The Effect of Externally set Goals on Reaching Integrative Agreements in Competitive Markets

The study of the negotiation process has enjoyed a recent resurgence of scholarly interest. Of particular concern is the ability of negotiators to achieve solutions which result in integrative outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of different levels of aspiration/goals on negotiator success and their ability to reach integrative solutions in a competitive market. One hundred fifty-eight subjects who were assigned one of four levels of goal difficulty-no goal, compromise goal, challenging goal, and difficult goal-participated in a competitive, multi-person, multi-transaction market simulation. The study found (1) challenging and difficult goals significantly enhanced participants' performance; (2) the more difficult the goal, the fewer transactions were completed; and (3) while there were no differences in total profitability among the challenging goal, compromise goal, and no goal, the difficult goal condition had a significant and negative effect on the ability of participants to achieve profitable outcomes within the market. A discussion of these findings and directions for future research are presented.

[1]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. , 1980 .

[2]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[3]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The directing function of goals in task performance. , 1969 .

[4]  W. Blatchford,et al.  Getting a yes.... , 1992, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[5]  C. Plott,et al.  Intertemporal Speculation with a Random Demand in an Experimental Market , 1982 .

[6]  D. Thakore.  Conflict and Conflict Management , 2013 .

[7]  M. Bazerman.  Negotiator Judgment , 1983 .

[8]  J. S. Adams,et al.  TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  S. Gellerman.  Behavioral Strategies , 1969 .

[10]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Behavioral strategies to improve productivity , 1981 .

[11]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Goal Setting A Motivational Technique That Works , 2016 .

[12]  H. Garland,et al.  Influence of ability, assigned goals, and normative information on personal goals and performance: A challenge to the goal attainability assumption. , 1983 .

[13]  J. Burger,et al.  Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attribution. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[15]  J. S. Himes.  Conflict and Conflict Management , 1980 .

[16]  D. G. Pruitt.  Conflict and Conflict Resolution, Social Psychology of , 2001 .

[17]  T. Jick,et al.  The Public Sector Mediation Process , 1978 .

[18]  J. Rubin,et al.  The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation , 1975 .

[19]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. , 1974 .

[20]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[21]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  The effects of negotiation and arbitration cost salience on bargainer behavior: The role of the arbitrator and constituency on negotiator judgment , 1984 .

[22]  A. Kidron,et al.  The Effectiveness of Experiential Methods in Training and Education: The Case of Role Playing , 1977 .

[23]  Adams Js.  Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[24]  E. A. Locke.  Relation of goal level to performance with a short work period and multiple goal levels. , 1982 .

[25]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Integrative bargaining in a competitive market , 2015 .

[26]  Cheryl Missiuna,et al.  e e . e , 2013 .

[27]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[28]  ScienceDirect.  Organizational behavior and human performance , 1984 .

[29]  K. Thomas.  Toward Multi-Dimensional Values in Teaching: The Example of Conflict Behaviors , 1977 .