain in 2020 and its landscape impacts , 2004 .

[45]  S. Anderson,et al.  Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. , 2000 .

[46]  Developing the public health practitioner workforce in England: lessons from theory and practice. , 2005, Public health.

[47]  Jane Magruder Watkins,et al.  Appreciative Inquiry: Change at the Speed of Imagination , 2001 .

[48]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .

[49]  Sue Holwell.  Soft Systems Methodology: Other Voices , 2000 .

[50]  S. Hammond.  The Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry , 1996 .

[51]  William N. Isaacs.  TOWARD AN ACTION THEORY OF DIALOGUE , 2001 .

[52]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges , 2008 .

[53]  Merrelyn Emery,et al.  The Search Conference: A Powerful Method for Planning Organizational Change and Community Action , 1996 .

[54]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Assessing Fisheries – Using an Ethical Matrix in a Participatory Process , 2001 .

[55]  Rick Davies.  An evolutionary approach to facilitating organisational learning: an experiment by the Christian Commission for Development in Bangladesh , 1998 .

[56]  Joseph R. Herkert,et al.  Assessing the impact of shift to electronic communication and information dissemination by a professional organization: An analysis of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 1998 .

[57]  J. Abrahm,et al.  Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate , 2008 .

[58]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[59]  Katy Moyer,et al.  SCENARIO PLANNING AT BRITISH AIRWAYS: A CASE STUDY , 1996 .

[60]  G. Midgley.  Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice , 2000 .

[61]  Angela Oels.  Investigating the emotional roller‐coaster ride: a case study‐based assessment of the Future Search Conference design , 2002 .

[62]  Jessica Dart,et al.  A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique , 2003 .

[63]  Gabriele Bammer.  Do we need a new discipline to document and transmit problem-based learnings? , 2008 .

[64]  D. Yankelovich,et al.  The Magic of Dialogue: Transforming Conflict into Cooperation , 1999 .

[65]  M. Weisbord.  Discovering Common Ground: How Future Search Conferences Bring People Together to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation, Empowerment, Shared Vision and Collaborative Action , 1995 .

[66]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: a conceptual development , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[67]  F. Telischi,et al.  Cochlear Implant Soft Failures Consensus Development Conference Statement , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.